Skip to main content

logos-router-reasoning

Deploy and configure Logos Router for distributed semantic reasoning with zero-drift consensus across local AI nodes

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
reason-machines/mcp-skills
Last source activity
July 1, 2026 at 09:50
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
7
Forks
2

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
logos-router-reasoning
description
Deploy and configure Logos Router for distributed semantic reasoning with zero-drift consensus across local AI nodes
triggers
["set up logos router for distributed reasoning","configure zero-drift consensus protocol","create a reasoning mesh with multiple nodes","implement strict write discipline for AI","route queries across semantic reasoning nodes","build adaptive reasoning workflows with logos","debug logos router consensus failures","configure multilingual semantic routing"]
# Logos Router Reasoning Skill > Skill by [ara.so](https://ara.so) — MCP Skills collection. ## Overview Logos Router is a distributed semantic reasoning gateway that fragments AI reasoning across local nodes with zero-drift consensus guarantees. It implements a Strict Write Discipline (SWD) protocol to eliminate hallucination chains and maintain reasoning fidelity across multi-step inference tasks. The router coordinates reasoning through three layers: Grail (persistence), Chiron (routing), and Orpheus (synthesis). **Key features:** - Zero-drift consensus protocol for reasoning fidelity - Adaptive reasoning depth (1-7 steps) based on problem complexity - 16-language semantic routing with universal intermediate representation - Causal audit trails for every routing decision - 24/7 reasoning continuity with automatic failover ## Installation ### Prerequisites - Python 3.11 or later - Local inference engine (VLLM, Ollama, llama.cpp, etc.) - Network connectivity between mesh nodes (localhost OK for single-machine) ### Setup ```bash # Clone the repository git clone https://github.com/rak7777/mythic-mcp-proxy.git cd mythic-mcp-proxy # Install dependencies pip install -r requirements.txt # Initialize configuration cp config.example.yaml config.yaml ``` ## Configuration ### Basic Mesh Configuration Create a `config.yaml` file defining your reasoning mesh: ```yaml mesh: name: my-reasoning-lattice consensus_threshold: 0.95 # confidence required before write max_concurrent_queries: 10 nodes: - id: node-primary type: local engine: vllm model: opus-mini-4.8 max_thinking_depth: 7 host: localhost port: 8001 - id: node-secondary type: local engine: ollama model: llama3-70b max_thinking_depth: 5 host: localhost port: 8002 languages: - en - zh - es - ar - hi - fr # Strict Write Discipline settings swd: enabled: true peer_verification_count: 2 escalation_depth_threshold: 5 # Semantic caching cache: enabled: true similarity_threshold: 0.92 max_size_gb: 8 ``` ### Multi-Node Configuration For distributed deployment across multiple machines: ```yaml mesh: name: distributed-lattice consensus_threshold: 0.95 nodes: - id: gpu-node-1 type: remote engine: vllm model: opus-mini-4.8 max_thinking_depth: 7 host: 192.168.1.100 port: 8001 capabilities: - deep-reasoning - multilingual - id: gpu-node-2 type: remote engine: vllm model: mistral-large-2 max_thinking_depth: 6 host: 192.168.1.101 port: 8001 capabilities: - fast-inference - code-generation - id: cpu-node-fallback type: remote engine: llama-cpp model: phi-3-mini max_thinking_depth: 3 host: 192.168.1.102 port: 8001 capabilities: - fallback - low-resource ``` ## Core Usage ### Single-Query Reasoning ```python from logos import Router # Initialize router with configuration router = Router(config="config.yaml") # Simple query with adaptive depth response = router.query( prompt="Explain the halting problem and its implications for AI safety.", depth="adaptive", language="en" ) print(response.text) print(f"Reasoning depth: {response.depth}") print(f"Nodes consulted: {response.nodes_involved}") print(f"Consensus score: {response.consensus_score}") # Access reasoning trail for step in response.trail: print(f"Step {step.index}: {step.summary}") print(f" Node: {step.node_id}") print(f" Verification: {step.verification_score}") ``` ### Explicit Reasoning Depth Control ```python # Force shallow reasoning (fast) quick_response = router.query( prompt="What is 2+2?", depth=1, language="en" ) # Force deep reasoning (thorough) deep_response = router.query( prompt="Analyze the P vs NP problem and recent approaches.", depth=7, language="en" ) # Adaptive with constraints constrained = router.query( prompt="Summarize this research paper.", depth="adaptive", max_depth=4, timeout=30 # seconds ) ``` ### Multilingual Routing ```python # Query in one language, respond in another response = router.query( prompt="解释量子纠缠的基本原理", # Chinese language="zh", output_language="en" ) # Process multilingual context response = router.query( prompt="Compare these documents", context=[ {"text": "English document...", "language": "en"}, {"text": "Document en español...", "language": "es"}, {"text": "文档中文...", "language": "zh"} ], language="auto", output_language="en" ) ``` ### Multi-Step Workflows ```python # Create workflow for complex task task = router.create_workflow("analyze_codebase") # Define workflow steps task.add_step( "extract_functions", prompt="List all functions and their purposes", depth=3 ) task.add_step( "identify_patterns", prompt="Identify architectural patterns", depth=5, depends_on=["extract_functions"] ) task.add_step( "generate_report", prompt="Generate