| name | delegation-patterns |
| description | Subagent/team delegation workflow. |
| origin | pi-crew |
| triggers | ["delegate this","split this task","parallelize","dispatch workers","assign to team"] |
delegation-patterns
Use this skill when deciding how to delegate work.
Source patterns distilled
- pi-subagents: foreground/background/parallel/chain execution, fork/fresh context, worktree isolation, result watcher
- pi-crew:
src/extension/team-tool/run.ts, src/runtime/team-runner.ts, src/runtime/task-graph-scheduler.ts, builtin teams/*.team.md, workflows/*.workflow.md
- Existing pi-crew skill:
task-packet
Rules
- Delegate when tasks span multiple files/subsystems, need planning/review/verification, or can be independently researched.
- Do not parallelize edits to the same file, symbol, migration path, manifest/lockfile, or generated schema unless explicitly sequenced.
- Use read-only explorer/reviewer roles for source audit; implementation workers should receive narrow task packets.
- For async/background work, provide concrete objective, scope, constraints, outputs, and verification. Do not spin in wait loops; retrieve results when notified or when needed.
- For chain-style work, pass dependency outputs forward explicitly and require downstream workers to read upstream artifacts first.
- Use worktree isolation for risky parallel code-changing tasks when repository cleanliness and merge plan allow it.
- Require workers to report blockers and smallest recoverable next action rather than making broad assumptions.
Escalation Matrix (from SOC operations)
Define severity tiers and escalation paths for team tasks:
escalation:
tiers:
- level: P1
name: Critical
sla_response: 15m
sla_resolution: 1h
owner: lead
notify: [manager, stakeholders]
criteria: [data_loss, security_breach, complete_outage, customer_facing]
- level: P2
name: High
sla_response: 1h
sla_resolution: 4h
owner: senior_dev
notify: [lead]
criteria: [partial_outage, significant_bug, regression]
- level: P3
name: Medium
sla_response: 4h
sla_resolution: 24h
owner: mid_dev
notify: [team]
criteria: [minor_bug, feature_break, ux_issue]
- level: P4
name: Low
sla_response: 24h
sla_resolution: 1w
owner: junior_dev
notify: []
criteria: [enhancement, low_priority, tech_debt]
escalation_path: [P4 → P3 → P2 → P1]
override_conditions: [security, data_loss, customer_facing]
Escalation Rules
- Escalate up when: task exceeds SLA, blocker unresolved, scope change required
- Override for: security incidents (skip P4/P3), data loss (immediate P1)
- Notify at each tier: owner first, then notify list
- Document every escalation with reason and timestamp
Task packet checklist
- objective
- scope/paths
- allowed edits vs read-only areas
- constraints and project rules
- dependencies/input artifacts
- expected output artifacts
- acceptance criteria
- verification commands
- escalation conditions
- severity/tier (P1-P4)
- response SLA
Enforcement — Delegation Patterns Gate
Before delegating work to workers, verify:
If ANY answer is NO → Stop. Complete the task packet before dispatching.
Anti-patterns
- Sending broad "fix everything" prompts to multiple editors in one workspace.
- Waiting for async workers by sleeping/polling when result notifications exist.
- Letting review workers modify files.
- Claiming completion without durable artifacts or verification evidence.
Verification
For orchestration changes:
cd pi-crew
npx tsc --noEmit
node --experimental-strip-types --test test/unit/team-recommendation.test.ts test/unit/task-output-context-security.test.ts test/integration/phase3-runtime.test.ts
npm test