vc-review-situation

name	vc-review-situation
description	Use when you need a read-only situation review and handoff summary of current branch state, local/remote refs, worktrees, active project plans, selected-plan hints, and suggested next checks.
license	MIT
argument-hint	[--json] [--fetch] [--selected-plan <path>] [--cwd <path>]
trigger_keywords	what's in flight, handoff, worktree status, active plans, next steps
layer	helper
metadata	{"author":"vibecode-pro-max-kit","version":"1.0.0"}

Review Situation

Output style: lead with the bottom line, bullets over prose, one-line TL;DR — process/development-protocols/communication-standards.md.

Summarize the current repo state for handoff and resume work.

This is a helper skill only.

• Do use it for read-only branch, worktree, and active-plan summaries.
• Do use it to surface likely selected-plan context when it can be proven or safely hinted.
• Do not use it to choose a plan authoritatively.
• Do not use it to approve execution, resume execution, or mutate repo/process state.

Mode Selection

vc-review-situation operates in two modes. Choose based on the trigger signals below.

Simple Mode (default)

Run review-situation-scan.cjs, return the scan summary.

Use when:

• User asks "what's in flight", "what's next", "give me a handoff summary"
• Quick orientation needed at the start of a session
• Orchestrator needs a branch/plan status check before routing

Output: Current State, Recent Work, In-Flight Plans, Next Steps, Warnings (standard scan sections).

Deep Mode

Run the scan plus read umbrella plan, latest phase report, and all active-plan handoff sections. Synthesize into a full handoff briefing sufficient for an agent to resume without follow-up questions.

Trigger conditions (any one):

• User asks for a full program review: "what are we building", "summarize all active plans", "where are we in the program"
• Session is resuming after a long break or context compaction occurred
• Orchestrator needs a thorough handoff before routing to a phase agent
• Caller explicitly requests deep mode
• Program Review Mode is active — Program Review Mode is Deep Mode

Deep mode steps:

1. Run review-situation-scan.cjs as normal (get branch state + active plan list)
2. If a phase program is active: read the umbrella plan in full — especially ## Current Execution State and ## Phase Ordering
3. Read the most recent phase report in full (if it exists)
4. If 3+ phases are completed: read the Forward Preview sections from earlier phase reports
5. For each active plan: read the ## Resume and Execution Handoff section
6. Synthesize: "You are at Phase N of M. Phase N-1 completed with these outputs. The next phase needs to know: X. These are the open gaps from prior phases: Y."

Output: Full handoff briefing — program position, prior-phase outputs, open gaps, next-phase inputs, and any hard-stop conditions.

---

Core Contract

vc-review-situation is advisory.

• Evidence comes from git, worktree metadata, and process/* plan inventory.
• Selected-plan awareness is a hint, not a command.
• Next-step recommendations are suggestions, not workflow gates.

If a user needs execution, the repo still requires explicit plan selection and ENTER EXECUTE MODE.

Invocation

Run the local scanner:

node .claude/skills/vc-review-situation/scripts/review-situation-scan.cjs --json

Useful flags:

node .claude/skills/vc-review-situation/scripts/review-situation-scan.cjs
node .claude/skills/vc-review-situation/scripts/review-situation-scan.cjs --json --max-branches 8 --plan-limit 6
node .claude/skills/vc-review-situation/scripts/review-situation-scan.cjs --selected-plan process/general-plans/active/example_27-05-26/example_PLAN_27-05-26.md
node .claude/skills/vc-review-situation/scripts/review-situation-scan.cjs --since "14 days ago"
node .claude/skills/vc-review-situation/scripts/review-situation-scan.cjs --fetch

Input Sources

The scanner reads from:

• git status --short --branch
• git worktree list --porcelain
• local and remote branch refs plus sampled recent commits
• process/general-plans/active/ (plans inside {slug}_{date}/ task subfolders — scan one level deep)
• process/features/*/active/ (same depth)
• optional session-state hints if a local session id is present

It does not scan upstream plans/**, and it never treats a selected-plan hint as execute authority.

