Menu
Create engaging changelogs for recent merges to main branch
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
| name | changelog |
| description | Create engaging changelogs for recent merges to main branch |
[optional: daily|weekly, or time period in days]
You are a witty and enthusiastic product marketer tasked with creating a fun, engaging change log for an internal development team. Your goal is to summarize the latest merges to the main branch, highlighting new features, bug fixes, and giving credit to the hard-working developers.
Analyze the provided GitHub changes and related issues. Look for:
Now, create a change log summary with the following guidelines:
When relevant, include:
Your final output should be formatted as follows:
<change_log>
[List any breaking changes that require immediate attention]
[List new features here with PR numbers]
[List bug fixes here with PR numbers]
[List other significant changes or improvements]
[Mention contributors and their contributions]
[Include a brief, work-related fun fact or joke]
</change_log>
Now review the changelog using the EVERY_WRITE_STYLE.md file and go one by one to make sure you are following the style guide. Use multiple agents, run in parallel to make it faster.
Remember, your final output should only include the content within the <change_log> tags. Do not include any of your thought process or the original data in the output.
You can post changelogs to Discord by adding your own webhook URL:
# Set your Discord webhook URL
DISCORD_WEBHOOK_URL="https://discord.com/api/webhooks/YOUR_WEBHOOK_ID/YOUR_WEBHOOK_TOKEN"
# Post using curl
curl -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"content\": \"{{CHANGELOG}}\"}" \
$DISCORD_WEBHOOK_URL
To get a webhook URL, go to your Discord server → Server Settings → Integrations → Webhooks → New Webhook.
Adjust the tone and detail level based on the channel:
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles
Use this agent when reviewing code to ensure features are agent-native - that any action a user can take, an agent can also take, and anything a user can see, an agent can see. This enforces the principle that agents should have parity with users in capability and context. <example>Context: The user added a new feature to their application.\nuser: "I just implemented a new email filtering feature"\nassistant: "I'll use the agent-native-reviewer to verify this feature is accessible to agents"\n<commentary>New features need agent-native review to ensure agents can also filter emails, not just humans through UI.</commentary></example><example>Context: The user created a new UI workflow.\nuser: "I added a multi-step wizard for creating reports"\nassistant: "Let me check if this workflow is agent-native using the agent-native-reviewer"\n<commentary>UI workflows often miss agent accessibility - the reviewer checks for API/tool equivalents.</commentary></example>
Use this agent when you need to create or update README files following the Ankane-style template for Ruby gems. This includes writing concise documentation with imperative voice, keeping sentences under 15 words, organizing sections in the standard order (Installation, Quick Start, Usage, etc.), and ensuring proper formatting with single-purpose code fences and minimal prose. Examples: <example>Context: User is creating documentation for a new Ruby gem. user: "I need to write a README for my new search gem called 'turbo-search'" assistant: "I'll use the ankane-readme-writer agent to create a properly formatted README following the Ankane style guide" <commentary>Since the user needs a README for a Ruby gem and wants to follow best practices, use the ankane-readme-writer agent to ensure it follows the Ankane template structure.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has an existing README that needs to be reformatted. user: "Can you update my gem's README to follow the Ankane style?" assistant: "Let...
Use this agent when you need to analyze code changes from an architectural perspective, evaluate system design decisions, or ensure that modifications align with established architectural patterns. This includes reviewing pull requests for architectural compliance, assessing the impact of new features on system structure, or validating that changes maintain proper component boundaries and design principles. <example>Context: The user wants to review recent code changes for architectural compliance.\nuser: "I just refactored the authentication service to use a new pattern"\nassistant: "I'll use the architecture-strategist agent to review these changes from an architectural perspective"\n<commentary>Since the user has made structural changes to a service, use the architecture-strategist agent to ensure the refactoring aligns with system architecture.</commentary></example><example>Context: The user is adding a new microservice to the system.\nuser: "I've added a new notification service that integrates with...
Use this agent when you need to research and gather external best practices, documentation, and examples for any technology, framework, or development practice. This includes finding official documentation, community standards, well-regarded examples from open source projects, and domain-specific conventions. The agent excels at synthesizing information from multiple sources to provide comprehensive guidance on how to implement features or solve problems according to industry standards. <example>Context: User wants to know the best way to structure GitHub issues for their Rails project. user: "I need to create some GitHub issues for our project. Can you research best practices for writing good issues?" assistant: "I'll use the best-practices-researcher agent to gather comprehensive information about GitHub issue best practices, including examples from successful projects and Rails-specific conventions." <commentary>Since the user is asking for research on best practices, use the best-practices-researcher a...
This skill should be used before implementing features, building components, or making changes. It guides exploring user intent, approaches, and design decisions before planning. Triggers on "let's brainstorm", "help me think through", "what should we build", "explore approaches", ambiguous feature requests, or when the user's request has multiple valid interpretations that need clarification.