| name | drive-plan |
| description | Drive a multi-phase plan to completion autonomously — ideally a Comment.io "Plan" comm (falling back to a local Markdown plan file) as the living source of truth. Implements each phase, validates locally and on staging where possible, keeps the plan in sync, runs `$review-loop` at phase boundaries, and steers to a human when a decision shouldn't be made alone. Composes worklog/steer/review-loop and is the execution engine `comment-feature` delegates to. Invoke as `$drive-plan` / `/drive-plan`, or when asked to execute a phased plan autonomously. Works identically under Codex and Claude Code. |
drive-plan — the phased-plan execution engine
Drive one multi-phase plan to completion, moving through every phase autonomously until the plan is done or a stop condition is reached. This is a generic, reusable engine: use it standalone on any phased plan, and note that comment-feature / comment-bug delegate their execution step to it.
Source of truth — prefer a Plan comm
The plan is the living source of truth for scope, current state, validation evidence, and remaining work. Prefer a Comment.io Plan comm so humans can watch and steer; fall back to a local Markdown plan file only when no Comment.io credentials are available or the user asked for a local file.
- Given a Plan comm URL/slug → drive that comm.
- Given a Markdown plan file → drive that file.
- Given a plan but no comm, and credentials exist → open one via
worklog (Plan shape) and drive it.
- Given a Project Root URL by
comment-feature / comment-bug → preserve it. Any Plan comm you create is a child with Project Root: URL near the top and a link from the root. Standalone drive-plan does not create a Project Root just for itself.
Identity. In comm mode, every Plan comm that drive-plan creates goes through worklog, so keep the working route's identity or a supplied Plan token for all plan edits, evidence comments, and steering comments. Invoke comment-identity only if that route is uncredentialed direct REST, then reuse that Ephemeral handle for later direct-REST writes. Do not switch to an ambient registered profile, a Botlets bot profile, or a different identity mid-task. Markdown-file mode makes no Comment.io writes.
Where things go depends on the mode:
- Comm mode (preferred): phase tasks, acceptance criteria, status, decisions, and scope changes are document body, kept in sync as you go (check
- [x] boxes, update status). Every $review-loop round, steering exchange, validation-evidence note, and escalation is a comment — a list or short lines, never one paragraph. If a Project Root exists, keep bulky evidence in the Plan comm/comment stream and add only short summaries or links to the root.
- Markdown-file mode (no comm): everything goes in the file — update the phase/status/decisions in place, and record validation evidence +
$review-loop round summaries in a "Log" section of the file. Do not create a Comment.io doc you weren't given; steering in this mode is direct to the user.
Operating rules
- Keep all phase status, scope changes, decisions, assumptions, validation results, and follow-ups in the plan body — revise it whenever reality changes (new constraints, reordered work, added/removed tasks, shifted scope).
- Make reasonable implementation decisions without asking; record meaningful assumptions and keep moving.
- Don't declare a phase done just because its listed tasks are checked — hunt for unfinished work, test gaps, edge cases, stale plan text, and follow-up fixes first.
- Work through all phases; stop only on a stop condition below.
Phase loop
For each phase:
- Normalize the phase into concrete tasks in the plan body.
- Implement incrementally, keeping edits scoped to the phase.
- Validate locally with the narrowest useful checks for the phase. Leave the
complete affected lane to
ship's final candidate certification.
- Validate on staging when the project supports it and the change benefits from deployed verification. Never deploy to production unless the repo/user instructions explicitly allow it.
- Prove it works before moving on; capture the commands, URLs, logs, or manual checks as evidence (comm mode → a comment; file mode → the plan's "Log" section).
- Update the plan with the real outcome, plan changes, and remaining risks (the comm body, or the file).
$review-loop the phase result (plan + diff + evidence). Record each round as evidence (comm mode → a comment; file mode → the "Log" section).- If
$review-loop returns real issues: wait for the full batch, fix compatible
findings together, update the plan, run focused validation, and re-review.
steer checkpoint — before an irreversible or ambiguous step, and at phase boundaries, get human input on decisions you shouldn't make alone (comm mode → poll the comm via steer and pass the Project Root URL when one exists; file mode → ask the user directly) and escalate.- Mark the phase complete only after implementation, validation, plan update, and a clean
$review-loop round.
Autonomy standard
At every phase boundary, ask whether there is another useful action available without user input — strengthen validation, inspect logs/errors, test a realistic workflow, update stale plan text, close obvious quality gaps, reduce known risk, document residual risk, or prepare the next phase to start cleanly. If any exists, do it before moving on or stopping.
Repo config
This skill is repo-agnostic — run this repo's commands, not hardcoded ones. Read AGENTS.md (else CLAUDE.md) and its linked docs/TESTING.md for focused iteration checks and final candidate certification, plus the guide's PR/branch/merge and deploy/preview norms. If docs/TESTING.md is absent, infer suitable lanes from package.json / Makefile / CI and offer comment-init to scaffold the config.
Composes
worklog — to open the Plan comm when one isn't supplied.steer — for human checkpoints and escalations. Polling is the canonical check; push wake may resume the session only when the caller armed it through comment-identity or a daemon-backed workflow.$review-loop — the review-loop gate at every phase boundary.- Optionally
ship — when a phase ends in a deliverable PR that should reach merge-ready.
Read a composed skill's full SKILL.md before relying on it — naming it here doesn't auto-load its contract.
Stop conditions
Stop and ask the human only when:
- Something fully unexpected drastically changes the feasibility, direction, cost, or risk of the plan — proceeding would amount to choosing a new plan.
- You've exhausted the autonomous work and need a user action, secret, permission, product decision, or explicit approval that can't be reasonably inferred.
When stopping, update the plan body first with the current state, evidence, the blocker, and the exact decision or action needed — then escalate via steer. If a Project Root exists, the pause/final handoff ends with Project Root: URL.
