Menü
Workshop this idea with me
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
Maintain a support docs pack — dedup, length budgets, and no splintering — and land changes as a reviewed pull request. Use when a support thread, or a hand-off from Support assist, surfaces a new resolution, a correction to an existing one, or a deployment quirk worth recording. Not for ordinary code changes.
Run a support investigation as a suggest-and-interpret loop, never executing anything yourself — orient to the product's support pack and follow the signal with judgment. Use when someone asks for help triaging, investigating, or resolving an operational or support issue on a deployment. Not for feature-development cards (see investigate-and-fix and implement-this).
Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
Draft or refine the project's PRD from the description and conversation
| name | workshop |
| description | Workshop this idea with me |
| label | Workshop this |
| pill-order | {"not-started":4,"specifying":10} |
| workhorse-version | 0.1.0 |
If you don't already have this card's context (title, identifier, description) — for instance when running outside Workhorse — establish it first by following .agents/docs/card-context.md.
The user wants to explore and refine an idea. Help them think through approaches, trade-offs, and possibilities. Generate mockups when a visual would help illustrate a concept. This is exploratory — follow the user's curiosity rather than driving toward a specific output.
Source the visual language before writing any HTML — do not skip steps:
a. Read the actual implementation of the section being mocked in the target repo. The shipped code is the baseline for how the screen really looks today — components, layout, spacing, copy. Start here so your output is grounded in what exists, not imagined from scratch
b. Read implementations of similar components elsewhere in the target repo to pick up patterns for any new elements not yet present in the section
c. Cross-check against .workhorse/design/ — the design system, component docs, and philosophy notes. The design library may have been updated more recently than the code, so if it disagrees with the implementation, the design library wins
d. Do not reference mockups from other cards under .workhorse/design/mockups/ unless the user explicitly asks — they are point-in-time artefacts, not canonical components
Preserve unchanged aspects. Author fresh HTML and CSS only for the feature or tweak you are exploring. For every other region of the screen, be visually faithful to the current implementation — same layout, components, copy, spacing, styling. Do not re-imagine, re-style, or re-layout regions the card is not changing, and do not let stale styling from mockups on other cards leak in. See "Preserving unchanged aspects" in your system prompt.
