Conditional document-review persona, selected when the document has >5 requirements or implementation units, makes significant architectural decisions, covers high-stakes domains, or proposes new abstractions. Challenges premises, surfaces unstated…
ybbms777/compound-engineering
SkillsMP has collected 61 skills from ybbms777/compound-engineering. Open a skill to review its source and details.
- Latest recorded source activity
- SkillsMP catalog refreshed
- skills collected
- 61
- GitHub stars
- 1
- GitHub forks
- 0
Skills in this repository
Showing 40 of 61 collected skills.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff is large (>=50 changed lines) or touches high-risk domains like auth, payments, data mutations, or external APIs. Actively constructs failure scenarios to break the implementation rather than checking…
Reviews code to ensure agent-native parity -- any action a user can take, an agent can also take. Use after adding UI features, agent tools, or system prompts.
Creates or updates README files following Ankane-style template for Ruby gems. Use when writing gem documentation with imperative voice, concise prose, and standard section ordering.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches API routes, request/response types, serialization, versioning, or exported type signatures. Reviews code for breaking contract changes.
Analyzes code changes from an architectural perspective for pattern compliance and design integrity. Use when reviewing PRs, adding services, or evaluating structural refactors.
Researches and synthesizes external best practices, documentation, and examples for any technology or framework. Use when you need industry standards, community conventions, or implementation guidance.
Systematically reproduces and validates bug reports to confirm whether reported behavior is an actual bug. Use when you receive a bug report or issue that needs verification.
Reviews CLI source code, plans, or specs for AI agent readiness using a severity-based rubric focused on whether a CLI is merely usable by agents or genuinely optimized for them.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches CLI command definitions, argument parsing, or command handler implementations. Reviews CLI code for agent readiness -- how well the CLI serves autonomous agents, not just human users.
Final review pass to ensure code is as simple and minimal as possible. Use after implementation is complete to identify YAGNI violations and simplification opportunities.
Reviews planning documents for internal consistency -- contradictions between sections, terminology drift, structural issues, and ambiguity where readers would diverge. Spawned by the document-review skill.
Always-on code-review persona. Reviews code for logic errors, edge cases, state management bugs, error propagation failures, and intent-vs-implementation mismatches.
Reviews database migrations, data models, and persistent data code for safety. Use when checking migration safety, data constraints, transaction boundaries, or privacy compliance.
Validates data migrations, backfills, and production data transformations against reality. Use when PRs involve ID mappings, column renames, enum conversions, or schema changes.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches migration files, schema changes, data transformations, or backfill scripts. Reviews code for data integrity and migration safety.
Produces Go/No-Go deployment checklists with SQL verification queries, rollback procedures, and monitoring plans. Use when PRs touch production data, migrations, or risky data changes.
Visually compares live UI implementation against Figma designs and provides detailed feedback on discrepancies. Use after writing or modifying HTML/CSS/React components to verify design fidelity.
Iteratively refines UI design through N screenshot-analyze-improve cycles. Use PROACTIVELY when design changes aren't coming together after 1-2 attempts, or when user requests iterative refinement.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when Rails diffs introduce architectural choices, abstractions, or frontend patterns that may fight the framework. Reviews code from an opinionated DHH perspective.
Detects and fixes visual differences between a web implementation and its Figma design. Use iteratively when syncing implementation to match Figma specs.
Gathers comprehensive documentation and best practices for frameworks, libraries, or dependencies. Use when you need official docs, version-specific constraints, or implementation patterns.
Performs archaeological analysis of git history to trace code evolution, identify contributors, and understand why code patterns exist. Use when you need historical context for code changes.
Fetches and analyzes GitHub issues to surface recurring themes, pain patterns, and severity trends. Use when understanding a project's issue landscape, analyzing bug patterns for ideation, or summarizing what users are reporting.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches async UI code, Stimulus/Turbo lifecycles, or DOM-timing-sensitive frontend behavior. Reviews code for race conditions and janky UI failure modes.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches Python code. Reviews changes with Kieran's strict bar for Pythonic clarity, type hints, and maintainability.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches Rails application code. Reviews Rails changes with Kieran's strict bar for clarity, conventions, and maintainability.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches TypeScript code. Reviews changes with Kieran's strict bar for type safety, clarity, and maintainability.
Searches docs/solutions/ for relevant past solutions by frontmatter metadata. Use before implementing features or fixing problems to surface institutional knowledge and prevent repeated mistakes.
Use this agent when you need to run linting and code quality checks on Ruby and ERB files. Run before pushing to origin.
Always-on code-review persona. Reviews code for premature abstraction, unnecessary indirection, dead code, coupling between unrelated modules, and naming that obscures intent.
Analyzes code for design patterns, anti-patterns, naming conventions, and duplication. Use when checking codebase consistency or verifying new code follows established patterns.
Analyzes code for performance bottlenecks, algorithmic complexity, database queries, memory usage, and scalability. Use after implementing features or when performance concerns arise.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches database queries, loop-heavy data transforms, caching layers, or I/O-intensive paths. Reviews code for runtime performance and scalability issues.
Evaluates and resolves one or more related PR review threads -- assesses validity, implements fixes, and returns structured summaries with reply text. Spawned by the resolve-pr-feedback skill.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when reviewing a PR that has existing review comments or review threads. Checks whether prior feedback has been addressed in the current diff.
Reviews planning documents as a senior product leader -- challenges premise claims, assesses strategic consequences (trajectory, identity, adoption, opportunity cost), and surfaces goal-work misalignment. Domain-agnostic: users may be end users, developers,…
Always-on code-review persona. Audits changes against the project's own CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md standards -- frontmatter rules, reference inclusion, naming conventions, cross-platform portability, and tool selection policies.
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches error handling, retries, circuit breakers, timeouts, health checks, background jobs, or async handlers. Reviews code for production reliability and failure modes.
Conducts thorough research on repository structure, documentation, conventions, and implementation patterns. Use when onboarding to a new codebase or understanding project conventions.