Skip to main content

domain-model-lint

Run modelith lint on a domain model and explain the findings — a read-only review pass. Use when the user asks to check, validate, or review a *.modelith.yaml file, or wants to know what is missing or inconsistent. Turns the linter output into a prioritized, actionable summary. To actually change the model (add or edit entities, fix the gaps), use domain-model-author.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
stacklok/modelith
Last source activity
July 27, 2026 at 00:48
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
30
Forks
5

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
domain-model-lint
description
Run modelith lint on a domain model and explain the findings — a read-only review pass. Use when the user asks to check, validate, or review a *.modelith.yaml file, or wants to know what is missing or inconsistent. Turns the linter output into a prioritized, actionable summary. To actually change the model (add or edit entities, fix the gaps), use domain-model-author.
# Linting a domain model Run the linter and interpret it for the user. The point is not a clean bill of health — it's making gaps *visible* so the user can decide whether they matter. ## Run it First confirm `modelith` is installed (`modelith --version`); if it is not on `PATH`, tell the user to install it before going further — don't eyeball the YAML in its place: ```sh go install github.com/stacklok/modelith/cmd/modelith@latest # or download a binary from https://github.com/stacklok/modelith/releases ``` ```sh modelith lint <file>... # human-readable modelith lint --format json <file> # when you need to parse findings ``` Use `--completeness error` only if the user wants gaps to be treated as hard failures (e.g. a strict CI gate). It promotes the **completeness** warnings (the advisory gaps listed below) to blocking errors. It does **not** affect semantic errors — those (including a dangling `invariants_touched` id) block regardless of the flag. ## Interpret the three layers - **Structural (error).** The file violates the JSON Schema — wrong type, missing required field, bad `cardinality` — or names a cross-model reference (`scope.Name`) in `relationship.entity` or `subtypeOf`, which is not supported anywhere but an attribute `type`. Must be fixed; the model won't parse cleanly otherwise. - **Semantic (error or warning).** Errors (always block, flag-independent): a relationship points at an entity that doesn't exist; a scenario's `invariants_touched` or an action's `preserves` names an invariant id no entity or top-level `invariants` entry declares; the same invariant id is declared twice (entity-level and top-level invariants share one id namespace); reciprocal cardinalities that aren't inverses; reciprocal declarations that both claim `ownership: owned`; an `imports` entry that's absolute, unreadable, not a domain model, binds a scope another entry already bound, resolves outside the repository holding this model, is a bare path whose filename yields no valid scope slug, has a path containing a control character, or declares a schema version this modelith doesn't support; an attribute `type` containing a dot that isn't a well-formed `scope.Name` (a dot is always reserved for a cross-model reference — `decimal(10.2)` and `google.protobuf.Timestamp` are errors, not primitives); a `scope.Name` type whose scope no import binds, or that names no enum in the model it resolves to. Warnings: a backticked term resolves to no entity, role, or actor; an action `actor` that's neither an entity nor a glossary term; a PascalCase attribute `type` that names no defined enum — usually a typo or a concept that was never named; a relationship `role` written as prose, which belongs in `note`; an ambiguous reciprocal pairing, where one end declares the same relationship twice and the other declares it back. Decide which it is and propose the fix. - **Completeness (advisory warning).** Gaps, not bugs: an entity with no invariants, an entity no scenario exercises, a glossary term defined but never referenced, an enum no attribute uses, or an import nothing references. `shared: true` on the model being linted relaxes the two vocabulary-only checks (the unused glossary term and unused enum) — it does not relax the invariant or scenario-coverage checks, and it does nothing for an unreferenced import (that check is about *this* model's own `imports`, not about being imported). These are what `--completeness error` promotes to blocking. For each, ask whether it's a real gap (write the missing invariant or scenario, or drop the unused import) or genuinely fine — a `shared: true` model in particular. ## How to report back 1. Lead with **errors** — these block. Give the fix for each. 2. Then **semantic warnings** — likely typos or missing definitions. 3. Then **completeness gaps**, framed as questions: "Nothing exercises `Policy` in a scenario — should there be one, or is it intentionally a supporting concept?" Don't just dump the linter output. Prioritize, explain *why* each matters, and propose concrete edits. If the user agrees, use the `domain-model-author` skill to make them, then re-lint and re-render.
View on GitHub