helm-chart-test

name	helm-chart-test
description	Plan, write, and validate helm-unittest tests for a chart. Discovers chart structure, maps coverage gaps, and applies repository helm-unittest conventions.
user_invocable	true

/helm-chart-test [chart] [component]

Use this skill whenever the user asks to add, expand, fix, or review helm-unittest coverage for a chart, or when a chart feature change needs matching rendered-manifest tests.

Argument Handling

During feature implementation, infer the chart and component from the files being changed or from the requested feature. Add or update focused tests for the affected rendered behavior without pausing for broad coverage analysis or scoping questions, unless the requested behavior is ambiguous.

If no arguments are provided for a standalone test task, ask the user which chart they want to work on, then proceed as if they provided just the chart name.

If only <chart> is provided for a standalone coverage audit, run the full discovery and coverage analysis below before asking any questions.

If <chart> <component> is provided for a standalone test task, inspect that component and choose the relevant existing or new test files. Ask scoping questions only when the requested coverage depth or target templates cannot be inferred.

Feature Implementation Mode

When this skill is used as part of implementing a chart feature, do not stop after planning or ask the user to choose a component. Instead:

1. Identify the affected chart from charts/<chart>/....
2. Identify affected templates, helpers, and values from the feature diff or requested change.
3. Read existing nearby tests and mirror their style.
4. Add or update focused tests for the new or changed rendered behavior.
5. Cover important enabled/disabled branches, value propagation, selectors, labels, annotations, containers, volumes, and service wiring touched by the feature.
6. Run the relevant make helm-unittest HELM_CHART=<chart-name> command.

Ask the user only when there are multiple plausible feature semantics or when the chart/component cannot be determined from local context.

Discovery and Coverage Analysis

Work through these steps silently. Produce a single structured report at the end.

1. Understand the Chart Structure

• Read charts/<chart>/Chart.yaml and note the chart type, version, kubeVersion, and dependencies.
• Read the top level of charts/<chart>/values.yaml to understand major configuration axes, deployment modes, and component enable flags.
• List charts/<chart>/templates/**.
• Identify component groups. Subdirectories under templates/ are natural groups. If the chart has flat templates, treat the whole chart as one component.
• Read _helpers.tpl and any other _*.tpl files before testing templates that call helpers.

2. Map Existing Test Coverage

• List charts/<chart>/tests/**.
• For each component group, count:
  • renderable templates, excluding _*.tpl helper/partial files
  • corresponding test files in charts/<chart>/tests/<component>/
• Check whether existing tests exercise the relevant branches, not just whether a file exists.

3. Assess Complexity

Determine whether the chart is simple or complex.

• Simple: flat templates, no deployment modes, fewer than 10 renderable templates.
• Complex: subdirectories, deployment modes, major conditional rendering, or more than 10 renderable templates.

For a simple chart, present a single coverage table and recommend whether to proceed with the whole chart at once.

For a complex chart, group templates into logical work units and recommend a starting component.

4. Present the Coverage Report

Use this format:

## <chart> - Test Coverage Analysis

| Component | Renderable templates | Test files | Coverage |
|---|---:|---:|---|
| core / root-level | N | N | None / Partial / Good |
| gateway | N | N | None / Partial / Good |
| ingester | N | N | None / Partial / Good |

### Notes
- <important observations about deployment modes, required values, lookup usage, or test complexity>

### Suggested starting point
<recommend the lowest-risk, highest-value component and explain why>

Recommended next test target: <component or whole chart>

For standalone coverage audits, wait for the user to choose a component before writing tests. For feature implementation, proceed with focused tests for the component touched by the feature.

Scoping Questions

For standalone test-expansion tasks where scope cannot be inferred, ask:

1. Scope within the component: all templates, or specific templates?
2. Existing tests: extend partial tests, or add new test files alongside them?
3. Coverage depth: happy path only, or full branch coverage for every significant if / with / range?
4. Known gotchas: deployment modes, required values, lookup behavior, subchart values, or compatibility constraints?

