Skip to main content

review-fix-loop

Use when user says "review and fix", "review until clean", "run reviewer and fix", "keep reviewing until good", or wants iterative subagent review with automatic fixes applied between rounds. Works on specs, code, docs — any reviewable artifact.

Source facts

Repository
webiny/data-transfer
Last source activity
July 30, 2026 at 12:29
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
1
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
review-fix-loop
description
Use when user says "review and fix", "review until clean", "run reviewer and fix", "keep reviewing until good", or wants iterative subagent review with automatic fixes applied between rounds. Works on specs, code, docs — any reviewable artifact.
# Review-Fix Loop Spawn a reviewer subagent, fix findings, re-review until clean. Max 5 rounds. ## Process ```dot digraph review_fix_loop { "Spawn reviewer" [shape=box]; "Findings?" [shape=diamond]; "Fix all findings" [shape=box]; "Max rounds?" [shape=diamond]; "Done — clean" [shape=doublecircle]; "Done — cap hit" [shape=doublecircle]; "Spawn reviewer" -> "Findings?"; "Findings?" -> "Done — clean" [label="none"]; "Findings?" -> "Fix all findings" [label="yes"]; "Fix all findings" -> "Max rounds?" ; "Max rounds?" -> "Spawn reviewer" [label="no"]; "Max rounds?" -> "Done — cap hit" [label="5 rounds"]; } ``` ### 1. First review Spawn `cavecrew-reviewer` with: - Target file(s) and what to check - Instruction to verify against actual codebase (not just the file in isolation) - `run_in_background: false` (need results to proceed) - **Do NOT use the Agent tool or spawn subagents.** ### 2. Fix Read findings. Apply all fixes to the file(s). No partial fixes — address every finding before re-reviewing. ### 3. Re-review Spawn `cavecrew-reviewer` again with: - Same target file(s) - List of what was fixed from previous round (so reviewer verifies fixes landed AND checks for new issues) - Same instruction to verify against codebase - **Do NOT use the Agent tool or spawn subagents.** ### 4. Repeat or exit - **Clean (no findings):** Done. Report to user. - **Findings remain:** Fix and re-review (go to step 2). - **5 rounds reached:** Stop. Report remaining issues to user — something may need human judgment. ## Reviewer prompt template ``` [Review/Re-review] this [file type]: [path] [First round: describe what to check] [Re-review: list previous findings and which were fixed. Ask reviewer to verify fixes AND find new issues.] Check against actual codebase, not just the file text. [If clean, say "Clean — no issues."] IMPORTANT: Do NOT use the Agent tool or spawn subagents. ``` ## Key behaviors - **Always run reviewer synchronously** (`run_in_background: false`) — need findings before fixing. - **Fix ALL findings before re-review** — partial fixes waste review rounds. - **Pass previous findings to re-reviewer** — reviewer needs context to verify fixes and avoid re-reporting. - **Report round count** — tell user "Clean after N rounds" or "Stopped at 5 rounds, N issues remain." - **Reviewer must NEVER spawn subagents** — always include "Do NOT use the Agent tool" in the prompt.
View on GitHub