| name | issue-triage-followup |
| description | Re-review an already-triaged batpred GitHub issue in light of information added since the original triage, and post a follow-up comment updating the assessment if warranted. |
| allowed-tools | You can view and edit files in this repo, run local tests, download and grep issue attachments, access the issue in github with 'gh' and use git commands to check history and re-sync the clone. Do not go outside this sandbox or push any changes back to git. |
Issue Triage Follow-up
You are re-reviewing one already-triaged GitHub issue on springfall2008/batpred, incorporating anything added since the bot's previous triage comment. The working directory is a dedicated local clone of the repo โ investigate using it directly.
Arguments: <issue-number> [scratch=<dir>], same convention as /issue-triage. If no scratch= is given (an interactive invocation), use /tmp/predbat-triage/<issue-number> and mkdir -p it yourself.
1. Read the issue and find what's new
Fetch it with gh issue view <number> --json title,body,labels,comments. Find the bot's most recent prior comment (opens with "automated first-pass triage" or "automated follow-up triage review"). Everything posted after that comment โ reporter replies, new logs, a maintainer's note โ is the new information this review exists to act on.
If there's nothing posted since the last bot comment, say so plainly in your follow-up comment rather than inventing a reason to change anything.
2. Fetch any new attachments
Same as /issue-triage step 2: if the new information links a log file, a predbat_debug.yaml, or a zip of either, download it into the scratch directory and size/grep it rather than reading it whole.
3. Re-investigate against current main
-
Sync the clone first, so you are reading the code you think you are:
git fetch origin main && git checkout main && git reset --hard origin/main && git clean -fd
git describe --tags
-
Read ../issue-triage/references/debug-journal.md before revising your assessment.
-
Re-check git log/git blame on the relevant area โ the fix may have landed on main since the original triage.
-
If the new information points at a test module, run it via tools/triage_test.sh <name> <scratch>/test.log (never the full suite).
4. Decide whether the assessment changes
Compare your updated understanding against the original triage comment's classification, priority, and root-cause pointer:
- If nothing material changed, say so โ confirming the original assessment still holds is a legitimate outcome, not a reason to avoid posting.
- If the classification, priority, or root-cause should change given the new information, update it. You may change or remove a label you previously applied as the bot (classification, priority,
waiting_for_user) โ never remove a label a human added.
- Apply the same duplicate check as
/issue-triage step 4 if the new information suggests one.
5. Post one follow-up comment
Check the comment history first: if the most recent comment is already a bot comment with nothing from a human posted after it, stop โ this review already happened and nothing new has arrived since.
Post exactly one comment via gh issue comment <number> --body "...", opening with a line disclosing this is an automated follow-up triage review (a maintainer will review before any action is taken), followed by: what was new since the last review, whether the classification/priority/root-cause changed and why (or confirmation nothing changed), and any further information request.
Do not touch the BOT_TRIAGED or BOT_REVIEW labels โ the daemon manages both.
Guardrails
- Analysis only: no commits, no pushes, no PRs, no code changes that leave this clone.
- Never remove a label a human applied; you may only revise labels the bot itself applied.
- Never close an issue except a confident duplicate.
- If a command you needed was blocked by permissions, say plainly in the comment what you could not do โ never word it so a step you skipped reads as one you completed.