After the user answers, summarize the agreed scope in one short paragraph, then begin writing tests. Skip these questions when implementing a specific feature and the affected behavior is clear from the request or diff.

helm-unittest Overview

Tests are YAML files in charts/<chart-name>/tests/ that validate rendered Kubernetes manifests. Each test renders templates with specified values and asserts on the output.

Each tests[].it case renders independently with that case's value inputs. Keep tests focused and deterministic: one behavior per test, explicit value overrides, and scoped assertions.

Test File Structure

# $schema: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/helm-unittest/helm-unittest/refs/heads/main/schema/helm-testsuite.json
suite: <descriptive suite name>
values:
  - ../ci/<values-file>.yaml
set:
  key.nested: value
templates:
  - templates/<path-to-template>.yaml
tests:
  - it: <test case description>
    values:
      - ./values/<scenario>.yaml
    set:
      key.nested: value
    documentSelector:
      path: metadata.name
      value: RELEASE-NAME-myapp
    asserts:
      - isKind:
          of: Deployment
      - equal:
          path: metadata.name
          value: RELEASE-NAME-myapp
      - contains:
          path: spec.template.spec.containers[0].env
          content:
            name: MY_VAR
            value: my-value

Scope, Precedence, and Targeting

• Value precedence: chart values.yaml < suite values < suite set < test values < test set.
• Template scope precedence: suite templates can be narrowed by test template / templates, then by assertion-level template.
• Document targeting precedence: assertion documentSelector / documentIndex overrides test-level selector/index.
• Use documentSelector for multi-document templates instead of brittle numeric documentIndex when possible.
• hasDocuments ignores selectors by default; set filterAware: true to count only selector/index-filtered documents.

Suite and Test Options

• release: exercise behavior that depends on .Release (name, namespace, revision, upgrade).
• capabilities: pin Kubernetes versions/APIs for branches guarded by .Capabilities.*.
• chart: override .Chart.version / .Chart.appVersion when template output depends on them.
• excludeTemplates: narrow broad template globs to avoid unrelated documents in a suite.
• skip: only for temporary or unreleased behavior; prefer active assertions over skipped tests.
• postRenderer: use only when chart behavior explicitly depends on post-render transforms.

Testing lookup with kubernetesProvider

Use kubernetesProvider whenever templates call lookup; without it, lookup returns empty and branch coverage is incomplete.

• Register API kinds in scheme using "<group>/<version>/<Kind>" or "v1/<Kind>" for core APIs.
• Each scheme entry must define gvr (group optional for core APIs, plus version, resource) and namespaced.
• Provide fixture resources in objects.
• Test-level kubernetesProvider.objects can add scenario-specific fixtures without rewriting suite-wide defaults.

templates:
  - templates/lookup.yaml
kubernetesProvider:
  scheme:
    "v1/Namespace":
      gvr:
        version: "v1"
        resource: "namespaces"
      namespaced: false
    "v1/Pod":
      gvr:
        version: "v1"
        resource: "pods"
      namespaced: true
    "networking.k8s.io/v1/Ingress":
      gvr:
        group: "networking.k8s.io"
        version: "v1"
        resource: "ingresses"
      namespaced: true
  objects:
    - kind: Pod
      apiVersion: v1
      metadata:
        name: exists
        namespace: default
tests:
  - it: should find existing pod through lookup
    asserts:
      - isNotNullOrEmpty:
          path: 
       
           
           
         
    
      
          
           
          
             
             
    
       
           
       
           
           

Assertion Guidance

Assertion	Purpose
equal	Exact match at JSON path
notEqual	Value differs from expected
matchRegex	Regular expression match on string value
exists	Path exists in rendered output
notExists	Path is absent from rendered output
isEmpty / isNotEmpty	Path is empty or not empty
isNullOrEmpty / isNotNullOrEmpty	Path is null/empty or present with content
isKind	Kubernetes resource kind check
isAPIVersion	API version check
contains	Array/map contains entry
notContains	Array/map does not contain entry
hasDocuments	Number of YAML documents rendered
matchSnapshot	Snapshot testing
failedTemplate	Template should fail to render
notFailedTemplate	Template should render successfully
isSubset	Rendered output is a superset of expected
lengthEqual	Array/map length equals expected count

Use antonym assertions (notEqual, notContains, etc.) instead of relying on not: true unless that is clearer.

