Skip to main content

testing-strategy

Selects the narrowest sufficient test boundary from requirements, repository evidence, and maintenance cost. Use when deciding integration or E2E coverage.

Source facts

Repository
shinpr/agentic-code
Last source activity
August 29, 2026 at 05:31
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
50
Forks
4

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
testing-strategy
description
Selects the narrowest sufficient test boundary from requirements, repository evidence, and maintenance cost. Use when deciding integration or E2E coverage.
# Test Strategy ## Purpose Select tests that prove an observable requirement at the lowest sufficient cost. Candidate discovery does not create an obligation to implement every technically valid test. ## Selection Process For each acceptance criterion that may require integration or E2E proof: 1. **Name the observable boundary**: Identify the interaction, persisted effect, process, or user journey that must be proven. 2. **Check existing proof**: Reuse or extend an established test when it already observes the required behavior. 3. **Select the narrowest level**: - use a unit or local check for isolated behavior; - use integration when the requirement depends on a named component, persistence, or process boundary; - use E2E only when the complete journey is itself the requirement. 4. **Compare cost**: Consider setup, execution time, brittleness, maintenance, and diagnostic value using repository evidence rather than fixed universal scores. 5. **Retain necessary proof**: Select a test only when a cheaper boundary cannot establish the required behavior or protect an accepted contract. No new integration or E2E test is a valid conclusion when existing or cheaper proof is sufficient. ## Priority Prioritize proof for: - core user or consumer journeys; - shared or public contracts; - persisted state transitions; - security, authorization, compliance, or irreversible effects; - integrations with demonstrated failure risk. Priority does not determine test level. Use the narrowest boundary that can observe the prioritized behavior. ## Deduplication Before adding a test: - search the existing suite for equivalent behavior; - identify overlapping proof at other levels; - extend existing coverage when that remains clear and maintainable; - keep one representative proof when several candidates observe the same risk. ## Selection Record Record only decisions needed by planning or review: ```text Acceptance criterion: [identifier or behavior] Selected proof: existing | local | integration | E2E | none Boundary observed: [observable interaction or result] Reason: [why this is the narrowest sufficient proof] ``` ## Completion Check - Every selected test traces to an observable requirement or accepted contract. - A cheaper sufficient boundary was considered. - Existing proof was reused where sufficient.
View on GitHub