reconcile-execution

name	reconcile-execution
description	Reviews one completed feature or subfeature against final implementation and slice artifacts, then records a durable reconciliation block before archive.

Reconcile Execution

Use this skill after all planned slices for one feature or subfeature are closed, and before archival.

Responsibilities

1. Review the completed implementation against the canonical system-design.md.
2. Compare scope-level design claims with the completed slice blueprints, validation evidence, and caller-visible behavior.
3. Update system-design.md so intentional execution drift is either removed or documented explicitly.
4. Record a durable reconciliation block in system-design.md that declares the scope aligned and names the planned slice IDs reviewed.

Preferred Input

• one feature slug, subfeature slug, or planning packet path
• the target system-design.md
• the target slice-planning.md
• the target slice-traceability.md
• completed execution slice blueprints and closure evidence

Required Durable Output

Write one reconciliation block in the target system-design.md:

<!-- execution-reconciliation:start -->
Status: aligned
Reviewed Planned Slice IDs: slice-a, slice-b
Summary:
- scope-level design and completed slice execution have been reconciled
<!-- execution-reconciliation:end -->

Rules:

• Status must be aligned
• Reviewed Planned Slice IDs must name every completed planned slice that the archive step will summarize
• keep the summary concise and behavioral rather than process-heavy

Workflow

1. Resolve the feature or subfeature scope.
2. Read system-design.md, slice-planning.md, slice-traceability.md, and the completed slice blueprints.
3. Check for drift in API contracts, UML, lifecycle behavior, and operator-visible outcomes.
4. Update system-design.md until it matches the final behavior or explicitly explains any intentional deviation.
   • When the final design relies on sequence-heavy execution behavior, keep at least one structural class/component-style diagram in the canonical system-design.md so later archive summaries do not have to invent that context.
5. Add or refresh the reconciliation block with Status: aligned and the full set of reviewed planned slice IDs.

Guardrails

• Do not archive slices from this skill.
• Do not treat archived summaries as a substitute for reconciling the canonical system-design.md.
• Do not mark the reconciliation block aligned while known behavior drift is still unresolved.
• Do not defer missing structural context to archive-artifacts; preserve or add the canonical class/component-style diagram here when execution depends on it.
• Keep the reconciliation record generic and durable; avoid project-local review ceremony or tracker-specific fields.