| name | 0.2.6-understand-network_partition |
| description | [0.2.6] Connectivity loss between node subgroups preventing inter-group communication. |
understand-network_partition
CALL NUMBER: deep_consensus.network_partition : distributed_consensus_and_replication_protocols(8), deep_raft(6)
DEFINITION: Connectivity loss between node subgroups preventing inter-group communication.
Invoke this skill to understand network_partition down to its primitives. The RELATIVE ROOT below is the least-fixed-point closure of everything it bundles from — the full import cone, grouped by the lib each prim comes from. Projected from a prover-typed KB (MAP/SWI-Prolog consistency gate): every reference below resolves.
THE RELATIVE ROOT (the import cone, by lib)
from ?
- agreement (d5): The property that a set of distributed processes reach the same decision outcome on a given value. Uniform agreement requires all processes including those that later crash to decide identically; asymmetric agreement permits different decision classes for different process roles such as primary versus backup.
from deep_consensus
- availability (d2): Probability system remains operational and accessible despite failures.
- safety (d2): Property requiring system never reaches inconsistent or invalid state.
- liveness (d3): Property requiring system to eventually respond or make progress under fair conditions.
- quorum_read (d3): Reading from sufficient replicas to guarantee seeing latest write.
- quorum_write (d3): Writing to sufficient replicas to guarantee subsequent readers see the value.
- replication_factor (d3): Count of replica copies maintained for durability and availability.
- strong_quorum (d3): Quorum where read and write quorums overlap (r + w > n).
from deep_raft
- a007 (d5): Quorum in agreement: a subset of processes sufficient to guarantee agreement can be reached, typically intersecting any valid quorum to ensure overlap.
- a008 (d5): Threshold in agreement: the minimum number of correct processes required to guarantee safety and liveness under given failure assumptions.
- a009 (d6): Asymmetric agreement: one class of processes (e.g., primary) must agree while another class (e.g., backups) may reach different decisions, used in primary-backup protocols.
- a002 (d6): Validity in agreement: the decided value must have been proposed by some process in the system, guaranteeing agreements are grounded in actual proposals.
- a005 (d7): Uniform agreement: all processes including those that later fail must decide on the same value, stricter than ordinary agreement which only binds correct processes.
- a004 (d7): Termination in agreement: every correct process eventually decides some value, ensuring the protocol makes progress and does not stall indefinitely.
from distributed_consensus_and_replication_protocols
- split_brain (d1): Scenario where network partition causes multiple nodes to believe they are leader; resolved by quorum.
- quorum (d2): Subset of nodes sufficient for reads or writes; typically majority (n/2+1) for strong consistency.
- linearizability (d3): Strongest consistency model: every operation appears atomic and ordered in real time across all nodes.
- semi_synchronous_replication (d3): Write waits for quorum of replicas to acknowledge; balances latency and durability.
- synchronous_replication (d3): Write waits for all replicas to acknowledge before returning to client.
- consensus (d4): Agreement on a single value among a set of distributed processes; the core problem consensus protocols solve.
- fault_tolerance (d5): System's ability to continue operating correctly despite component failures.
- replicated_log (d6): Ordered log of commands maintained across replicas; foundation of state machine replication.
CONSUMERS (what needs this)
cap_partition_tolerance, failure_mode
Projected from the distributed consensus and replication protocols KB (196 concepts / 187 relations) — consistency-typed by MAP; the facet list after the colon IS the cross-lib dependency web.
(leaf — this is an actual skill.)
