| name | citation-verification |
| description | Verify that citations in a document accurately represent their sources. Use this skill when a paper, review article, report, or essay makes claims about external sources and the task is to check whether those cited sources actually support the attributed statements. Focus on verifying that claims, quotes, and numerical assertions are supported by the cited source content. |
| metadata | {"environment":"research-information-synthesis","skill_id":"E5-LS3","short-description":"Check whether citations in a document accurately represent their sources","version":"1.0"} |
Citation Verification
Use this workflow when a document makes claims about cited sources and those claims need to be checked against the original source material. The goal is to confirm whether each cited source actually supports what the document says about it.
Scope: verifying that cited sources support the claims made about them.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- a review article attributes findings to cited studies
- a report uses citations to support factual claims
- a document includes direct quotes that need checking
- the user wants a citation audit rather than a general summary
Verification Workflow
Follow these five steps.
Step 1 — Identify Claims That Cite Sources
Read the document and list each claim that explicitly attributes information to a source.
Examples:
According to Smith (2023), the rate increased by 20%.
Jones (2022) argues that remote work improved retention.
"The intervention reduced costs by 15%" (Lee, 2021).
For each one, record:
- the claim text
- the cited source
- the type of claim
Useful claim types:
- direct quote
- numerical claim
- paraphrased finding
Step 2 — Locate the Cited Source
Find the cited source document before checking the claim.
If the source is not available, mark the claim as unable to verify rather than guessing.
Example:
Claim: the rate increased by 20%
Source: Smith (2023)
Status: source located
Step 3 — Find the Relevant Source Content
Search the source for the part that should support the claim.
Examples:
- for a direct quote, look for the quoted wording
- for a number, look for the same statistic or measurement
- for a paraphrased claim, look for the section discussing that finding
The purpose of this step is to find the source passage that the citing document seems to rely on.
Step 4 — Compare the Claim Against the Source
Once the relevant source content is found, compare it directly against the cited claim.
Check:
- does the source actually make that claim
- do direct quotes match the source wording
- do numerical claims match the source values
- does the citation preserve the source meaning rather than taking it out of context
Examples:
- source says
20% and the claim says 20% -> supported
- source says
15% and the claim says 20% -> discrepancy
- source says
may improve and the claim says proves -> discrepancy
Step 5 — Report the Result
For each cited claim, report whether it is:
- verified
- partially supported
- not supported
- contradicted
- unable to verify
For discrepancies, explain what the source actually says.
Example:
Claim: "According to Smith (2023), the rate increased by 20%."
Result: Verified
Source support: The source reports a 20% increase in the results section.
Claim: "Lee (2021) proved the intervention eliminated errors."
Result: Not supported
Source support: The source says the intervention reduced errors, not that it eliminated them.
Basic Implementation Pattern
def verify_citation(claim, source_excerpt):
if exact_match(claim, source_excerpt):
return "verified"
if partial_match(claim, source_excerpt):
return "partially supported"
if contradiction(claim, source_excerpt):
return "contradicted"
return "not supported"
Practical Rules
Verify the Source Directly
Do not rely on summaries of the source if the original source text is available.
Check Quotes Word for Word
Direct quotations should match the source wording closely.
Check Numbers Carefully
Statistics, percentages, and dates should match the cited source.
Preserve Meaning, Not Just Keywords
A citation can reuse some source words and still misrepresent the source's actual conclusion.
Mark Missing Sources Explicitly
If the source cannot be found, report that the claim could not be verified.
Common Pitfalls
- checking only whether the topic appears in the source instead of whether the claim is truly supported
- verifying paraphrases too loosely
- overlooking small numerical mismatches
- accepting quoted text without comparing it to the source wording
- treating unavailable sources as if they were verified
When NOT to Use
- the task is to summarize the sources rather than verify citations
- the document does not make source-attributed claims
- the user wants a bibliography check instead of source-support verification
Quick Summary
1. Identify each claim that cites a source
2. Locate the cited source document
3. Find the relevant source content
4. Compare the claim against what the source actually says
5. Report verified claims and discrepancies clearly