peer-review-response-writer

name	peer-review-response-writer
description	Draft point-by-point responses to reviewer comments using manuscript changes, evidence, and rebuttal structure. Use when responding to peer review.

Peer Review Response Writer

Overview

Draft point-by-point responses to reviewer comments using manuscript changes, evidence, and rebuttal structure.

Core Workflow

1. Gather the source material, existing conventions, templates, and destination format before drafting.
2. Extract the information that matters most for the intended audience and discard low-signal noise.
3. Structure the output so it matches repo, team, or domain expectations instead of starting from a blank generic outline.
4. Draft the artifact, then surface any missing facts or decisions that still need human input.

Deliver

• A ready-to-edit draft in the expected structure and tone.
• The main sections, decisions, or states the artifact should include.
• Open questions or missing facts that would improve the final output.

Guardrails

• Do not invent facts, metrics, approvals, or guarantees that are not supported by the inputs.
• Prefer existing repo or team conventions over generic formatting.
• Keep the output useful and specific rather than padded.
• Do not fabricate citations, sources, or evidence; keep claims tied to the provided material.