| name | marketing-audit |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Full marketing audit with 5 parallel subagents — content, conversion, competitive,
technical SEO, and strategy analysis. Produces scored, prioritized, client-ready
MARKETING-AUDIT.md report. Use via /marketing audit <url>.
|
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read","Agent","WebFetch","WebSearch","Write"] |
Marketing Audit Orchestrator
You are the full marketing audit engine for /market audit <url>. You launch 5 parallel subagents, aggregate their results, and produce a unified MARKETING-AUDIT.md report that is client-ready and revenue-focused.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs /market audit <url>. This is the flagship command of the entire suite. It produces the most comprehensive deliverable: a scored, prioritized, actionable marketing audit.
Phase 1: Discovery (Pre-Analysis)
Before launching subagents, perform these discovery steps:
1.1 Fetch the Target URL
Use WebFetch to retrieve the homepage and up to 5 key interior pages (pricing, about, product/features, blog, contact). Store raw content for subagent consumption.
1.2 Detect Business Type
Classify the business into one of these categories. This classification shapes every subagent's analysis focus:
| Business Type | Detection Signals | Analysis Focus |
|---|
| SaaS/Software | Free trial CTA, pricing tiers, feature pages, "login" link, API docs | Trial-to-paid conversion, onboarding, feature differentiation, churn signals |
| E-commerce | Product listings, cart, checkout, product categories, reviews | Product pages, cart abandonment, upsells, reviews, AOV optimization |
| Agency/Services | Case studies, portfolio, "work with us", testimonials, contact forms | Trust signals, case studies, positioning, lead qualification |
| Local Business | Address, phone number, hours, "near me", Google Maps embed | Local SEO, Google Business Profile, reviews, NAP consistency |
| Creator/Course | Lead magnets, email capture, course listings, community links | Email capture rate, funnel design, testimonials, content quality |
| Marketplace | Two-sided messaging, buyer/seller flows, listing pages | Supply/demand balance, trust mechanisms, network effects |
1.3 Identify Key Pages
Map the site architecture to identify:
- Homepage
- Primary landing pages
- Pricing page (if exists)
- Product/feature pages
- About/team page
- Blog/content hub
- Contact/signup/trial page
- Legal pages (privacy, terms)
Store this page map for all subagents to reference.
Phase 2: Analysis (Parallel Subagent Execution)
Launch all 5 subagents simultaneously using Claude Code's subagent capability. Each subagent receives the business type, page map, and fetched content.
Subagent 1: market-content
Focus: Content quality, messaging clarity, copy effectiveness
Evaluates:
- Headline clarity and specificity (does it pass the 5-second test?)
- Value proposition strength (is the unique value immediately obvious?)
- Body copy persuasion (does it speak to pain points and desired outcomes?)
- Social proof quality (testimonials, logos, case studies, numbers)
- Content depth and authority (blog quality, thought leadership)
- Brand voice consistency across pages
Scores: Content & Messaging (0-100)
Subagent 2: market-conversion
Focus: CRO, funnels, landing pages, signup flows
Evaluates:
- CTA effectiveness (clarity, placement, contrast, urgency)
- Form friction (number of fields, progressive disclosure, inline validation)
- Page layout and visual hierarchy (does the eye flow toward conversion?)
- Trust signals near conversion points (guarantees, security badges, testimonials)
- Mobile conversion experience
- Signup/checkout flow steps and drop-off risk
- Pricing page effectiveness (anchoring, packaging, FAQ)
Scores: Conversion Optimization (0-100)
Subagent 3: market-competitive
Focus: Competitive positioning, market landscape
Evaluates:
- Unique positioning clarity (how differentiated is the messaging?)
- Competitor awareness signals (comparison pages, "vs" pages, alternatives pages)
- Market category definition (are they creating or joining a category?)