Prefer equal, contains, and specific negative assertions over broad exists checks. Specific assertions catch regressions.

Assertion Scoping Patterns

  - it: targets a single Deployment by name
    templates:
      - templates/deployment.yaml
      - templates/image-renderer-deployment.yaml
    asserts:
      - equal:
          path: spec.replicas
          value: 1
        documentSelector:
          path: metadata.name
          value: RELEASE-NAME-grafana

  - it: counts only selected docs
    template: templates/extra-manifests.yaml
    documentSelector:
      path: kind
      value: ConfigMap
      matchMany: true
    asserts:
      - hasDocuments:
          count: 2
          filterAware: true

Multi-Template Safety

If a suite includes workload templates plus config.yaml, set template on every assertion unless the test intentionally targets all templates.

Put template at the assertion root, not inside assertion parameters.

Wrong:

      - notContains:
          template: backend/statefulset.yaml
          path: spec.template.spec.containers
          content:
            name: loki-sc-rules

Correct:

      - template: backend/statefulset.yaml
        notContains:
          path: spec.template.spec.containers
          content:
            name: loki-sc-rules

Path and jsonPath Guidance

• Prefer precise paths over broad existence checks.
• When map keys contain dots or slashes, use jsonPath bracket syntax.
• Keep escaping consistent to avoid false negatives.

  - equal:
      path: metadata.annotations["kubernetes.io/ingress.class"]
      value: nginx

Conditional Rendering Tests

  - it: should not render when disabled
    set:
      component.enabled: false
    asserts:
      - hasDocuments:
          count: 0

Testing with Release Values

  - it: should use release name in labels
    release:
      name: my-release
      namespace: my-namespace
    asserts:
      - equal:
          path: metadata.namespace
          value: my-namespace

Test File Organization

Mirror the template directory structure:

charts/<chart>/tests/
  deployment_test.yaml
  service_test.yaml
  ingester/
    statefulset_test.yaml
  compactor/
    deployment_test.yaml

Test filenames must end with .yaml. This repository configures helm-unittest with --file 'tests/**/*.yaml', so any .yaml filename is valid. <template>_test.yaml is preferred.

Writing Workflow

1. Read the template being tested. Understand every conditional, value reference, helper call, and document emitted.
2. Read _helpers.tpl and any other helper partials used by the template.
3. Read values.yaml to understand defaults and the full value schema.
4. Map render targets: determine whether the template emits zero, one, or many documents and which selector is stable.
5. Write tests for default rendering, significant conditional branches, selector behavior, multi-template scoping, and edge cases.
6. Run the tests.
7. Fix failures by adjusting assertions to match actual rendered output.
8. Repeat until the test file passes.

Running Tests

Run all charts:

make helm-unittest

Run tests for one chart:

make helm-unittest HELM_CHART=<chart-name>

Run one test file:

make helm-unittest HELM_CHART=<chart-name> HELM_UNITTEST_FILE='tests/<subdir>/<file>_test.yaml'

Rules

• Only create or edit .yaml files under charts/*/tests/ when this skill is being used specifically to write tests.
• Do not modify templates, values.yaml, Chart.yaml, or non-test files as part of a test-writing task unless the user explicitly expands the scope.
• Never run destructive shell commands.
• Use RELEASE-NAME as the default release name in assertions.
• Always set deployment-mode-style flags explicitly. Do not rely on defaults when a chart has conditional rendering modes.
• When a template has subchart dependencies, use set to provide required subchart values.
• Always run relevant helm-unittest commands after writing tests.
• If a test run reveals the template does not render with default values, inspect values.yaml and adjust the test setup.
• Prefer documentSelector over hardcoded documentIndex for templates that can reorder output.
• Use hasDocuments.filterAware: true when asserting counts under selector/index filtering.
• Use template / templates at test or assertion level to prevent cross-template assertion bleed.
• For negative paths, assert absence with notExists or notContains.