| name | inductive-hypothesis-generation |
| description | Strategy: induce and distill hypotheses from data/observations |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | strategy |
| campaign | hypothesis-formulation |
| tactics | ["anomaly-driven-abduction","falsifiability-audit"] |
| sops | ["anomaly-characterization","explanation-generation","variable-identification","relationship-specification","falsifiability-check"] |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["anomaly-driven-abduction","falsifiability-audit"],"sops":["hypothesis-formation-variable-identification","relationship-specification"]} |
Inductive Hypothesis Generation
Induce and distill hypotheses from data/observations: in domains with theoretical gaps or insufficient theory, distill regularities from empirical patterns and cautiously generalize them into testable propositions.
When to Use
- The domain lacks mature theory but has accumulated abundant empirical observations or data patterns
- The research gap appears as "a recurring phenomenon with no systematic explanation yet"
- The goal is to distill regularities from data, laying a foundation for subsequent theory construction
- An exploratory research stage where it is not yet clear which variables matter
Not applicable: domains that already have a clear theoretical framework → use deductive-hypothesis-generation instead.
Thinking Framework
Observe patterns → Extract regularity → Generalize cautiously → Formulate testable claim
The core logic of induction:
- Observe patterns: systematically organize patterns that recur across existing observations, data, and cases (not single anomalies)
- Extract regularity: identify the regularity behind the patterns — under what conditions it appears, under what conditions it does not
- Generalize cautiously: cautiously generalize the regularity from the specific samples — make the boundary of generalization explicit, do not over-extrapolate
- Formulate testable claim: turn the generalized regularity into a proposition that can be tested on new samples
The core risk of induction: over-generalization (jumping from a limited sample to a universal law). Each inductive hypothesis must make explicit:
- Which samples the observations come from (sample characteristics, source, time range)
- Which population it generalizes to (the boundary of generalization scope)
- What evidence would limit or refute the generalization
Budget Gate
| Tier | Pattern coverage | Regularity extraction | Hypothesis yield | Generalization boundary |
|---|
| S | ≥3 independent observation patterns | ≥2 regularities | ≥2 structured hypotheses | Each hypothesis specifies its sample source |
| M | ≥5 independent observation patterns | ≥3 regularities | ≥3 structured hypotheses | Generalization boundary + falsification scenario |