swift

name	swift
description	Swift development — writing, reviewing, and rating Swift code for iOS/macOS. Trigger keywords: swift, iOS, macOS, xcode, swiftui, uikit, swift code review. Use when this capability is needed.

Swift — iOS/macOS Development

Guidelines for writing, reviewing, and rating Swift code.

Code Style

Naming

• Types: UpperCamelCase — struct MessageView, class NetworkManager
• Functions/properties: lowerCamelCase — func fetchMessages(), var isLoading
• Constants: lowerCamelCase — let maxRetries = 3
• Protocols: Describe capability — Codable, Sendable, MessageHandling

Structure

• One type per file (matching filename)
• Use extensions to organize protocol conformances
• Prefer struct over class unless reference semantics are needed
• Prefer let over var unless mutation is required

Modern Swift Patterns

• Use async/await over completion handlers
• Use Actor for thread-safe mutable state
• Use @Observable (iOS 17+) or ObservableObject for state management
• Use structured concurrency (TaskGroup, async let) over DispatchQueue
• Use Codable for serialization
• Use Result type for error handling in non-async contexts

SwiftUI Conventions

struct ContentView: View {
    @State private var items: [Item] = []

    var body: some View {
        List(items) { item in
            ItemRow(item: item)
        }
        .task {
            items = await fetchItems()
        }
    }
}

• Extract subviews when body exceeds ~30 lines
• Use @State for local view state, @Binding for parent-owned state
• Use .task {} for async work on view appear
• Prefer NavigationStack over deprecated NavigationView

Code Review Checklist

When reviewing or rating Swift code, check:

1. Safety: No force unwraps (!) unless guaranteed — prefer guard let / if let
2. Memory: No retain cycles — use [weak self] in closures that capture self
3. Concurrency: Proper @Sendable conformance, no data races
4. Error handling: do/catch with specific error types, not bare try?
5. API design: Clear parameter labels, consistent naming
6. Performance: Avoid unnecessary allocations in hot paths
7. Accessibility: VoiceOver labels, Dynamic Type support
8. Testing: Protocols for dependency injection, testable architecture

Rating Scale

When asked to rate Swift code:

Rating	Meaning
A	Production-ready, follows all conventions, well-tested
B	Good with minor issues — missing docs, small style inconsistencies
C	Functional but has code smells — force unwraps, retain cycles, unclear naming
D	Significant issues — race conditions, memory leaks, no error handling
F	Broken or dangerous — crashes, security vulnerabilities, undefined behavior

---

Source: CorvidLabs/corvid-agent — distributed by TomeVault.