| name | decision-maker |
| description | Structured decision-making framework — weigh options, evaluate trade-offs, deliver clear recommendations |
| author | AuthorAgent |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| triggers | ["decide","decision","pros and cons","compare options","should I","which option","trade-offs","weigh options"] |
| permissions | ["memory_read","memory_write"] |
Decision Maker
Help the user make structured decisions by evaluating options systematically.
Workflow
Step 1: Frame the Decision
- Identify the decision clearly: "Which X should I choose?"
- List all available options (2-5 options ideal)
- Identify the criteria that matter most to the user
Step 2: Build a Decision Matrix
Evaluate each option against these dimensions:
- Impact: How much does this move the needle? (1-5)
- Effort: How much work/cost is involved? (1-5, lower = easier)
- Risk: What could go wrong? (1-5, lower = safer)
- Reversibility: Can this be undone? (1-5, higher = more reversible)
- Alignment: Does this match the user's goals/values? (1-5)
Step 3: Recommend
- State your recommendation clearly
- Explain your reasoning in 2-3 sentences
- Note what would change your recommendation
- Suggest a concrete next step
Output Format
Present as a clean comparison table followed by a direct recommendation with reasoning.
Author-Specific Applications
- Choosing between publishing paths (trad vs. indie vs. hybrid)
- Selecting POV or tense for a project
- Deciding story structure (linear vs. non-linear, single vs. multiple POV)
- Choosing between revision strategies
- Market positioning decisions (genre, comp titles, audience)
