Menu
AI screening review for PRs - preliminary check before human review. Do NOT use for deep multi-reviewer code quality audits (use /audit instead).
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
issue が build に投入できる形かを検分し、verdict (build-ready / needs-plan / needs-fix) と指摘を返す。起票には使わない (/issue)。PR のスクリーニングには使わない (/preview)。
Inspect whether an issue is in shape to hand to build, returning a verdict (build-ready / needs-plan / needs-fix) and the findings. Do NOT use to file an issue (use /issue) or to screen a PR (use /preview).
critic-design による敵対的批判を伴う設計探索。生き残った案を構造化 plan にまとめ、自己点検して呼び出し元に返す。plan の永続先は issue の Plan 節が唯一。計画意図のないコードベース調査には使わない (代わりに /research)。
Design exploration with adversarial critique by critic-design. Assembles the surviving approach into a structured plan, self-checks it, and returns it to the caller. The issue's Plan section is the plan's only persistent home. Do NOT use for codebase investigation without planning intent (use /research instead).
構造化されたタイトルと本文で GitHub Issue を生成する。単独で成立し、前段を要求しない。challenge / research の成果物が会話にあれば本文の根拠に使い、/think の plan 下書きがあれば `## Plan` 節へ移設する。issue 番号を渡すと、起票済みで Plan 節を持たない issue へ plan を転記する。
Generate GitHub Issue with structured title and body. Standalone; requires no upstream stage. When challenge / research artifacts exist in the conversation, they feed the body's evidence; when a /think plan draft exists, it is transferred into the `## Plan` section. Given an issue number, it transfers a plan into a filed issue that has no Plan section.
| name | preview |
| description | AI screening review for PRs - preliminary check before human review. Do NOT use for deep multi-reviewer code quality audits (use /audit instead). |
| when_to_use | スクリーニング, PRレビュー, プレビュー, preview PR, pre-review |
| allowed-tools | Bash(git:*) Bash(gh:*) Read AskUserQuestion Bash(ugrep:*) Bash(bfs:*) |
| model | opus |
| argument-hint | [PR URL or number] |
$ARGUMENTS is a URL, a number, or empty. If empty, detect from the current branch.
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json number,title,body,labels,files,url. On failure, retry without $ARGUMENTSgit status --porcelaingh pr checkout $PRNever include author in gh output fields.
# Diff
gh pr diff $PR
# Existing comments
gh pr view --comments $PR
# Inline comments
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments \
--jq '.[] | {file: .path, user: .user.login, comment: .body}'
| Label | Meaning | Severity |
|---|---|---|
[must] | Requires fix before merge | High |
[want] | Should fix, not blocking | Medium |
[imo] | Personal opinion, take or leave | Low |
[ask] | Question needing clarification | - |
[nits] | Minor style/formatting issue | Low |
[info] | Context sharing, no action | - |
| Rule | Detail |
|---|---|
| Format | [label] <observed behavior or risk>. <suggestion>. (file:line) |
| Concise | 3 lines for [imo]/[nits]/[info]; up to 5 for [must]/[want] with evidence |
| Respectful | Acknowledge effort, avoid commands |
| Suggestive | "Consider..." not "This is wrong" |
| Author-targeted | Comments may be posted verbatim - calibrate detail for the PR author |
Generate the report from the ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/templates/screening-report.md skeleton and emit it to the conversation.
| Rule | Detail |
|---|---|
| No auto-post | Never post comments to PR automatically |
| Abort on dirty | If uncommitted changes exist, warn and abort |
| Speed over depth | This is screening, not full audit |
| Verify before flag | Before [ask]/[want]+, trace the issue to a reachable runtime call site |
| Topic | File |
|---|---|
| Review Checklist | ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/review-checklist.md |