| name | pr-review |
| description | Thorough pull request review checklist and process |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | opencode |
| metadata | {"audience":"reviewers","workflow":"github"} |
What I do
- Guide a systematic PR review with a structured checklist
- Check for: code quality, tests, documentation, security, performance
- Provide a review summary in a format ready to paste as a PR comment
When to use me
Use this when reviewing a pull request. I'll help structure the review to be thorough and constructive.
Review Checklist
- Purpose: Does the PR solve the stated problem? Is the scope reasonable?
- Code Quality: Clean, readable, follows project conventions?
- Tests: Are there tests? Do they cover edge cases? Do they pass?
- Documentation: Updated if APIs changed? CHANGELOG entry if needed?
- Security: Any new attack surface? Dependencies audited?
- Performance: Any obvious bottlenecks? Unnecessary work?
- Breaking Changes: Any breaking changes? Are they documented?