Skip to main content

api-gateway-patterns

Design and implement API gateway layers with YARP, Ocelot, Azure API Management, and resilient .NET traffic-control patterns.

Source facts

Repository
visionarycoder/vc.Agentic
Last source activity
November 9, 2026 at 06:22
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
0
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
api-gateway-patterns
description
Design and implement API gateway layers with YARP, Ocelot, Azure API Management, and resilient .NET traffic-control patterns.
metadata
{"metadata-version":"1.0.0","title":"API Gateway Patterns","document-type":"skill","repository":"vc.Agentic","language":"Standard Technical English","updated":"2026-11-08","collection":"optional"}
# API Gateway Patterns Agent designs gateway layers with explicit routing, bounded transforms, and observable traffic controls. ## When to Use | Condition | Use | |---|---| | Work adds a reverse proxy, edge gateway, or BFF for multiple downstream APIs | Use this skill | | Work asks for YARP, Ocelot, or Azure API Management design | Use this skill | | Work centralizes auth delegation, throttling, transformation, or aggregation at ingress | Use this skill | | Work compares gateway and service-mesh responsibilities | Use this skill | ## When Not to Use | Condition | Route | |---|---| | Work changes one API with no cross-service ingress layer | Edit the API directly | | Work needs east-west traffic policy inside the cluster only | Use service-mesh or platform networking guidance | | Work adds static-file or CDN rules with no API routing logic | Use the matching edge-configuration path | | Work hardens one outbound HTTP client inside an app service | Use `dotnet-api-client-resilience` | ## Required Inputs | Input | Required | Notes | |---|---|---| | Downstream inventory | Yes | Record services, route groups, protocols, and ownership boundaries. | | Traffic goals | Yes | Record routing, aggregation, throttling, auth delegation, or transformation goals. | | Deployment topology | Yes | Record self-hosted ASP.NET Core, Azure-hosted edge, container platform, or hybrid topology. | | Failure posture | Yes | Record timeout budget, breaker thresholds, retry ownership, and fallback intent. | | Consumer set | No | Record web, mobile, partner, internal, or admin clients. | ## Pattern Matrix | Scenario | Preferred Pattern | Guardrail | Pass Target | |---|---|---|---| | In-process .NET reverse proxy with custom middleware | YARP | Keep policy code bounded and observable | Route and transform logic stay explicit in the gateway service | | Config-centric gateway with built-in aggregation conventions | Ocelot | Keep extension scope narrow | Route and aggregation config match the intended contract | | Managed external edge with subscriptions, products, and portal | Azure API Management | Keep platform and app responsibilities separate | Edge policies live in APIM with clear ownership | | Managed external edge plus internal BFF composition | APIM plus YARP | Record which layer owns auth, throttling, and transforms | Cross-layer policy stays non-duplicative | | Public ingress plus internal service policy | Gateway plus service mesh | Keep north-south and east-west ownership explicit | Gateway owns ingress and mesh owns service-to-service policy | ## Workflow | Step | Agent Action | Test | Pass | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | Agent selects YARP, Ocelot, APIM, or a layered combination. | Review deployment and policy needs. | One explicit gateway stack exists for the scope. | | 2 | Agent defines route matching, destination clusters, health probes, and load balancing. | Review route and cluster configuration. | Ingress paths map to the intended downstream targets. | | 3 | Agent applies transforms, aggregation, and BFF composition only where the caller contract needs them. | Inspect transform and aggregator code or config. | Gateway logic stays contract-focused and bounded. | | 4 | Agent wires auth delegation, rate limiting, and resilience ownership intentionally. | Review auth, limiter, timeout, and breaker configuration. | Cross-cutting policies appear once in the chosen layer. | | 5 | Agent adds observability for route selection, latency, breaker state, and rejection outcomes. | Inspect logs, traces, metrics, and health endpoints. | Traffic and failure states remain observable. | | 6 | Agent validates routing, throttling, aggregation, and failure behavior. | Run targeted build and gateway tests. | Build passes and representative ingress flows pass. | ## Rules | Topic | Rule | |---|---| | Boundary ownership | Keep business logic in downstream services. Keep ingress, composition, and cross-cutting policy in the gateway. | | Route transforms | Use request and response transforms only when the contract requires them. | | Retry safety | Avoid automatic retries for non-idempotent requests unless the design defines idempotency. | | Aggregation | Aggregate a small set of latency-related calls with explicit failure semantics. | | Policy duplication | Avoid conflicting auth or quota enforcement across APIM, YARP, and downstream APIs. | | Observability | Propagate correlation and capture downstream timing and failure classification. | ## Verification Checklist | Check | Test | Pass | |---|---|---| | Route coverage | Call representative upstream routes. | Requests reach the intended downstream service or cluster. | | Load balancing | Send repeated requests across healthy destinations. | Distribution follows the selected policy. | | Transform correctness | Inspect outbound headers, path, query, and body shape. | Downstream receives the intended transformed contract. | | Rate limiting | Exceed one client-facing quota path. | Excess requests return the intended rejection result. | | Auth delegation | Call protected routes with valid, missing, and insufficient credentials. | Gateway returns the intended auth outcome and forwards only intended identity context. | | Breaker and timeout behavior | Simulate slow or failed downstream responses. | Gateway short-circuits or rejects per configuration. | | Observability | Inspect logs, traces, metrics, and health signals. | Route selection, latency, and failures stay observable. | ## Outputs - Gateway stack selection for YARP, Ocelot, APIM, or a layered design - Route, cluster, and load-balancing plan - Transformation, aggregation, and BFF contract plan - Auth delegation, throttling, and resilience ownership plan - Verification evidence for routing, failure behavior, and observability
View on GitHub