Jeden Skill in Manus ausführen
mit einem Klick

Jeden Skill in Manus mit einem Klick ausführen

professional-orchestrator

Sterne6

Forks2

Aktualisiert19. April 2026 um 07:00

Entry point for professional skills — architecture, communication, process design, ethics, and leadership. Routes to the right skill based on what the user needs. Use this when the user's goal involves a professional discipline but they haven't named a specific skill.

Installation

Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.

In Manus ausführen

Quelle

AndurilCode

AndurilCode/craftwork

GitHub-Repository öffnen Creator-Repositorys ansehen

Download

In Manus ausführen

Verwandte BerufeSOC

Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation

UnternehmensberaterWirtschafts- und Finanzberufe·SOC 13-1111

ProjektmanagementspezialistenSOC 13-1082

SKILL.md

readonly

Mehr aus diesem Repository

gleiches Repository

automate

AndurilCode/craftwork

Build automation scripts and pipelines that use coding-agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI) in headless/non-interactive mode as the AI engine, or delegate work to cloud agents (`gh agent-task`) that open pull requests asynchronously. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write a shell script, CI job, cron task, batch processor, webhook handler, or any automation that shells out to `claude`, `codex`, `gemini`, `copilot`, or `gh agent-task` — single-turn prompts, multi-turn agentic loops, parallel fan-out across files/folders, structured JSON outputs consumed by downstream tools, or cloud-delegated tasks that produce PRs. Trigger on phrases like "script that uses Claude", "automate with Claude Code", "headless Claude", "batch process files with an LLM", "pipeline with codex exec", "gemini -p", "copilot --autopilot", "gh agent-task create", "GitHub Action that calls Claude", "cron job to review PRs", "agent loop in bash", "dispatch an agent task to open a PR", "fleet-wide agent-tas

2026-04-196

causal-inference

AndurilCode/craftwork

Apply causal inference whenever the user is interpreting metrics, debugging system behavior, reading A/B test results, or trying to understand whether an observed change was caused by an action or by something else. Triggers on phrases like "X caused Y", "since we deployed this, metrics changed", "the A/B test showed a lift", "why did this metric move?", "is this correlation or causation?", "we changed X and Y improved", "how do we know this worked?", "the data shows…", or any situation where conclusions are being drawn from observational data. Also trigger before any decision based on metric interpretation — confusing correlation with causation leads to interventions that don't work and misattribution of credit. Never assume causation without applying this skill.

2026-04-196

ethical-reasoning

AndurilCode/craftwork

Apply ethical reasoning whenever the user faces a decision, design, or action with moral implications — especially when someone could be harmed, rights could be violated, or values are in tension. Triggers on phrases like "is this the right thing to do?", "what are the ethical implications?", "who could this harm?", "should we build this?", "is this fair?", "what are our obligations?", "value trade-off", "responsible AI". Use proactively when reviewing any high-stakes decision, product design affecting vulnerable populations, or action where the beneficiaries and those bearing costs are different groups.

2026-04-196

execution-planning

AndurilCode/craftwork

Apply execution-planning whenever the user has made a decision and needs to turn it into action — decomposing work, sequencing tasks, estimating timelines, and assigning ownership. Triggers on phrases like "how do we execute this?", "break this into tasks", "what's the project plan?", "create a roadmap", "what are the dependencies?", "who does what by when?", "how long will this take to build?". Use proactively after decision-synthesis or architecture-evaluation produces a committed decision that requires coordinated implementation.

2026-04-196

experimental-design

AndurilCode/craftwork

Apply experimental-design whenever the user needs to test a hypothesis, validate an assumption, or determine whether something actually works. Triggers on phrases like "how do we test this?", "design an experiment", "what would prove this?", "set up an A/B test", "how do we validate this hypothesis?", "what's the right control?", "is this result significant?", "what sample size do we need?". Use proactively when decisions rest on untested assumptions — designing the test before collecting data prevents post-hoc rationalization.

2026-04-196

fairness-auditing

AndurilCode/craftwork

Apply fairness auditing whenever the user describes a system, algorithm, policy, or process that allocates outcomes across groups and wants to know whether it is equitable. Triggers on phrases like "is this fair?", "disparate impact", "bias in the system", "does this discriminate?", "algorithmic fairness", "who's disadvantaged by this?", "equitable outcomes". Use proactively when reviewing any allocation mechanism, scoring system, or automated decision pipeline that affects people differently based on group membership.

2026-04-196

name	professional-orchestrator
description	Entry point for professional skills — architecture, communication, process design, ethics, and leadership. Routes to the right skill based on what the user needs. Use this when the user's goal involves a professional discipline but they haven't named a specific skill.

Professional Orchestrator

Routes — does not reason. Match user intent to an entry point, then execute that skill's SKILL.md.

Step 1 — Match Intent

If ambiguous, ask one clarifying question.