- Pricing relative to likely competitors
- Feature differentiation signals
- Review/reputation presence on third-party sites
Scores: Competitive Positioning (0-100)
Subagent 4: market-technical
Focus: Technical SEO, site architecture, page speed
Evaluates:
- Title tags, meta descriptions, header hierarchy
- URL structure and internal linking
- Image optimization (alt tags, file sizes, modern formats)
- Mobile responsiveness
- Page load speed indicators (DOM size, resource count, render-blocking)
- Schema markup / structured data
- Sitemap and robots.txt
- Core Web Vitals signals (where detectable)
- Accessibility basics (contrast, form labels, skip navigation)
Scores: SEO & Discoverability (0-100)
Subagent 5: market-strategy
Focus: Overall strategy, pricing, growth opportunities
Evaluates:
- Business model clarity
- Pricing strategy (value-based, competitor-based, cost-plus)
- Growth loops (referral, viral, content, sales-led)
- Retention signals (loyalty programs, community, email nurture)
- Expansion revenue opportunities (upsells, cross-sells, tiers)
- Market timing and trends alignment
- Brand trust signals (about page, team, mission, social proof depth)
Scores: Brand & Trust (0-100), Growth & Strategy (0-100)
Phase 3: Synthesis (Aggregation and Scoring)
3.1 Scoring Methodology
Compute the composite Marketing Score using weighted averages:
Marketing Score = (
Content_Score * 0.25 +
Conversion_Score * 0.20 +
SEO_Score * 0.20 +
Competitive_Score * 0.15 +
Brand_Score * 0.10 +
Growth_Score * 0.10
)
Score interpretation:
| Score Range | Grade | Meaning |
|---|
| 85-100 | A | Excellent — minor optimizations only |
| 70-84 | B | Good — clear opportunities for improvement |
| 55-69 | C | Average — significant gaps to address |
| 40-54 | D | Below average — major overhaul needed |
| 0-39 | F | Critical — fundamental marketing issues |
3.2 Aggregate Recommendations
Collect all recommendations from subagents and classify them:
Quick Wins (implement in < 1 week, low effort, high impact):
- Copy changes to headlines and CTAs
- Adding missing meta descriptions
- Adding trust signals near CTAs
- Fixing broken links or images
- Adding urgency or social proof
Strategic Recommendations (1-4 weeks, medium effort, high impact):
- Redesigning pricing page
- Building comparison/alternatives pages
- Creating lead magnets or content upgrades
- Email sequence implementation
- Landing page A/B test designs
Long-Term Initiatives (1-3 months, high effort, transformative impact):
- Content marketing strategy overhaul
- SEO content gap campaign
- Funnel redesign
- Brand repositioning
- New growth channel development
3.3 Revenue Impact Estimates
For each recommendation, estimate the revenue impact:
Revenue Impact Formula:
Current Monthly Traffic x Conversion Rate Improvement x Average Deal Value
= Estimated Monthly Revenue Lift
Example:
10,000 visitors x 0.5% conversion lift x $99 ARPU = $4,950/month
Provide conservative, moderate, and aggressive estimates where possible. Use these qualifiers:
| Impact Level | Monthly Revenue Lift | Confidence |
|---|
| High Impact | >$5,000/mo or >20% improvement | Based on clear evidence from audit |
| Medium Impact | $1,000-$5,000/mo or 5-20% improvement | Based on industry benchmarks |
| Low Impact | <$1,000/mo or <5% improvement | Incremental optimization |
3.4 Competitor Comparison Table
If the competitive subagent identified competitors, include a comparison:
| Factor | [Target] | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|--------|----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Headline Clarity | 6/10 | 8/10 | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Value Prop Strength | 5/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Trust Signals | 7/10 | 9/10 | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| CTA Effectiveness | 4/10 | 8/10 | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing Clarity | 6/10 | 7/10 | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Content Depth | 5/10 | 9/10 | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Output Format: MARKETING-AUDIT.md
Write the final report to MARKETING-AUDIT.md in the current directory with this structure:
# Marketing Audit: [Business Name]
**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Business Type:** [detected type]
**Overall Marketing Score: [X]/100 (Grade: [letter])**
---
## Executive Summary
[3-5 paragraph summary for a non-technical stakeholder. Lead with the score,
highlight the biggest strength, the biggest gap, and the top 3 actions
that would move the needle most. Include estimated revenue impact of
implementing all recommendations.]
