Skip to main content

find-your-level

Use when a learner's technical level is unknown or uncertain, requiring diagnostic calibration before teaching begins.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
yugash007/edu-agent-skills
Last source activity
May 18, 2026 at 16:48
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
7
Forks
2

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
3 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
find-your-level
description
Use when a learner's technical level is unknown or uncertain, requiring diagnostic calibration before teaching begins.
version
1.1.0
authors
["edu-agent-skills contributors"]
tags
["onboarding","level-detection","calibration","prerequisite-awareness"]
status
stable
# Purpose Diagnose a learner's actual knowledge level through targeted questions before teaching. Self-reported level ("I'm intermediate") is unreliable — use observable responses to calibrate depth, pacing, and starting point. # Activation - New learner with no prior profile. Self-reported level inconsistent with responses. New topic with unknown background. Stale profile (2+ weeks) needs reconfirmation. Learner says "I'm not sure where to start." - **Skip if**: profile exists and was recently confirmed, or level is clearly evident from conversation context. - **Routing**: run before `repo-understand`, `teach-concept`, and `lesson-plan` for new learners. If level is obvious (very beginner or clearly expert), a 1–2 question confirmation suffices — skip the full battery. # Inputs - Target domain/topic, any self-reported level, repo/project context if applicable. # Level Definitions - **Beginner**: can't explain core vocabulary or trace a basic example. - **Early Intermediate**: knows vocabulary, implements basics, struggles with composition/tradeoffs. - **Intermediate**: understands mechanism, makes reasonable tradeoffs, hits edge cases when pushed. - **Advanced**: reasons about edge cases, tradeoffs, production implications fluently; can teach it back. # Diagnostic Tiers 3–5 questions in escalating difficulty. Stop when ceiling is reached (two consecutive weak answers). - **Tier 1**: "Explain X in one sentence." → Fluent: advance. Not: Beginner. - **Tier 2**: "Write/describe a minimal example of X." → Correct mechanism: advance. Partial: Early Intermediate. - **Tier 3**: "When would you NOT use X?" → Genuine tradeoffs: advance. Vague: Intermediate. - **Tier 4**: "Describe a production failure mode involving X." → Detailed: Advanced. Partial: Intermediate-Advanced. # Workflow 1. **Align** — Confirm domain and goal. Ask self-reported confidence (1–5). Record as starting hypothesis, not conclusion. 2. **Diagnose** — Start at tier matching self-report minus one. Ask one question at a time. Listen for: correct vocabulary, mechanism, tradeoff awareness, edge case recognition. 3. **Infer** — Level = highest tier answered confidently. If self-report disagrees with diagnostic: use diagnostic, note discrepancy tactfully. 4. **Confirm** — State inferred level with rationale. Ask: "Does this feel right?" Adjust based on learner input. 5. **Recommend** — Beginner: start at prerequisites. Early Intermediate: mechanism + applied examples. Intermediate: tradeoffs + project context. Advanced: edge cases or deep-dive. # Rules - DO: use domain-specific questions, not generic programming trivia. - DO: stop after two consecutive weak answers — don't interrogate. - DO: frame calibration as "here's where we'll start" — never "your self-assessment was wrong." - DO: always confirm inferred level with the learner before starting. - DON'T: accept self-report as sole decision — always run at least 2 diagnostic questions. - DON'T: shame overconfident learners. - DON'T: run all tiers mechanically when ceiling is clearly reached. # Output Responses should contain: domain, self-reported confidence, diagnostic questions + response quality, inferred level with rationale, calibration check prompt, and recommended starting point. Format naturally. # Checklist - [ ] Diagnostic questions are domain-specific. - [ ] Battery stops when ceiling reached. - [ ] Inferred level stated with rationale and learner confirmation sought. - [ ] Starting point matches inferred level.
View on GitHub