rhetorical-structure-quality

name	rhetorical-structure-quality
description	(Proposal, unverified) Judge whether argumentative relations between unit-classification's rhetorical labels actually hold in a paper (e.g. is an AIM label adequately substantiated by BACKGROUND labels) — a second-order quality judgment over already-classified units, not raw text. Use this after unit-classification has labeled a paper's units with a rhetorical/argumentative label set, when the user wants to know if the paper's argument structure is actually sound, not just what role each sentence plays.
version	1.0.0
category	paper-reading
type	sop
execution	subagent
prompt	./prompt.md
input	classified_units (list of {unit_text, offset, label})
output	argument_relations (list of {label_a, label_b, relation_holds, justification})
dependencies	{"sops":["spawn-agent"]}

Rhetorical Structure Quality (Proposal)

Second-order SOP: judges whether rhetorical/argumentative labels (from unit-classification) actually substantiate each other, e.g. AIM vs BACKGROUND. Fills a gap in the evaluative-stance × content-layer matrix (quality-judgment × argumentative-rhetorical-role) that no verified method covers — this is a design proposal, not a transcription of an established methodology.

Execution

Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill.

Proposal Status — Read Before Modifying

This SOP has no primary-source precedent (unlike CoreSC/AZ, which it consumes labels from). Its description explicitly says "(Proposal, unverified)" so it is never triggered with the same implied confidence as a verified method. Do not remove that qualifier from the description without re-validating the method against real usage first.

Available SOPs

SOP	When to use
spawn-agent	Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access.