Skip to main content

run-a-vendor-selection

Evaluate and select a supplier through a consistent, conflict-aware evidence process. Use when multiple vendors or sourcing options must be compared against approved requirements.

Source facts

Repository
protosphinx/sphinxstack
Last source activity
July 29, 2026 at 13:55
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
3
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
2 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
run-a-vendor-selection
category
start
description
Evaluate and select a supplier through a consistent, conflict-aware evidence process. Use when multiple vendors or sourcing options must be compared against approved requirements.
# run-a-vendor-selection ## Procedure 1. Confirm scope, authority, timetable, mandatory gates, evaluation matrix, and communications rules before opening bids. 2. Record evaluator roles, expertise, availability, and conflicts; replace or manage conflicted participation. 3. Check submission completeness and mandatory compliance without exposing competitor information. 4. Have evaluators score independently with evidence and confidence before moderation. 5. Moderate material score differences by examining evidence rather than forcing consensus. 6. Run structured clarifications, demonstrations, references, security checks, and commercial normalization consistently. 7. Model total cost, implementation, dependency, continuity, and exit risk. 8. Document recommendation, dissent, conditions, approvals, bidder communication, and debrief boundaries. ## Guardrails - Do not alter criteria, provide unequal information, or backfill a preferred result. - Separate supplier claims from independently verified evidence. - Use qualified legal, finance, security, privacy, and procurement owners for specialist conclusions. ## Done - A selection file contains independent scores, moderation evidence, due diligence, and normalized cost - The recommendation traces to requirements, risk, conditions, conflicts, and authority - Approval, supplier notices, and a defensible audit trail are complete
View on GitHub