refactoring recommendations", depth=4, depends_on=["identify_patterns"] ) # Execute with consensus verification result = task.execute(consensus=True) # Access intermediate results for step_name, step_result in result.steps.items(): print(f"{step_name}: {step_result.summary}") print(f" Nodes: {step_result.nodes_involved}") ``` ### Document Analysis Workflow ```python # Analyze document with reasoning task = router.create_workflow("paper_analysis") # Load document task.load_document("research_paper.pdf") # Extract claims claims = task.extract_claims(min_confidence=0.8) # Verify each claim with consensus verification = task.verify_claims( claims=claims, consensus=True, verification_sources=["local_knowledge", "reasoning"] ) # Generate summary summary = task.generate_summary( style="academic", length="medium", include_citations=True ) # Execute workflow result = task.execute() print(result.summary.text) print(f"Claims extracted: {len(result.claims)}") print(f"Claims verified: {result.verification.verified_count}") ``` ## Advanced Usage ### Consensus Verification ```python # Enable strict consensus for critical queries response = router.query( prompt="Review this security-critical code change", depth=6, consensus_mode="strict", # requires higher threshold min_peer_verifications=3 ) # Check consensus details if response.consensus_passed: print("Consensus achieved:") for verification in response.verifications: print(f" Node {verification.node_id}: {verification.score}") else: print("Consensus failed - escalating") print(f"Reason: {response.consensus_failure_reason}") ``` ### Causal Audit Trails ```python # Query with full audit trail response = router.query( prompt="Should we refactor this module?", depth="adaptive", audit_trail=True ) # Inspect reasoning chain print("Reasoning Trail:") for i, step in enumerate(response.trail): print(f"\nStep {i+1}:") print(f" Node: {step.node_id}") print(f" Thought: {step.thought}") print(f" Confidence: {step.confidence}") print(f" Verified by: {step.verified_by}") print(f" Causal parent: {step.parent_hash}") print(f" Hash: {step.hash}") ``` ### Custom Reasoning Profiles ```python # Load custom reasoning profile router = Router( config="config.yaml", reasoning_profile="profiles/code_review.json" ) # Create custom profile programmatically custom_profile = { "name": "security-audit", "max_depth": 7, "verification_weight": 0.9, "heuristics": { "prioritize": ["security", "correctness", "edge_cases"], "verification_frequency": "every_step", "escalation_triggers": ["security_concern", "ambiguity"] } } router.load_profile(custom_profile) ``` ### Sandboxed Reasoning Zones ```python # Create isolated reasoning zone zone = router.create_zone("sensitive_analysis") # Execute queries in isolation response1 = zone.query("Analyze proprietary algorithm A") response2 = zone.query("Analyze proprietary algorithm B") # Responses don't cross-contaminate # Zone can be destroyed to clear memory zone.destroy() ``` ### Streaming Reasoning Steps ```python # Stream reasoning steps as they occur for step in router.query_stream( prompt="Explain quantum computing", depth="adaptive" ): print(f"Step {step.index}: {step.text}") print(f" Node: {step.node_id}") print(f" Confidence: {step.confidence}") if step.is_final: print("\nFinal response:") print(step.synthesized_text) ``` ## REST API Usage ### Starting the API Server ```bash # Start router API server python -m logos.server --config config.yaml --port 8000 # With specific host binding python -m logos.server --config config.yaml --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000 ``` ### API Endpoints ```python import requests # Query endpoint response = requests.post("http://localhost:8000/query", json={ "prompt": "Explain recursion", "depth": "adaptive", "language": "en", "consensus": True }) result = response.json() print(result["text"]) print(f"Depth used: {result['depth']}") print(f"Nodes: {result['nodes_involved']}") # Workflow endpoint workflow = requests.post("http://localhost:8000/workflow", json={ "name": "code_analysis", "steps": [ { "id": "extract", "prompt": "Extract all functions", "depth": 3 }, { "id": "analyze", "prompt": "Analyze architecture", "depth": 5, "depends_on": ["extract"] } ] }) workflow_id = workflow.json()["workflow_id"] # Execute workflow execution = requests.post( f"http://localhost:8000/workflow/{workflow_id}/execute", json={"consensus": True} ) # Poll for results status = requests.get(f"http://localhost:8000/workflow/{workflow_id}/status") ``` ## WebSocket Streaming ```python import asyncio import websockets import json async def stream_reasoning(): uri = "ws://localhost:8000/stream" async with websockets.connect(uri) as websocket: # Send query await websocket.send(json.dumps({ "prompt": "Explain neural networks", "depth": "adaptive", "language": "en" })) # Receive reasoning steps async for message in websocket: step = json.loads(message) if step["type"] == "reasoning_step": print(f"Step {step['index']}: {step['text']}") print(f" Confidence: {step['confidence']}") elif step["type"] == "final": print(f"\nFinal: {step['text']}") break elif step["type"] == "error": print(f"Error: {step['message']}") break asyncio.run(stream_reasoning()) ``` ## Monitoring and Debugging ### Mesh Status ```python # Check mesh health status = router.mesh_status() print(f"Mesh: {status.name}") print(f"Active nodes: {status.active_nodes}/{status.total_nodes}") for node in status.nodes:
View on GitHub
This SKILL.md is very large, so SkillsMP previews the first section here. View on GitHub