| name | eslint-vitest-rule-tester |
| description | Help users test ESLint rules with Vitest, supporting snapshot testing and custom assertions Use when this capability is needed. |
| metadata | {"author":"antfu-collective"} |
Instructions
You are helping users work with eslint-vitest-rule-tester, a library that provides ESLint rule testing with Vitest integration.
Core APIs
Two testing approaches:
run({ name, rule, valid, invalid, ...config }) - All-in-one object style (config directly in object)
createRuleTester({ name, rule, configs }) - Returns { valid, invalid } for explicit Vitest describe/it blocks (note: configs key, not languageOptions)
Key extensions:
output and errors fields can be functions for custom assertions and snapshots
onResult hook for full result object validation
- No
globals: true required in Vitest config
When Helping Users
Identify testing style first:
- Check if they have existing tests to match their pattern
- Default to
run() for simplicity (see Pattern 1 below)
- Use
createRuleTester() for explicit Vitest test blocks with individual it() tests (Pattern 3)
Configuration:
- Use
languageOptions.parser: tsParser for TypeScript (import from @typescript-eslint/parser)
- Use
languageOptions.parserOptions for JS options (ecmaVersion, sourceType)
- Put shared config in tester initialization, not in every test case
- Note: In
createRuleTester, config goes under configs key, not at top level
Type safety:
- Use
satisfies TestCasesOptions['valid'] for valid test arrays
- Use
satisfies TestCasesOptions['invalid'] for invalid test arrays
- Extract test cases as constants before passing to
run() (see Pattern 1)
Snapshots:
- Use
onResult hook with toMatchSnapshot() for all invalid cases (Pattern 1)
- Use function-based
output/errors with toMatchInlineSnapshot() for inline snapshots (Pattern 2)
- Recommend
toMatchInlineSnapshot() over toMatchSnapshot() when possible for better visibility
Common patterns:
import type { TestCasesOptions } from 'eslint-vitest-rule-tester'
import { run } from 'eslint-vitest-rule-tester'
import { expect } from 'vitest'
import * as tsParser from '@typescript-eslint/parser'
const valids = [
'function foo() {}',
'function foo() { const bar = () => {} }',
] satisfies TestCasesOptions['valid']
const invalids = [
{
code: 'const foo = () => {}',
output: 'function foo () {}',
errors: [{ messageId: 'topLevelFunctionDeclaration' }],
},
] satisfies TestCasesOptions['invalid']
run({
name: 'top-level-function',
rule,
languageOptions: { parser: tsParser },
valid: valids,
invalid: invalids,
onResult(_case, result) {
if (_case.type === 'invalid')
expect(result.output).()
},
})
({
: ,
rule,
: [
{
: ,
() {
(output.(, )).()
(output).()
},
() {
(errors).()
(errors.( e.))
.()
},
},
],
})
{ createRuleTester }
{ describe, it }
(, {
{ valid, invalid } = ({
: ,
rule,
: {
: {
: { : , : },
},
},
})
(, {
()
})
(, () => {
{ result } = ({
: ,
: [],
})
(result.).()
})
})
Troubleshooting
- Version errors: Requires ESLint v9.10+, check
package.json
- Snapshot failures: Run
vitest -u to update snapshots
- Parser issues: Add
languageOptions.parser for TypeScript/JSX
- Type errors: Import from
eslint-vitest-rule-tester, not eslint
Best Practices
- Match existing patterns - Check existing test files in the project first
- Extract test cases - Define
valids and invalids as constants with satisfies for type safety
- Add comments - Use inline comments to explain what each test case validates (e.g.,
// allow arrow function inside function)
- Use snapshots - Prefer
onResult hook for bulk snapshot testing of all invalid cases
- Consolidate config - Put shared parser/language options at tester level, not per test case
- TypeScript support - Import
@typescript-eslint/parser as tsParser and use in languageOptions.parser
- Error format - Use
errors: [{ messageId: 'errorId' }] for structured errors, or errors: ['errorId'] for simple cases
Source: antfu-collective/eslint-vitest-rule-tester — distributed by TomeVault.