Generate emoji-prefixed Conventional Commit messages and focused local commits from staged changes or a single clear unstaged change.
Commit a focused local change set with an emoji Conventional Commit message, safely stage a clear unstaged scope when needed, then push the current branch to its remote. Use when the user asks to "commit and push", "commit push", "submit and push", "push my committed change", or wants a local commit finalized on the remote. Do not create pull requests, merge requests, releases, tags, rebases, or deployment changes.
Use this skill when the user wants to decide, set, write, or use a durable coding-agent goal or /goal prompt that keeps Codex, Claude Code, or another agent working until a verifiable done condition is met. It gates autonomy, handles runtime differences, and writes copy-ready goal contracts with outcome, verification, constraints, write boundaries, iteration policy, completion evidence, and pause/ask conditions. Trigger on requests like 'should I set a goal?', 'set up a durable goal', 'give me a /goal prompt', 'turn this vague app idea into a goal', 'keep refactoring until tests pass', 'I am stepping away, have the agent finish this', migrations, refactors, ports, spec implementations, eval loops, backlog cleanup, or multi-checkpoint work. Do not use for single quick edits, running tests once, OKR/scrum goal questions, recurring reminders, or token-budget settings.
Create safe Git feature or hotfix branches with concise names. Use this whenever the user asks to create a branch, start work on a new feature or fix, wants a `feat/...` or `hotfix/...` branch name, asks for a short branch slug from a task description, or wants help before beginning local Git work. Default to recommending the branch name and command first, then create only after user confirmation. Do not push, commit, rebase, or create PRs.
Use when the user's pain is "adding/removing one more X means editing N files" and X is a recurring variant kind: popup, banner, modal, ad slot, payment method, AI model/tool, form field type, connector, sub-site, command, menu item, agent, extension point, or data source. Use when they want to design, refactor, review, name, or explain a pluggable mechanism using registry, interface/trait contract, runtime core, and convention folders; mention pluginize, pluggable, plugin architecture, extension point, registry pattern, or extensibility. Use when explaining the first-principles rationale, DDD/SOLID/OCP mapping, or industry analogies behind that structure. Use for cross-stack mapping to VSCode contributes, Webpack/Vite plugins, Rust/Tauri connectors, Python entry_points, or cargo features. Skip one variant's internals/styles/hooks/copy/bugs, and skip register/registry meaning DI container, user signup, or package registry.
Use BEFORE heavier workflow skills when route choice matters. Route creative work without a design doc/spec to Brainstorm; destructive or hard-to-reverse work to Discuss; unresolved decisions, Plan/Full fan-out, ship checks, unclear bugs, and fresh-eyes fix-then-re-review need this gate. Skip single-line read-only lookups, pure typo/formatting edits, trivial safe one-line fixes, and clearly safe named-skill requests. Outputs Route, Runtime skill, Fallback alias, and Execution path.
Cross-agent code review handoff and review-fix-re-review loop with persistent packet artifacts. Requires a git repo because packet addressing uses git rev-parse --show-toplevel. Use when the user asks for an independent, read-only second pair of eyes on a diff/branch/PR another agent or teammate implemented; asks to verify reviewer feedback before fixing; says a fix is done and wants scoped re-review; asks to continue the latest review packet; or asks for first-principles, DDD, high-cohesion/low-coupling review. Persists each loop under $repo_root/.review-handoff/active/ so agents can resume without copy-paste. Do NOT use for ordinary implementation, generic staged-change review, review-comment copy editing, non-git folders/zips/tarballs/temp dirs, or when the user names a different review skill.
Enforces 'decide then plan' discipline - the pre-planning decision gate. Use when the user asks for a plan or starts a change while key decisions are unresolved: architecture tradeoffs, data flow, public interfaces, unclear requirements, multi-module scope, or roughly 5+ files affected. Also triggers when the user explicitly wants to discuss, compare options, or review architecture before committing. Core job: reduce incorrect-execution cost by confirming decisions before producing executable plans.