graph-design

name	graph-design
description	Design, audit, and redraw inline SVG architecture diagrams for rcarmo.github.io using the site’s established visual language and source-verification workflow.
distribution	project

Graph Design

Use this skill when creating, fixing, or auditing project diagrams in projects/rcarmo.github.io.

This captures the diagram conventions established during the April 2026 portfolio cleanup.

Scope

Applies to:

• inline SVG diagrams embedded in _content/*.md
• architecture/flow redraws for project pages
• diagram consistency audits across multiple project files
• arrow routing, label placement, and dark/light behavior
• source verification against upstream repos/READMEs when diagrams describe real systems

Canonical workflow

1. Read the project page in _content/<project>.md.
2. Read upstream docs/repo/README when the diagram represents real architecture.
3. Verify the current page copy matches reality before drawing.
4. Edit the ## Diagram block in _content/*.md.
5. Rebuild with bun run build.ts.
6. Verify the generated projects/*.html output.
7. If publishing, commit, push, and push a new v* tag.

Source of truth

• _content/*.md is canonical.
• Generated projects/*.html files are build outputs.
• Do not hand-maintain generated HTML.
• If the diagram and copy disagree, fix the source Markdown first.

Core principles

1. Source accuracy over aesthetics

Do not invent architecture.

If the project has a real upstream README, codebase, or template structure:

• read it first
• verify the components and data flow
• prefer actual system boundaries over generic boxes

Examples of things that must be source-verified before drawing:

• cloud resource topology
• protocol direction
• whether a component is a parser, cache, relay, renderer, or wrapper
• whether a system uses ARM templates vs Bicep, Ollama vs Azure/OpenAI, etc.

2. Keep diagrams simple

Prefer a small number of boxes with a clear left-to-right or top-to-bottom story.

Good diagrams usually show:

• inputs
• core transform or coordinator
• outputs
• persistent state (if relevant)
• one or two important protocols

Avoid turning every diagram into a full subsystem map.

3. Match the page story

The diagram must reinforce the:

• tagline
• About section
• How it works section
• Features

If the diagram implies something not stated in the page text, either:

• fix the page text from source, or
• remove the unsupported implication from the diagram

Visual language

Use the established inline SVG theme block.

Required theme structure

Every diagram should include:

• prefers-color-scheme: dark
• prefers-color-scheme: light
• transparent background
• standard classes:
  • .box
  • .box-accent
  • .box-green
  • .box-warm
  • .box-purple
  • .label
  • .sub
• shared arrow markers:
  • ah
  • ahs

Color usage

Typical meaning:

• box-accent: primary subject / main app / orchestrator
• box-green: positive output / running service / target runtime
• box-warm: input / config / storage / secondary artifact
• box-purple: helper state / library / model / internal subsystem
• box: neutral node

These are conventions, not hard laws, but be consistent within a diagram.

Layout rules

Preferred shapes

Use rounded rectangles:

• rx="8" for main boxes
• rx="6" or 8 consistently; avoid mixing too much

Preferred flow directions

Use one of these:

• left → center → right
• top → middle → bottom
• left → center with split outputs to upper-right/lower-right

Avoid zig-zag stories unless the project genuinely needs them.

Spacing

• leave clear horizontal gaps between columns
• keep enough vertical separation so labels and arrows do not collide
• do not let footer captions sit too close to arrows
• widen the viewBox when necessary rather than cramming text

Box sizing

• prefer consistent widths within a column
• give text room to breathe
• if a label wraps awkwardly, split it into label/sub lines rather than shrinking everything

Text rules

Label hierarchy

Use:

• .label for the main component name
• .sub for explanation, protocol, or scope

Wrap long text manually

Do not rely on SVG auto-wrapping.

Instead:

• split into multiple <text> lines
• move secondary info into .sub
• shorten wording where possible

Example:

• bad: YYYY/MM hierarchy + JSON on one cramped line
• good:
  • YYYY/MM hierarchy
  • + JSON

Keep wording concrete

Prefer:

• State file
• last UID per folder
• busybox.wasm
• TinyGo · ~2 MB · stubs

Avoid vague labels like:

• processor
• engine
• system
• backend magic

Arrow rules

This was the biggest source of regressions. Follow these strictly.

1. Arrows must be present when they matter

If the system is a flow diagram, arrows are not optional.

Common required flows:

• input → processor
• processor → output
• request ↔ response
• state update downward into a state file

2. Arrows must land on sensible edges

Start/end arrows on box edges, not in empty space.

Prefer:

• horizontal arrows between columns
• vertical arrows between stacked boxes

3. Use rounded elbow connectors for orthogonal paths

Do not use plain hard-corner orthogonal polylines.

