Menu
SkillsMP has collected 961 skills from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Open a skill to review its source and details.
Showing 40 of 961 collected skills.
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a…
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case,…
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
Assumption Destruction Campaign — open new solution spaces by negating, reversing, and challenging fundamental assumptions.
SOTA Performance Baseline Campaign — 5 strategies for systematically collecting, standardizing, and analyzing performance data across methods. Produces standardized comparison tables, progress curves, and headroom analysis.
Evaluation Methodology Archaeology Campaign — 5 strategies for systematic analysis of AI/ML benchmarks, metrics, and leaderboards. Reveals construct validity issues, saturation, data contamination, and evaluation protocol inconsistencies.
Biomimicry Campaign — discover transferable solutions from biological systems via Design Spiral, BioTRIZ, functional analogy, ecosystem patterns, and evolution strategies.
Boundary Analysis Campaign — probe where methods fail, map validity envelopes, test robustness, catalog failure modes, detect scaling limits. 5 strategies, 3 tactics, 11 subagent SOPs.
Campaign for building causal models — identify variables, map mechanisms, collect evidence, analyze interventions, validate models. Produces causal graphs in the wiki vault.
Combinatorial Creativity Campaign — produce emergent concepts via concept blending, multi-level bisociation, and function combination (Fauconnier-Turner)
What limits us — identify bottlenecks, quantify constraints, analyze dependencies, resolve conflicts before experiment execution
Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Covers both process and results with genuine substance. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a…
Multi-Criteria Scoring Campaign — evaluate and rank candidates against multiple weighted criteria using AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, MAUT methods.
Portfolio Optimization Campaign — select balanced combinations from candidate sets optimizing value, diversity, risk, and robustness using Markowitz, Knapsack, Pareto, Real Options, MAP-Elites, and minimax regret methods.
Campaign: Counterfactual reasoning to identify load-bearing factors. Core question: If key factors were different, would the conclusion still hold? Methods: Pearl SCM Three-Step, Lewis Possible Worlds, Tetlock & Belkin, PNS/PS.
Cross-Domain Discovery Campaign — find transferable mechanisms from unrelated fields via bisociation, analogical transfer, random stimulus, and forced bridging
Sensitivity Analysis Campaign — identify which assumptions are most critical by measuring their impact on conclusions. 5 strategies (parameter-screening, variance-decomposition, assumption-criticality, uncertainty-propagation, decision-sensitivity), 3…
Campaign for mapping design spaces — discover dimensions/axes, enumerate combinations, identify gaps and novel opportunities. Produces dimensional maps in the wiki vault.
Execute a Research Spec step by step, respecting context protocol, deviation limits, and backtrack rules. Supports multi-session recovery.
Transform validated hypotheses into rigorous, executable experiment designs
Source text: Mixed languages
Campaign: Forward-looking failure analysis combining pre-mortem rapid screening with systematic FMEA deep-dive. Core question: If this artifact fails, how will it fail? Methods: Klein Pre-Mortem 2007, AIAG-VDA FMEA 2019, IEC 60812.
Campaign: Truth-seeking adversarial validation for scientific research artifacts (NOT publication defense). Core question: Where have we fooled ourselves, and is each load-bearing claim even falsifiable? Win-condition is INVERTED from survival/resilience to…
Feasibility Assessment Campaign — evaluate whether selected candidates can actually be implemented using TRL, NASSS, Stage-Gate, TRIZ, TOC, and parametric estimation methods.
Gap Analysis Campaign — identify, classify, validate, and prioritize research gaps via systematic evidence mapping. 5 strategies (gap-identification, gap-classification, gap-validation, gap-prioritization, gap-synthesis), 3 tactics, 12 subagent SOPs.
Campaign: Systematically assess and rank research gaps, determining the targets most worth attacking
Campaign: transform insights and gaps into structured testable hypotheses
Insight Campaign — deep root-cause analysis of why research gaps persist. 5 strategies (root-cause-drilling, stakeholder-mapping, tension-mining, question-reformulation, assumption-audit), 4 tactics, 13 subagent SOPs.
Lateral Thinking Campaign — escape logical thinking tracks via PO/movement, random entry, concept fan, challenge, and six hats (de Bono)
Autonomous Literature Survey Campaign — 5 research paradigms (scoping, systematic, deep, narrative, snowball) with quantitative budget enforcement. Selects and executes the right survey paradigm based on research intent.
Mechanism-Gap Hunting Campaign — hunt the specific link where scientific progress is BLOCKED, not where literature is empty. Use this instead of gap-analysis whenever the goal is truth-seeking / AI4S research rather than finding a publishable white-space —…
Cross-Study Statistical Synthesis Campaign — 5 strategies for systematic collection and methodological planning of multi-study evidence synthesis. Covers pairwise, network, cumulative meta-analysis, heterogeneity investigation, and bias detection. Stops at…
Morphological Exploration Campaign — systematic dimension-combination enumeration to discover unexplored solution spaces via Zwicky box, CCA, and GMA
Campaign: Multi-agent structured debate for adversarial validation. Core question: Can this artifact survive structured adversarial debate? Methods: Irving AI Safety via Debate, Du Society of Mind, Liang MAD, Toulmin Argumentation, D3 framework.
Goal-Driven Requirement Refinement Engine for Research. Crystallize a user's fuzzy research intent into a North Star statement and structured ResearchBrief through adaptive dialogue and on-demand investigation.
Campaign for building domain ontologies — systematic concept extraction, relation typing, taxonomy construction, and iterative refinement. Produces a structured concept hierarchy in the wiki vault.
Pairwise Ranking Campaign — produce global rankings through pairwise comparisons and voting aggregation using Bradley-Terry, Elo, TrueSkill, Condorcet, Borda, Schulze methods.
Systematic Patent Analysis Campaign — 5 strategies for patent landscape analysis, prior art search, white space identification, competitive intelligence, and claim analysis. Produces structured patent intelligence reports.
Perspective Forcing Campaign — discover hidden solutions by systematically switching viewpoints via roles, six hats, temporal projection, and constraint injection
Problem Reformulation Campaign — question the problem itself. Escape dominant ideas, reframe from multiple perspectives, apply dialectical inquiry, assess wickedness, discover appreciative alternatives. 5 strategies, 3 tactics, 10 subagent SOPs.
Strategy: Systematic adversarial probing retuned for truth-seeking. Threat surface = the set of load-bearing claims. Output is NOT a resilience score and NOT a hardening list — it is, per claim, the specific observation/computation that would refute it, plus…