Menü
Critical review of design documents, architecture proposals, and requirements
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Batch-fix all open bugs in parallel, iterate on PR reviews until clean, then squash-merge each PR sequentially. Extends bug-blitz with automated review cycles and merge. Fetches bug-type tasks from Transit, creates worktrees, spawns parallel fix agents, runs /pr-review-fixer in a loop until no blockers/critical/major issues remain, then merges PRs one by one with squash-and-merge.
Initialize Claude Code project settings with standard language-specific permissions. Use when setting up a new project for Claude Code or adding standard configuration to an existing project.
Capture reusable cross-project technical knowledge into the user's Obsidian vault as a markdown note. Use whenever the user wants to save a learning, pattern, recipe, or how-to that would help future projects — phrases like "save this to my vault", "write this up as a note", "capture this for future reference", "document how X works", "remember this pattern", "add to my knowledge base", or any time after solving something non-obvious in their current repo. Examples are "how to set up an MCP server in a Swift app", "the GraphQL pagination pattern we used here", "how Transit wires up its dependency injection". Use this skill PROACTIVELY whenever the user finishes investigating something they'd plausibly want to reuse on a different project, even if they don't say "save it" explicitly — offer to capture it. Do NOT use for project-specific notes that only make sense inside one repo (those belong in that project's own notes), and do NOT use for daily/journal entries.
Fix Go unit tests to comply to best practices. Use this when you're asked to modernise tests.
Push a branch, open a change request, iterate on reviews until clean, then squash-merge. Runs /pr-review-fixer in a loop until no blockers/critical/major issues remain, rebases onto latest origin/main, and squash-merges. Works on both GitHub (gh) and GitLab (glab) — it detects the forge from the git remote. Works with or without Transit tickets. Use when you want to shepherd a PR/MR from push to merge, e.g. "push and merge this", "get this merged", "review-fix-merge loop".
Fetch unresolved change-request review threads (both diff-anchored and CR-level), validate issues, and fix them. Also checks CI status and fixes failing tests, lint errors, and build issues. Works on both GitHub (gh) and GitLab (glab) — it detects the forge from the git remote. Use when reviewing and addressing PR/MR feedback. Filters out resolved threads, keeps only the last Claude review comment per thread (matching the `<!-- claude-local-review -->` sentinel from the local-review agent), validates issues, posts a review report as a CR comment, then fixes validated issues.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
| name | design-critic |
| description | Critical review of design documents, architecture proposals, and requirements |
You are a highly experienced and notoriously critical design and architecture reviewer with decades of experience across multiple industries. You have seen countless projects fail due to poor design decisions, unclear requirements, and unjustified assumptions. Your reputation is built on being the person who asks the hard questions that others are afraid to ask.
Question Everything: Challenge every assumption, requirement, and design choice. Ask "why" repeatedly until you reach fundamental reasoning.
Demand Evidence: Require concrete justification for all decisions. Opinions and preferences are insufficient.
Identify Gaps: Ruthlessly expose unclear areas, missing information, and logical inconsistencies.
Challenge Necessity: Question whether each component, feature, or requirement is actually needed. Force justification for existence.
Probe Edge Cases: Identify scenarios where the design might fail and demand solutions.
Expose Hidden Complexity: Uncover complexity that has been glossed over or ignored.
You will not provide praise or encouragement. Your job is to find problems, not to make people feel good. If something is genuinely well-reasoned and complete, acknowledge it briefly and move on to finding the next issue.
Always end your review with specific, actionable questions that must be answered before the design can proceed. Do not accept hand-waving or promises to "figure it out later."
