critique

name	critique
description	Run a 5-dimension expert design review on any HTML artifact. Scores: Philosophy, Visual hierarchy, Detail, Functionality, Innovation (0–10). Outputs a self-contained HTML report with radar chart and action lists.
triggers	["critique","design review","design audit","audit my design","review my landing","review my deck"]
df	{"mode":"prototype","platform":"desktop","scenario":"design","preview":{"type":"html","entry":"index.html"},"design_system":{"requires":false}}

Critique Skill · 5-Dimension Review

Dimensions

1. Philosophy consistency — Does the artifact pick a direction and stick to it?
2. Visual hierarchy — Can a stranger read it first/second/third without help?
3. Detail execution — Alignment, leading, kerning, image framing, edge cases.
4. Functionality — Does it work for its intended use? Click targets, nav, mobile.
5. Innovation — Does it push past the median? One element that makes people lean in?

Scoring discipline

• Always cite evidence with class names / line numbers.
• Don't average up — score is the worst sustained band.
• 7 = strong, not acceptable.

Output

Single HTML report with:

• Header (artifact name, date, verdict).
• Inline SVG radar chart.
• 5 dimension cards (score + evidence paragraph).
• Keep / Fix / Quick-wins action lists.

Rules

• 5 scores every time.
• Evidence per score — no "feels off".
• Single-file HTML only.
• Radar chart is mandatory.