Generate alternative model formulations by relaxing, replacing, or generalizing specific assumptions.
Skills in this repository
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - Page 7
SkillsMP has collected 961 skills from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Open a skill to review its source and details.
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineShowing 40 of 961 collected skills.
Score each candidate alternative against all criteria to produce a score matrix.
Generate alternatives for every known approach โ ensure no approach goes unchallenged.
Systematic structure-mapping from source to target domain (Gentner). Identify relational correspondences and transfer higher-order constraints.
Chain analogies to deeper levels (3-5 layers). Each layer reveals new aspects and insights not visible at the surface.
Assess analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic). Determines whether an analogy warrants transfer investment.
KAOS-style recursive goal decomposition. AND decomposition for sub-goals that must ALL be satisfied. OR decomposition for alternative paths where any one suffices. Produces a GoalTree (DAG structure).
Tactic: Inductive/abductive path โ describe anomalous phenomena, generate candidate explanations, rank by plausibility
Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks to reveal unexamined constraints.
Search for positive deviants and extract transferable principles using Appreciative Inquiry.
Find positive deviants and reframe the problem from deficit-based to asset-based using Appreciative Inquiry.
Establish acceptability standards through RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method or Consensus Conference protocols.
Distill the strongest arguments from each perspective through Argument Delphi or Dialectical Delphi methods.
Extract and steel-man the core arguments supporting a given opinion cluster.
Strategy for synthesizing argument positions โ aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, produce synthesis reports identifying which claims survive scrutiny.
Rate each identified obstacle's difficulty โ overcomability, time cost, workaround existence. May optionally use search tools to validate assessments.
Standardize assignee names and identify corporate group affiliations across patent offices
Surface all assumptions, classify by vulnerability (load-bearing ร likely-false), validate causal logic. Focus on dangerous assumptions โ high load-bearing + non-explicit.
Tactic: Surface assumptions, sort by dependency, attack root assumptions first, then trace cascade failures through the dependency graph.
Build assumption dependency graphs and trace cascade failures when root assumptions are invalidated.
Challenge each assumption's validity โ shared cross-repo SOP
Which assumptions are most fragile? โ Vulnerability ranking + impact assessment of experiment assumptions
Measure how much conclusions change when each assumption is negated. Ranks assumptions by their impact on the final result.
Systematic extraction, challenge, and sensitivity analysis of assumptions underlying a decision to identify load-bearing beliefs.
Classic reductio ad absurdum: negate the core claim, derive logical consequences, seek contradiction or absurdity.
Systematic stress testing of assumptions โ surface, classify by vulnerability, attack, assess fragility. Combines assumption-surfacing (shared), abp-vulnerability-classification, and clr-validation SOPs.
Compute overall resilience score (0.0-1.0) based on attack results, coverage, and vulnerability severity distribution.
Generate specific attack strategies for a given threat surface, producing concrete probes that can be executed.
Identify and suspend fundamental assumptions via de Bono PO. Systematically negate axioms to reveal hidden solution spaces.
Tactic for systematically extracting axes of variation from literature โ identify how practitioners compare approaches.
Gather independent ranking ballots from multiple judges or perspectives for a given candidate set.
Select appropriate baselines for experimental comparison
Systematic quality assessment using BetterBench 46-criterion framework โ 5 benchmarks, 30 papers, 40 web searches
Identify and negate benchmark assumptions. Deconstruct best practices to reveal hidden constraints and open new spaces.
Systematically scan all known solutions, identify gaps in coverage and unexplored regions of the solution space.
Produce final structured audit report
Select the single best candidate from a set using WSM, TOPSIS, AHP, MAUT, or VIKOR methods.
Assess systematic biases in the evidence body โ publication bias, reporting bias, and selective outcome reporting. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 40 web searches.
Map technical functions to biological systems. Orchestrates problem-biologization โ organism-discovery โ functional-model-biology.
Extract strategy principles from organisms. Identify mechanism-level details of how biological systems achieve their function.