looper

name	looper
description	Write compact Codex orchestration loops over accepted plans, beads, implementation slices, review/fix passes, and selective subagents. Use when the user asks for a loop, agent loop, workflow loop, Codex loop, retry loop, evaluator loop, multi-agent loop, or orchestration prompt.

Looper

Turn an accepted plan into an executable control loop. Preserve authority, proof, stop conditions, material caveats, and next action; trim repetition and optional explanation first.

System Mapper is deprecated for now. When current-system evidence is insufficient, stop and ask for a narrower evidence-gathering step; use beadwriter when no provable slice exists. Do not invent implementation scope.

Role Policy

Load ../../references/model-routing-policy.yaml when assigning runtime metadata. It is the single local routing policy and evidence pointer, not a universal optimum. Keep semantic role, preferred runtime, and verified runtime separate; preserve the role and record the fallback when the preferred runtime is unavailable. The parent retains acceptance and synthesis.

Select the policy's specialized UI design-and-implementation role when one slice owns both UI design judgment and frontend implementation. Ordinary frontend execution against an already accepted design remains general implementation.

Loop Contract

Carry goal, accepted plan_revision, current slice, proof, ledger, risks, next_action, and status.

1. Re-enter from the checkpoint and choose one dependency-ready, provable slice.
2. At a phase change, checkpoint and then compact the context or start fresh. Carry only the accepted goal and plan revision, decisions, evidence references, open risks, and next action.
3. Assign one write owner. Delegate only independent work that protects parent context or improves wall-clock time.
4. Merge lane returns into evidence, not raw transcript history.
5. Critic: compare the result with the goal, slice contract, tests, regressions, and open risks.
6. If the critic fails, narrow or split the slice, widen evidence, change the lane, or request a planning decision.
7. Checkpoint decisions, evidence references, changed surfaces, risks, and next action.

Stop with:

• complete: all requirements and proof pass.
• waiting: an external check or job is still progressing.
• blocked: required external input is unavailable or the same failure persists across three evidence-changing attempts.

Delegation Contract

Use a manager pattern: the parent retains acceptance and final synthesis. Parallelize read-heavy exploration, tests, triage, or research when scopes are independent; avoid overlapping writers.

Use this stable worker packet for every delegated lane:

outcome:
context_refs:
scope_and_allowed_actions:
invariants:
success_criteria:
validation_steps:
return_schema:
stop_or_escalate_when:
delegation_authority:
material_evidence_since_last_dispatch:

Keep the packet self-contained but lean: reference authoritative artifacts instead of copying them, omit settled decisions, and do not replay the transcript. Set delegation_authority to none unless nested delegation is explicitly necessary and authorized; workers must not spawn or coordinate subagents otherwise. On a redispatch, material_evidence_since_last_dispatch must identify the new failing output, changed diff, clarified decision, or other evidence that changes the packet. For a planning lane, put the unresolved decision and required planning artifact in outcome, and the relevant alternatives, consequences, and failed evidence in context_refs.

Require the worker to run the packet's validation steps. If validation fails, confidence is low, or wider scope appears, narrow or revise the packet and return it to the implementor role. The reviewer role checks the pre-slice fixed point and originating childbead or accepted spec after each implementation or fix pass.

Skills assist a lane; they do not define whether the lane can run. Prefer an installed implementation skill for code work and an installed code-review skill for review, resolving the capability by purpose rather than requiring one exact package-qualified name. Check the available skill catalog once. If a useful skill cannot be resolved or loaded, continue directly from the worker packet or review contract and report the fallback; do not block merely because an alias, namespace, plugin version, or optional skill is missing.

Give the reviewer the originating acceptance criteria, repository instructions, fixed-point diff, and relevant test output. Ask for actionable correctness, regression, security, or missing-test findings first, ordered by severity with file/line evidence and a minimal fix direction. The reviewer should run cheap targeted checks to resolve uncertainty, say no findings when appropriate, and never block solely because a preferred review skill is unavailable. Default to one implementation, one review, one implementor repair, and one fresh confirmation review; continue only for genuinely new evidence.

Lane returns should contain only changed_or_learned, validation, confidence, scope_change_or_blocker, and next_action. Use a machine schema only when software parses the return.

Coordination Contract

Workers must report completion, failure, or escalation proactively through their lane return. The parent must not ask for status or poll worker state without new evidence that requires intervention.

Keep at most one event-driven wait outstanding. Use the longest timeout allowed by the governing runtime and return early only for a worker event, user input, or an external-state change. If the wait expires with no new event or evidence, wait again directly: do not call list_agents, send a worker message, synthesize a status update, or perform coordination-only reasoning.

Redispatch or follow up only when material new evidence changes the worker packet; record that evidence in material_evidence_since_last_dispatch. A timeout, elapsed time, unchanged status, or repeated worker claim is not material evidence. Do not create a nested orchestrator or authorize worker delegation unless the packet's delegation_authority explicitly names the bounded purpose and limits.

Quiet waiting does not lower the reasoning standard for substantive work. The parent may use Sol Medium for difficult diagnosis, consequential errors, replanning, final synthesis, or UI design judgment when new evidence requires it; unchanged waits must not trigger a fresh reasoning pass.

Output

Return the executable loop, coordination contract, cross-bead verification contract, uncovered residual risks, status rules, and commit or PR recommendation. Every generated loop that delegates work must include the event-driven wait, unchanged-timeout, proactive completion, nested-delegation, and evidence-gated redispatch rules above. Reference the accepted plan, bead IDs, and checkpoint artifacts; do not copy their scope, invariants, proof, or risk checklists into the loop. Emit a worker packet only when dispatching a worker. Name only the roles actually used; do not repeat the routing policy.

Aim for one screen and roughly 2,600 characters or less. Exceed that soft target only when authority, proof, adaptation, stop conditions, or a material caveat would otherwise be lost.