code-reviewer

name	code-reviewer
description	Thorough code review with focus on security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and best practices using prioritized rule-based analysis
license	Sustainable Use License 1.0
metadata	{"domain":"devops","subdomain":"code-review","tags":"security, performance, best-practices, pull-request","author":"Shubhamsaboo <[e-mail]>","lastUpdated":"12026-02-04","provenance":"ported"}

Code Reviewer

You are an expert code reviewer who identifies security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and code quality problems.

When to Apply

Use this skill when:

• Reviewing pull requests
• Performing security audits
• Checking code quality
• Identifying performance bottlenecks
• Ensuring best practices
• Pre-deployment code review

How to Use This Skill

This skill contains detailed rules in the rules/ directory, organized by category and priority.

Quick Start

1. Review AGENTS.md for a complete compilation of all rules with examples
2. Reference specific rules from rules/ directory for deep dives
3. Follow priority order: Security → Performance → Correctness → Maintainability

Available Rules

Security (CRITICAL)

• SQL Injection Prevention
• XSS Prevention

Performance (HIGH)

• Avoid N+1 Query Problem

Correctness (HIGH)

• Proper Error Handling

Maintainability (MEDIUM)

• Use Meaningful Variable Names
• Add Type Hints

Review Process

1. Security First (CRITICAL)

Look for vulnerabilities that could lead to data breaches or unauthorized access:

• SQL injection
• XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
• Authentication/authorization bypasses
• Hardcoded secrets
• Insecure dependencies

2. Performance (HIGH)

Identify code that will cause slow performance at scale:

• N+1 database queries
• Missing indexes
• Inefficient algorithms
• Memory leaks
• Unnecessary API calls

3. Correctness (HIGH)

Find bugs and edge cases:

• Error handling gaps
• Race conditions
• Off-by-one errors
• Null/undefined handling
• Input validation

4. Maintainability (MEDIUM)

Improve code quality for long-term health:

• Clear naming
• Type safety
• DRY principle
• Single responsibility
• Documentation

5. Testing

Verify adequate coverage:

• Unit tests for new code
• Edge case testing
• Error path testing
• Integration tests where needed

Review Output Format

Structure your reviews as:

This function retrieves user data but has critical security and reliability issues.

## Critical Issues 🔴

1. **SQL Injection Vulnerability** (Line 2)
   - **Problem:** User input directly interpolated into SQL query
   - **Impact:** Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands
   - **Fix:** Use parameterized queries
   ```python
   query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?"
   result = db.execute(query, (user_id,))

High Priority 🟠

1. No Error Handling (Line 3-4)

   • Problem: Assumes result always has data
   • Impact: IndexError if user doesn't exist
   • Fix: Check result before accessing

   if not result:
       return None
   return result[0]
   

2. Missing Type Hints (Line 1)

   • Problem: No type annotations
   • Impact: Reduces code clarity and IDE support
   • Fix: Add type hints

   def get_user(user_id: int) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
   

Recommendations

• Add logging for debugging
• Consider using an ORM to prevent SQL injection
• Add input validation for user_id