Output Shape

The default output is a human-readable report with these sections:

• Current State
• Recent Work
• In-Flight Plans
• Next Steps
• Warnings

--json returns the same information as structured data.

If the scanner fails, say that explicitly and fall back to the minimal read-only commands:

git status --short --branch
git worktree list --porcelain
git for-each-ref --format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:iso8601) %(objectname:short) %(subject)' refs/heads refs/remotes
find process/general-plans/active process/features -path '*/active/*' -type f | sort

Safety Rules

1. Read-only only. No branch switching, plan edits, or fetch unless --fetch is explicit.
2. Treat selected-plan inference as tentative unless it came from an explicit --selected-plan argument.
3. Remote branch data is stale-by-default unless --fetch is explicit.
4. Use this for session handoff and quick repo orientation, not for workflow control.
5. If the scan cannot prove something, emit a warning instead of guessing.

Good trigger phrases:

• what's in flight
• give me a handoff summary
• what active plans do we have
• show branch and worktree status
• what should I look at next

Load references/review-situation-workflow.md when you need the project's decision tree or hint-priority rules.

Program Review Mode

Program Review Mode = Deep Mode. All trigger conditions and synthesis steps from the Mode Selection — Deep Mode section apply here. The output format below is the required presentation layer for Deep Mode when the orchestrator or user needs a full visual summary before execution.

Trigger: User asks for plan review, program summary, "what are we building", "summarize all active plans"

Goal: Read ALL active plans for a program and produce a comprehensive visual summary for user feedback before execution.

Required output elements

• Macro goal + specific phase goals
• All important decisions made (DECISION / WHY / REJECTED format)
• Expected behaviors being hardened (before/after tables)
• Phase sequence with dependencies (ASCII box diagram using ─ │ ┌ ┐ └ ┘ ├ ┤ ┬ ┴ ┼ ► → characters — NEVER mermaid)
• Per-phase summary: purpose, key items, exit gate, dependencies, risks
• Validate contract status
• Gaps / out-of-scope items
• End with: "Anything to modify before execution?"

Output format rules

• Use ASCII box diagrams (─ │ ┌ ┐ └ ┘ ├ ┤ ┬ ┴ ┼ ► → characters) for phase sequence diagrams and dependency flows — NEVER mermaid (mermaid does not render in terminal)
• Use ASCII/markdown tables for before/after behavior comparisons
• Use numbered decision logs (DECISION / WHY / REJECTED)
• Never omit important details — output is for user feedback before execution
• End with: "Anything to modify before execution?"

Process steps

1. Run standard vc-review-situation check (branch, worktree, active plans list)
2. Identify target program (user-specified feature folder or all active plans)
3. Read ALL plan files in program fully (umbrella + all phase plans)
4. Extract: macro goal, per-phase goals, decisions, behavior changes, validate contract status
5. Produce visual summary using ASCII diagrams + markdown tables
6. Prompt for feedback

Artifact Review Mode

Read and compare process artifacts (plan file + validate-contract, or plan vs git diff) and produce a concise inline summary.

• Plan + validate-contract comparison: Read the plan file and its embedded validate-contract section; render a side-by-side summary of what was planned vs what the contract locked in, flagging gaps or conflicts.
• Plan vs diff view: Read the specified plan file and run git diff [ref] to show what changed; map changed files against the plan's blast-radius, highlighting covered vs uncovered areas.
• File viewer: Read any process artifact (plan, report, validate-contract) and emit a clean inline summary with key decisions, open items, and exit gates — useful before passing context to an execute subagent.
• Output format: ASCII tables and prose only — no Mermaid, no HTML, no server. Output is terminal-friendly and safe to paste into a subagent prompt.
• Trigger phrases: review the plan, show plan vs contract, what did we plan vs what changed, summarize this plan file, diff plan against code