| name | pr-creation |
| description | Creates high-quality pull requests with mandatory self-critique before submission. Activate this skill whenever you are asked to create, open, submit, or push a pull request. Also activate when the user says "make a PR", "open a PR", "submit this for review", "push and create a PR", "I'm done, create the PR", or any variation of requesting a pull request. Always activate before running `gh pr create`.
|
Pull Request Creation Skill
IMPORTANT: Always follow this skill before creating any PR. Do not skip steps, especially the self-critique.
When to Use
Activate this skill when the user says any of the following (or similar):
- “Create a PR” / “Create a pull request”
- “Open a PR” / “Open a pull request”
- “Make a PR for this”
- “Submit this for review”
- “Push and create a PR”
- “I’m done, create the PR”
- “Can you PR this?”
- “Send this up for review”
Also activate when:
- You have completed a task and the user asks you to submit it
- CLAUDE.md or task instructions say to create a PR when done
Do NOT use this skill for:
- Reviewing an existing PR (use
gh pr view or gh pr diff instead)
- Merging a PR (
gh pr merge)
- Updating a PR description only (just run
gh pr edit)
Prerequisites
- GitHub CLI (
gh) must be authenticated
- All changes must be committed to a feature branch (not
$CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF/master)
Updating an Existing PR
Before updating an existing PR (pushing new commits, editing the description, etc.), you MUST check its current status:
- Run
gh pr view <pr-number> --json state to check the PR state
- Based on the result:
- Open: Proceed with the update normally
- Merged: Do NOT update it. Create a new PR instead with the additional changes
- Closed (not merged): Ask the user what they’d like to do, if not already clarified
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Context
- The base branch is in the env variable
$CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF
- Run
git diff <base-branch>...HEAD to see all changes
- Run
git log <base-branch>..HEAD --oneline to see all commits
- Review the changed files to understand the scope
- Check for PR description guidance—look for
CONTRIBUTING.md, .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, or similar files in the repo. If found, read them and adapt the PR description to follow the repository’s conventions (see pr-templates.md for details)
Step 2: Self-Critique
Before creating the PR, you MUST read the critique prompt at .claude/skills/pr-creation/critique-prompt.md and launch a critique sub-agent using the Task tool:
subagent_type: “general-purpose”
description: “Critique code changes”
prompt: Include the full diff output and the critique prompt from that file
Do NOT skip reading the resource file—it contains the detailed checklist the sub-agent needs.
Step 3: Address Critique
- For each issue raised, determine if it’s valid
- Make necessary fixes and commit them
- If you fixed more than 3 issues or made structural changes, re-run the critique (max 2 re-runs total—if issues persist after 2 rounds of critique, proceed to validation rather than looping indefinitely)
Step 4: Stress-Test Infrastructure Changes
If the diff includes changes to infrastructure components (sandbox config, container orchestration, firewall rules, CI workflows, entrypoint hardening, domain allowlist), run /stress-test for those components before proceeding — unless the diff already includes comprehensive tests for the changed infrastructure. The stress-test skill generates both static config validation and live runtime checks, and runs its own iterative critique-fix loop on the test code.
Step 5: Run Validation
Run the project’s test/lint/typecheck commands (see pr-templates.md for common commands per language). Fix any failures before proceeding.
Step 6: Push and Create the Pull Request
You MUST read pr-templates.md for the PR template and formatting guidelines before this step.
- Push the branch:
git push -u origin HEAD
- Check if a PR already exists for the current branch:
EXISTING_PR=$(gh pr list --head "$(git branch --show-current)" --json number --jq '.[0].number' 2>/dev/null)
If a PR already exists, update it with gh pr edit instead of creating a new one.
- Create the PR using
gh pr create with the template from the resource file. Make sure that you use the target branch
Step 7: Update PR Title and Description (after any post-creation changes)
If you made any commits after creating the PR (from critique, validation, or CI failures), always update the PR title and description to reflect the final state of all changes:
- Re-read the diff (
git diff $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF...HEAD) and commit log (git log $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF..HEAD --oneline) to see the full scope
- Rewrite the title and body to accurately describe the current totality of changes, not just the original scope:
gh pr edit <pr-number> --title "<type>: <updated description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
<updated body using template from pr-templates.md>
EOF
)"
Skip this step if no commits were made after Step 6.
Step 8: Wait for CI Checks (MANDATORY)
- Run
gh pr checks <pr-number> --watch to monitor
- If any checks fail, investigate and fix the issues
- Push fixes, update the PR description (Step 7), and wait again
- Only proceed once all checks are green
Step 9: Report Result
Provide the PR URL and confirm all CI checks have passed.
Examples
Example 1: Simple Bug Fix
User says: “I’m done fixing the login bug, create a PR”
Claude’s actions:
- Runs
git diff $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF...HEAD—sees changes in src/auth/login.ts and tests/auth/login.test.ts
- Runs
git log $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF..HEAD --oneline—sees 2 commits
- Launches critique sub-agent with the diff
- Critique returns: “Looks good, minor suggestion to add null check on line 42”
- Fixes the null check, commits:
fix: add null check for empty session token
- Runs
pnpm check && pnpm test && pnpm lint—all pass
- Pushes and creates PR:
gh pr create --title "fix: handle null session token in login flow" --body "..."
- Updates PR description to reflect the null-check fix added during critique
- Watches CI with
gh pr checks 47 --watch—all green
- Reports: “PR #47 created and all CI checks pass: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/47"
Example 2: Multi-Commit Feature
User says: “Submit this for review”
Claude’s actions:
- Runs
git diff $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF...HEAD—sees changes across 8 files including new components, tests, and API routes
- Runs
git log $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF..HEAD --oneline—sees 5 commits
- Launches critique sub-agent with the full diff
- Critique returns 4 issues: unused import, missing error boundary, test not covering edge case, over-engineered helper
- Fixes all 4 issues across 2 additional commits
- Re-runs critique (>3 fixes)—clean this time
- Runs validation—all pass
- Pushes and creates PR with detailed body summarizing the feature
- Updates PR title and description to reflect all changes including critique fixes
- Watches CI—one check fails (lint warning on new file)
- Fixes lint issue, pushes, updates PR description again—all green
- Reports success with PR URL
Example 3: When Input Is Unclear
User says: “Push this up”
Claude asks: “I see you have changes on branch feat/user-dashboard. Would you like me to create a pull request against $CLAUDE_CODE_BASE_REF, or just push the branch without creating a PR?”
Error Handling
- Critique finds issues: Fix them before proceeding—do not skip
- Tests fail: Fix the tests, don’t skip them
gh not authenticated: Tell user to run gh auth login or set GH_TOKEN
- Push fails: Check branch permissions and remote configuration
- PR already exists (HTTP 422): Check for existing PRs first with
gh pr list --head "$(git branch --show-current)", then use gh pr edit to update
- No changes to PR: Confirm with the user that work is committed