Skip to main content

team

Spin up a native Claude Code Teams fleet to tackle a multi-step task — lead orchestrates, specialists work in parallel worktrees, critic + verifier loop guards quality. Use when the task has 3+ independent sub-tasks, when you need different specialists, or when isolation between concerns is required. Triggers on /team, "spin up a team", "fan out", "fleet this".

Source facts

Repository
sethdford/claude-code-teams
Last source activity
May 10, 2026 at 15:17
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
0
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
team
description
Spin up a native Claude Code Teams fleet to tackle a multi-step task — lead orchestrates, specialists work in parallel worktrees, critic + verifier loop guards quality. Use when the task has 3+ independent sub-tasks, when you need different specialists, or when isolation between concerns is required. Triggers on /team, "spin up a team", "fan out", "fleet this".
when_to_use
Use for tasks with 3+ independent units of work that benefit from specialization. Do NOT use for trivial single-file fixes or tasks with heavy shared state — sequential is faster.
allowed-tools
Agent, Task, TodoWrite, Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Skill
arguments
["goal"]
# /team — Native Claude Code Teams Orchestrator `/team <goal>` runs the closed-loop multi-agent protocol from `~/.claude/rules/agent-team-os.md` end-to-end with native primitives. Replaces Shipwright; depends only on the Claude Code harness. ## The protocol you run ``` 1. SCOPE — distill goal into 3–8 testable contracts (with user) 2. PLAN — write the plan; identify which contracts are independent (parallel) vs sequential 3. SPAWN — Agent tool with isolation: worktree, model: sonnet, tools scoped to role 4. WATCH — TodoWrite tracks tasks; agents report back via TaskUpdate 5. VERIFY — for each task close, spawn verifier (model: sonnet) 6. CRITIQUE — every N completions, spawn critic to find half-fixes & cross-agent regressions 7. REFLEX — recurring failures from same agent → spawn agent-tuner with /tune-agent 8. MERGE — git diff each worktree, merge sequentially with tests between, surface conflicts 9. CLOSE — write closing report + update knowledge + run /mine-transcripts on this session ``` ## Hard rules - **Never** call `TeamDelete`, `git worktree remove`, or `ExitWorktree` until **after** all branches are merged. See `rules/worktree-merge-before-cleanup.md`. - **Never** mark a task complete without `RESULT_verifier=PASS`. - **Never** skip the critic on the closure of CRITICAL or REGRESSION-tagged tasks. - **Always** keep the active task list in `TodoWrite` — every spawn updates it. - **Always** report cost+token totals in the closing summary. If the run cost >$10, flag it. ## Step-by-step ### Step 1 — Scope (with user) - Distill the goal into 3–8 testable contracts. Each contract is one sentence: "X must do Y when Z." - If you can't list ≥3 contracts, the goal is too small for /team — just do it. - Confirm with the user before spawning anyone. ### Step 2 — Plan - Group contracts into independent vs sequential clusters. - For each cluster, decide: which specialist(s) handle this? - General task → `general-purpose` - Migration → `migration-planner` - Bug regression → `regression-hunter` - Perf → `latency-profiler` - Security → `security-reviewer` - (See `~/.claude/agents/` for the full roster — match agent description to task.) - Write the plan inline in this conversation. Don't burn context with a separate plan file unless the user wants one. ### Step 3 — Spawn For each independent unit: ``` Agent({ description: "<short description>", subagent_type: "general-purpose", // or specialist isolation: "worktree", // ALWAYS for implementation tasks prompt: "..." // include: contract, file paths, no-go zones, when to /verify }) ``` For parallel dispatch: emit multiple `Agent` calls in a SINGLE message. Don't sequentially await unless there's a real dependency. ### Step 4 — Watch - `TodoWrite` immediately after spawn: each task in_progress - When an agent reports back, mark its task completed (after verify passes) - If the user asks for a status, just `TodoWrite` view + a 2-line summary ### Step 5 — Verify (per task close) - Spawn `/verify` (which spawns the `verifier` agent) - Read `RESULT_verifier=...` - PASS → `TodoWrite` mark complete - FAIL → keep task open, surface the failure, prompt the responsible agent to fix - INCONCLUSIVE → escalate to user; do not silently pass ### Step 6 — Critique (every 3 completions, or at fleet end) - Spawn the `critic` agent (read-only) with the list of just-completed tasks - Critic returns CRITICAL / HIGH / MED findings; CRITICAL ones become new tasks (CRITIC- prefix) - Critic also checks for cross-agent regressions: did Agent A's change break Agent B's work? ### Step 7 — Reflexion (only if pattern emerges) - If verifier or critic finds the SAME failure mode from the SAME agent twice, that's a tuning candidate - Spawn `/tune-agent <agent-name>` with the failure evidence - It proposes a prompt patch; you (lead) approve or reject - Approved patches land in the agent's `.md` with backup at `~/.claude/agents/.history/` ### Step 8 — Merge - `git worktree list` shows all branches - For each: `git diff <main>..<branch>`, then merge - After every merge, run the project's test suite — surface failures immediately - DO NOT remove worktrees until all merges complete ### Step 9 — Close - Write a closing report to the conversation: - Goal recap, contracts satisfied (link to evidence) - Tasks: completed / deferred (with reason) - Critic findings: addressed / accepted as known issues - Cost / tokens / wall time - Lessons learned (auto-extracted from this session) - Run `/mine-transcripts --since 1h` to capture this fleet's lessons - Update `~/.claude/knowledge/connections/` if a new architectural insight emerged ## Output discipline - Status updates: 2 lines max per teammate update — don't paste their work back to the user - Use `TodoWrite` as the source of truth, not chat narration - Closing report under 500 words ## Common failure modes you must avoid 1. **Spawning a fleet for a 1-hour task** — overhead exceeds value 2. **Spawning agents without contracts** — they thrash because they can't tell when they're done 3. **Skipping verifier because "it obviously works"** — that exact phrase has cost users tens of hours 4. **Removing worktrees before merge** — destroys all the agent's work 5. **Critic running on unrelated work** — scope the critic to just-closed tasks 6. **Letting the critic loop run forever** — cap at 3 critic passes; remaining findings become explicit deferred tasks
View on GitHub