| name | quality-checklist |
| description | Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Bash, Grep, Glob, Agent, AskUserQuestion |
| graph | {"domains":["domain:software-engineering"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:agentic-loops","skill-area:orchestration-loop"],"workflows":["workflow:feature-development"],"topics":["topic:developer-experience"],"roles":["role:tech-lead","role:backend-engineer"]} |
- When validating code quality against constitution standards
- When verifying specification requirement coverage
- When running custom project-specific quality checks
Key Principle
Quality validation must be objective, reproducible, and multi-dimensional. Failed items must have actionable remediation recommendations. The checklist supports convergence loops -- re-validate after fixes until quality threshold is met.
Process
- Validate code quality - Check against constitution coding standards
- Verify test coverage - Ensure coverage meets constitution thresholds
- Check spec satisfaction - Verify all requirements are implemented
- Assess performance - Validate against constitution benchmarks
- Verify security - Check compliance with constitution security constraints
- Execute custom checks - Run any project-specific quality checks
- Score overall quality - Weighted average across categories (0-100)
- Produce recommendations - Actionable fixes for failed items
- Remediation loop - Re-validate after fixes (up to 3 iterations)
Tool Use
Invoke via babysitter process: methodologies/spec-kit/spec-kit-implementation (quality checklist phase)
Full pipeline: methodologies/spec-kit/spec-kit-orchestrator
