| name | architecture-paradigms |
| description | Interactive selector and router for architecture paradigms |
| version | 1.8.2 |
| triggers | ["architecture","patterns","selection","implementation","adr"] |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"homepage":"https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market/tree/master/plugins/archetypes","emoji":"🦞","requires":{"config":"[Truncated]"}}} |
| source | claude-night-market |
| source_plugin | archetypes |
Night Market Skill — ported from claude-night-market/archetypes. For the full experience with agents, hooks, and commands, install the Claude Code plugin.
Table of Contents
Architecture Paradigm Router
This skill helps you select the right architecture paradigm(s) for your system, then routes you to the specific paradigm skill for implementation details.
Quick Scenario Router
Match your needs to the recommended paradigm:
| Your Scenario | Primary Paradigm | Load Skill |
|---|
| Enterprise app with multiple teams | Microservices or Modular Monolith | architecture-paradigm-microservices or architecture-paradigm-modular-monolith |
| Complex business rules & testing | Functional Core, Imperative Shell | architecture-paradigm-functional-core |
| Real-time/event processing | Event-Driven Architecture | architecture-paradigm-event-driven |
| Legacy system modernization | Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters) | architecture-paradigm-hexagonal |
| Cloud-native/bursty workloads | Serverless | architecture-paradigm-serverless |
| ETL/data processing pipeline | Pipeline Architecture | architecture-paradigm-pipeline |
| Simple CRUD app | Layered Architecture | architecture-paradigm-layered |
| Command/query separation | CQRS + Event Sourcing | architecture-paradigm-cqrs-es |
3-Step Selection Workflow
Step 1: Define Your Needs
Primary Concerns (select all that apply):
- Testability: Isolate business logic →
functional-core or hexagonal
- Team Autonomy: Independent deployment →
microservices or modular-monolith
- Infrastructure Flexibility: Swap databases/frameworks →
hexagonal
- Real-time Scaling: Variable loads with events →
event-driven or space-based
- Simplicity: Maintainable without complexity →
layered or modular-monolith
- Legacy Integration: Work with existing systems →
hexagonal or microkernel
System Context:
- Team Size:
< 5 → Layered/Functional Core | 5-15 → Modular Monolith | 15-50 → Microservices | 50+ → Microservices/Space-Based
- Domain Complexity:
Simple → Layered | Moderate → Hexagonal/Modular Monolith | Complex → Functional Core/CQRS | Highly Complex → Microservices/Event-Driven
Step 2: Evaluate Paradigms
Based on your needs from Step 1, review these options:
For Testability & Business Logic
- Load
architecture-paradigm-functional-core - Isolates business logic from infrastructure
- Load
architecture-paradigm-hexagonal - Clear domain/infrastructure boundaries
For Team Autonomy
- Load
architecture-paradigm-microservices - Independent deployment and scaling
- Load
architecture-paradigm-modular-monolith - Team autonomy without distributed complexity
For Infrastructure Flexibility
- Load
architecture-paradigm-hexagonal - Swap infrastructure without domain changes
For Simplicity & Maintainability
- Load
architecture-paradigm-layered - Simple, well-understood separation
For Real-time Event Processing
- Load
architecture-paradigm-event-driven - Scalable, decoupled processing
- Load
architecture-paradigm-space-based - In-memory data grids for linear scalability
For Legacy Integration
- Load
architecture-paradigm-microkernel - Plugin architecture for extensible platforms
- Load
architecture-paradigm-hexagonal - Adapters for external systems
Step 3: Load Paradigm Skill for Implementation
Once you've selected your paradigm(s), load the specific skill for detailed guidance:
Skill(archetypes:architecture-paradigm-hexagonal)
The individual paradigm skill provides:
- ✅ Complete implementation guide
- ✅ ADR templates
- ✅ Migration checklist
- ✅ Code examples
- ✅ Testing strategies
- ✅ Risk assessments
Available Paradigm Skills
| Paradigm | Complexity | Team Size | Best For | Skill Name |
|---|
| Functional Core | Medium | Small-Large | Complex business logic | architecture-paradigm-functional-core |
| Hexagonal | Medium | Small-Large | Infrastructure changes | architecture-paradigm-hexagonal |
| Layered | Low | Small-Medium | Simple domains | architecture-paradigm-layered |
| Modular Monolith | Medium | Medium-Large | Evolving systems | architecture-paradigm-modular-monolith |
| Microservices | High | Large | Complex domains | architecture-paradigm-microservices |
| Event-Driven | High | Medium-Large | Real-time processing | architecture-paradigm-event-driven |
| CQRS + ES | High | Medium-Large | Audit trails | architecture-paradigm-cqrs-es |
| Service-Based | Medium | Medium | Coarse-grained services | architecture-paradigm-service-based |
| Serverless | Medium | Small-Medium | Cloud-native/bursty | architecture-paradigm-serverless |
| Microkernel | Medium | Small-Medium | Plugin systems | architecture-paradigm-microkernel |
| Space-Based | High | Large | Linear scalability | architecture-paradigm-space-based |
| Pipeline | Low | Small-Medium | ETL workflows | architecture-paradigm-pipeline |
Integration with Other Skills
- Architecture Review: Use this skill first to select paradigms, then
/architecture-review for evaluation
- Implementation Planning: Select paradigms here, then
/writing-plans for detailed task breakdown
- Refactoring: Identify target paradigms here, then use paradigm-specific skills for migration strategies
Exit Criteria
Next Steps
- Load the specific paradigm skill - Use
Skill(archetypes:architecture-paradigm-NAME)
- Generate an ADR - Use the paradigm's ADR templates
- Create implementation plan - Use paradigm's migration checklist
- Set up monitoring - Track success metrics from paradigm guidance