Preferred options:

• straight <line> when the connection is directly horizontal/vertical
• rounded <path> elbows when routing around another box or changing direction

Use SVG paths with rounded corners, e.g. Q segments at turns.

4. Avoid awkward diagonals

Do not use diagonals unless the diagram really benefits from them.

In most portfolio diagrams, orthogonal routing is clearer.

5. Differentiate important flows when useful

Common convention used on the site:

• blue/accent arrow (ahs) for primary request/input flow
• neutral blue-grey arrow (ah) for secondary or state/output flow

But consistency matters more than strict semantics.

6. Bidirectional flows should be explicit

If a project is really request/response, draw both directions.

Examples:

• DNS query → bridge → mDNS query
• mDNS response → bridge → DNS response

Do not collapse request/response into one ambiguous line.

Diagram patterns that worked well

A. Single transform

Use for exporters, converters, wrappers, generators.

Pattern:

• input box
• main tool box
• output box(es)

Examples:

• PhotosExport
• imapbackup
• bun-opds-server

B. Coordinator plus helper state

Use for apps that maintain a state model or cache.

Pattern:

• frontend/client
• coordinator/server
• helper state below or beside it
• runtime target on the right

Examples:

• webterm
• imapbackup

C. One source, multiple output targets

Use when a tool emits multiple artifacts or execution modes.

Pattern:

• source/entrypoint on left
• applet/model/grouping in center
• two output targets on right

Examples:

• go-busybox
• macemu-jit

D. Request/response bridge

Use for relays, gateways, resolvers, proxies.

Pattern:

• client/source on left
• bridge in middle
• destination on right
• top arrows for requests, bottom arrows for responses

Example:

• mdnsbridge

Known pitfalls

Do not bulk-rewrite blindly

A previous mass SVG rewrite broke markers and even malformed tags.

If doing bulk changes:

• rebuild after changes
• inspect generated HTML
• spot-check multiple pages
• prefer incremental edits over massive regex rewrites when semantics matter

Do not trust automated layout inference alone

Scripts can normalize spacing, but they often:

• lose arrows
• route arrows awkwardly
• preserve the wrong semantics
• produce hard-corner orthogonal connectors

Use automation only for repetitive cleanup, then review manually.

Do not imply nonexistent components

Examples of mistakes to avoid:

• invented schema parser/cache layers
• wrong VM/runtime components
• stale protocol names
• outputs that do not actually exist

Do not overfit to previous bad diagrams

If the old diagram is wrong, redraw from source instead of preserving it.

Page-specific lessons learned

PhotosExport

• give output boxes enough room
• manually split long labels like + JSON
• exporter diagrams benefit from simple fan-out outputs

mdnsbridge

• upstream README contained the correct diagram
• request/response arrows matter
• the labels should reflect DNS query, mDNS query, and returned IP

bun-opds-server

• it needs all four arrows when representing Calibre → OPDS/kosync → reader/KOReader
• missing left-side arrows made the flow unreadable

ground-init

• do not invent a parser/schema/cache if the page describes state convergence across packages/files/users/services/scripts

macemu-jit

• diagram must say ARM64 host, not just Apple Silicon
• mention Raspberry Pi where relevant
• distinguish BasiliskII 68K JIT and SheepShaver PPC JIT when the page does

go-busybox

• show multi-call entrypoint and outputs clearly
• do not muddle applets, WASM artifact, and sandbox semantics in one ambiguous cluster

webterm

• separate browser UI, WASM renderer, server/go-te state, and PTY session
• make the dashboard/session model legible

imapbackup

• the main diagram is IMAP server → script → local mbox
• state file hangs below the script
• show incremental UID tracking and TLS simply

Audit checklist

When reviewing an existing diagram, check:

• Does it match the page copy?
• Does it match upstream source/docs?
• Are arrows present where the flow requires them?
• Do arrows terminate on box edges?
• Are elbow connectors rounded, not hard-cornered?
• Are labels readable at normal width?
• Does any line of text need manual wrapping?
• Are dark/light styles intact?
• Does the generated projects/*.html still contain the intended SVG?

Build and verification

From repo root:

bun run build.ts

Then verify:

• target projects/*.html regenerated
• SVG markup is present in generated HTML
• markers/arrows survived build output
• no labels overflow boxes
• no missing arrows on published pages

Useful checks:

rg "<svg|marker-end|<path d=|<line " _content/*.md projects/*.html
rg "stroke-linejoin|marker-end" projects/*.html

Publishing workflow

If the user wants the change published:

1. edit _content/*.md
2. run bun run build.ts
3. commit source + generated output
4. push master
5. create and push a new v* tag

Deliverables

When done, report briefly:

• which project diagrams changed
• whether you verified against source/upstream docs
• whether you rebuilt the site
• whether you pushed/tagged
• any diagrams still needing manual visual review