User wants to...	Start with	Then
Architecture & Engineering
Evaluate or choose between architectures	`architecture-evaluation`	→ `execution-planning`
Debug a software failure systematically	`debugging-methodology`	→ `casual-inference` if causal
Design or run an experiment	`experimental-design`	→ `casual-inference` after results
Review code or a PR	`code-review-amplifier`	done
Find incremental improvements, tech debt, code hygiene	`kaizen`	→ `execution-planning` or `process-design`
Understand why code is the way it is, audit undocumented fixes	`kintsugi`	→ `knowledge-architect` or `technical-writing`
Planning & Execution
Break a decision into an action plan	`execution-planning`	done
Design or improve a workflow/process	`process-design`	→ `execution-planning`
Build a financial model or business case	`financial-modeling`	→ `argument-craft`
Writing & Communication
Write an RFC, design doc, ADR, runbook, postmortem, one-pager, announcement	`technical-writing`	→ `narrative-construction` if storytelling
Summarize a document, article, transcript, meeting notes	`summarizer`	→ `technical-writing` or `argument-craft` if needed
Structure a recommendation or argument	`argument-craft`	→ `technical-writing` to write up
Tell a compelling story from analysis	`narrative-construction`	→ `presentation-craft` if presenting
Create, structure, or improve a presentation/talk/pitch	`presentation-craft`	done
Prepare for a negotiation	`negotiation-strategy`	→ `difficult-conversations` if high stakes
Navigate a difficult conversation	`difficult-conversations`	done
Design a meeting or workshop	`facilitation-design`	done
People & Organizations
Map stakeholder influence and blockers	`stakeholder-power-mapping`	→ `negotiation-strategy` or `difficult-conversations`
Ramp up on a new domain	`learning-strategy`	→ `topic-explainer` for specific concepts
Understand or learn a concept, technology, idea	`topic-explainer`	→ `technical-writing` to document
Ethics & Fairness
Surface moral implications of a decision	`ethical-reasoning`	→ `fairness-auditing` if systemic
Audit a system for equitable outcomes	`fairness-auditing`	→ `argument-craft` to present
Determine causation vs correlation	`casual-inference`	done
Knowledge Management
Capture a decision, learning, or tribal knowledge	`knowledge-architect`	→ `technical-writing` if formal doc needed
Set up or improve a team's knowledge system	`knowledge-architect`	done (produces architecture)
Someone is leaving / joining	`knowledge-architect`	detect mode for departures, audit for joiners
Meta
Scan all skills to find the right one(s)	`skill-router`	→ matched skill(s)

Step 2 — Execute

Read skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md
Apply that skill's full methodology
Check the "Then" column for follow-ups

Step 3 — Propose Next Steps

Do NOT auto-execute. Propose:

Based on [what the skill produced], a natural next step would be:
→ [skill-name]: [1-sentence reason]

Want me to continue, or is this what you needed?

Multiple follow-ups → list as options. User chooses.

Canonical Chains

Architecture decision: architecture-evaluation → argument-craft → execution-planning Making and implementing a system design choice.

Building a business case: financial-modeling → argument-craft → execution-planning Numbers → narrative → action.

Navigating organizational resistance: stakeholder-power-mapping → negotiation-strategy → difficult-conversations People blocking progress; understand why and how to move them.

Process improvement: process-design → execution-planning Workflow is slow or broken.

Documenting a technical decision: architecture-evaluation → technical-writing (ADR or RFC) Architecture decision needs write-up.

Ethics review: ethical-reasoning → fairness-auditing → argument-craft Moral and equity analysis, then communication of findings.

Skill Registry

Skill	Purpose
`architecture-evaluation`	Evaluate system design decisions, produce ADRs
`code-review-amplifier`	Structured pre-scanning for human code reviewers
`debugging-methodology`	Systematic debugging: reproduce, observe, hypothesize, isolate
`execution-planning`	Decompose decisions into executable plans
`experimental-design`	Design rigorous experiments to validate assumptions
`process-design`	Design workflows using Lean and value stream analysis
`financial-modeling`	Unit economics, cost-benefit, NPV/IRR, scenario modeling
`argument-craft`	Structure recommendations into persuasive arguments
`narrative-construction`	Turn analysis into compelling stories
`negotiation-strategy`	Prepare for negotiations with BATNA, ZOPA, concession planning
`difficult-conversations`	Navigate conflict, feedback, emotionally charged discussions
`facilitation-design`	Design meetings and workshops that produce decisions
`stakeholder-power-mapping`	Map influence networks and design engagement strategies
`ethical-reasoning`	Surface moral implications using multiple ethical frameworks
`fairness-auditing`	Audit systems for equitable outcomes across groups
`learning-strategy`	Build structured plans for closing knowledge gaps
`casual-inference`	Distinguish causation from correlation
`technical-writing`	Write RFCs, design docs, ADRs, runbooks, postmortems, announcements
`topic-explainer`	Explain concepts, technologies, ideas using the best style
`summarizer`	Summarize documents, articles, transcripts, multi-source content
`presentation-craft`	Presentation scripts: narrative arc, slide visuals, speaker notes
`kaizen`	Continuous improvement audit: waste, unevenness, overburden
`kintsugi`	Repair visibility audit: undocumented fixes, context gold
`skill-router`	Exhaustive skill scan and composition planning
`knowledge-architect`	Capture decisions, context, learnings; design team knowledge systems