Menü
Full autonomous engineering workflow
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
Researches and synthesizes external best practices, documentation, and examples for any technology or framework. Use when you need industry standards, community conventions, or implementation guidance.
Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before writing a right-sized requirements document and planning implementation. Use for feature ideas, problem framing, when the user says 'let's brainstorm', or when they want to think through options before deciding what to build. Also use when a user describes a vague or ambitious feature request, asks 'what should we build', 'help me think through X', presents a problem with multiple valid solutions, or seems unsure about scope or direction — even if they don't explicitly ask to brainstorm.
Refresh stale or drifting learnings and pattern docs in docs/solutions/ by reviewing, updating, consolidating, replacing, or deleting them against the current codebase. Use after refactors, migrations, dependency upgrades, or when a retrieved learning feels outdated or wrong. Also use when reviewing docs/solutions/ for accuracy, when a recently solved problem contradicts an existing learning, when pattern docs no longer reflect current code, or when multiple docs seem to cover the same topic and might benefit from consolidation.
Document a recently solved problem to compound your team's knowledge
Systematically find root causes and fix bugs. Use when debugging errors, investigating test failures, reproducing bugs from issue trackers (GitHub, Linear, Jira), or when stuck on a problem after failed fix attempts. Also use when the user says 'debug this', 'why is this failing', 'fix this bug', 'trace this error', or pastes stack traces, error messages, or issue references.
Capture a visual demo reel (GIF, terminal recording, screenshots) for PR descriptions. Use when shipping UI changes, CLI features, or any work with observable behavior that benefits from visual proof. Also use when asked to add a demo, record a GIF, screenshot a feature, show what changed visually, create a demo reel, capture evidence, add proof to a PR, or create a before/after comparison.
| name | lfg |
| description | Full autonomous engineering workflow |
| argument-hint | [feature description] |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
CRITICAL: You MUST execute every step below IN ORDER. Do NOT skip any required step. Do NOT jump ahead to coding or implementation. The plan phase (step 2) MUST be completed and verified BEFORE any work begins. Violating this order produces bad output.
Optional: If the ralph-loop skill is available, run /ralph-loop-ralph-loop "finish all slash commands" --completion-promise "DONE". If not available or it fails, skip and continue to step 2 immediately.
/ce-plan $ARGUMENTS
GATE: STOP. If ce:plan reported the task is non-software and cannot be processed in pipeline mode, stop the pipeline and inform the user that LFG requires software tasks. Otherwise, verify that the ce:plan workflow produced a plan file in docs/plans/. If no plan file was created, run /ce-plan $ARGUMENTS again. Do NOT proceed to step 3 until a written plan exists. Record the plan file path — it will be passed to ce:review in step 4.
/ce-work
GATE: STOP. Verify that implementation work was performed - files were created or modified beyond the plan. Do NOT proceed to step 4 if no code changes were made.
/ce-review mode:autofix plan:<plan-path-from-step-2>
Pass the plan file path from step 2 so ce:review can verify requirements completeness.
/compound-engineering-todo-resolve
/compound-engineering-test-browser
Output <promise>DONE</promise> when complete
Start with step 2 now (or step 1 if ralph-loop is available). Remember: plan FIRST, then work. Never skip the plan.