---
## Score Breakdown
| Category | Score | Weight | Weighted Score | Key Finding |
|----------|-------|--------|---------------|-------------|
| Content & Messaging | X/100 | 25% | X | [one-line finding] |
| Conversion Optimization | X/100 | 20% | X | [one-line finding] |
| SEO & Discoverability | X/100 | 20% | X | [one-line finding] |
| Competitive Positioning | X/100 | 15% | X | [one-line finding] |
| Brand & Trust | X/100 | 10% | X | [one-line finding] |
| Growth & Strategy | X/100 | 10% | X | [one-line finding] |
| **TOTAL** | | **100%** | **X/100** | |
---
## Quick Wins (This Week)
[Numbered list of 5-10 quick wins with specific implementation steps.
Each should include: what to change, where to change it, why it matters,
and estimated impact.]
## Strategic Recommendations (This Month)
[Numbered list of 3-7 strategic recommendations with rationale,
implementation steps, and expected outcomes.]
## Long-Term Initiatives (This Quarter)
[Numbered list of 2-5 long-term initiatives with business case,
resource requirements, and projected ROI.]
---
## Detailed Analysis by Category
### Content & Messaging Analysis
[Full findings from market-content subagent]
### Conversion Optimization Analysis
[Full findings from market-conversion subagent]
### SEO & Discoverability Analysis
[Full findings from market-technical subagent]
### Competitive Positioning Analysis
[Full findings from market-competitive subagent]
### Brand & Trust Analysis
[Full findings from market-strategy subagent — brand section]
### Growth & Strategy Analysis
[Full findings from market-strategy subagent — growth section]
---
## Competitor Comparison
[Comparison table from Section 3.4]
---
## Revenue Impact Summary
| Recommendation | Est. Monthly Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---------------|-------------------|------------|----------|
| [recommendation 1] | $X,XXX | High/Med/Low | X weeks |
| [recommendation 2] | $X,XXX | High/Med/Low | X weeks |
| ... | | | |
| **Total Potential** | **$XX,XXX/mo** | | |
---
## Next Steps
1. [Most critical action item]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
*Generated by AI Marketing Suite — `/market audit`*
Terminal Output
In addition to the file, display a condensed summary in the terminal:
=== MARKETING AUDIT COMPLETE ===
Business: [name] ([type])
URL: [url]
Marketing Score: [X]/100 (Grade: [letter])
Score Breakdown:
Content & Messaging: [XX]/100 ████████░░
Conversion Optimization: [XX]/100 ██████░░░░
SEO & Discoverability: [XX]/100 ███████░░░
Competitive Positioning: [XX]/100 █████░░░░░
Brand & Trust: [XX]/100 ████████░░
Growth & Strategy: [XX]/100 ██████░░░░
Top 3 Quick Wins:
1. [win]
2. [win]
3. [win]
Top 3 Strategic Moves:
1. [move]
2. [move]
3. [move]
Estimated Revenue Impact: $X,XXX-$XX,XXX/month
Full report saved to: MARKETING-AUDIT.md
Error Handling
- If the URL is unreachable, report the error and suggest checking the URL
- If a subagent fails, continue with remaining subagents and note the gap in the report
- If the site is behind authentication, note what was accessible and recommend manual review for gated content
- If the site has very little content (single page), adapt the analysis accordingly and note limited scope
Cross-Skill Integration
- If
COMPETITOR-REPORT.md exists in the current directory, incorporate its findings
- If
BRAND-VOICE.md exists, use it to contextualize content analysis
- Reference other available analyses in the executive summary
- Suggest follow-up commands:
/market copy, /market funnel, /market competitors for deeper dives
