memory-alignment-check

name	memory-alignment-check
description	After QA PASS, compare the Story's implementation footprint against relevant memory entries. Reports confirmed entries, contradictions, and new knowledge candidates. Never writes to memory — produces a delta report for Discovery to action.
license	MIT
compatibility	Works with any filesystem-based AI coding agent
metadata	{"author":"gaai-framework","version":"1.0","category":"cross","track":"cross-cutting","id":"SKILL-MEMORY-ALIGNMENT-CHECK-001","updated_at":"2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z","status":"stable"}
inputs	["contexts/artefacts/impl-reports/{id}.impl-report.md","contexts/artefacts/stories/{id}.story.md","contexts/memory/index.md",["selective memory entries by scope tags"]]
outputs	["contexts/artefacts/memory-deltas/{id}.memory-delta.md"]

Memory Alignment Check

Purpose / When to Activate

Activate after QA verdict is PASS — never before (avoids analysis on code that will change).

This skill checks that long-term memory (decisions, patterns, project context) remains accurate after a Story is delivered. It compares only the Story's implementation footprint against relevant memory entries — not the full codebase.

The codebase is the source of truth for implementation. Memory is the source of truth for decisions and patterns. This skill checks that both remain consistent after each delivery.

This skill reports. It never writes to memory.

---

Process

1. Extract Implementation Footprint

From {id}.impl-report.md:

• Files modified or created
• New modules or services introduced
• Patterns applied during implementation
• Technical decisions made during implementation
• New integrations or external dependencies introduced

2. Retrieve Relevant Memory (Selective)

Using contexts/memory/index.md:

• Identify memory entries whose tags intersect the Story's scope and touched modules
• Load only those entries — do not load all memory
• Scope: project context, patterns, decisions relevant to the implementation footprint

3. Compare Footprint Against Memory

For each relevant memory entry, assign one verdict:

• CONFIRMED — implementation is consistent with what memory states → Record entry ID, suggest last_verified_at update to today, verified_against_story to Story ID

• CONTRADICTED — implementation contradicts or obsoletes what memory states → Record exact contradiction, affected memory entry ID, severity (high / medium / low)

• UNADDRESSED — memory entry is not touched by this Story → Skip — no verdict needed

4. Identify New Knowledge Not Yet in Memory

From the implementation footprint, extract candidates not present in memory:

• New patterns introduced not in contexts/memory/patterns/
• New architectural or technical decisions not in contexts/memory/decisions/
• New constraints or conventions applied for the first time

These are ingestion candidates — flagged for Discovery to validate and ingest.

---

Outputs

Written to: contexts/artefacts/memory-deltas/{id}.memory-delta.md

---
skill: memory-alignment-check
story_id: E01S01
generated_at: YYYY-MM-DD
verdict: ALIGNED | DRIFT_DETECTED | NEW_KNOWLEDGE_FOUND | DRIFT_AND_NEW_KNOWLEDGE
---
## Confirmed Entries

- memory_id: PATTERNS-001
  status: CONFIRMED
  suggested_last_verified_at: YYYY-MM-DD
  suggested_verified_against_story: E01S01
  note: Implementation of X is consistent with stated convention.

## Contradicted Entries

- memory_id: DEC-{N}
  status: CONTRADICTED
  severity: high | medium | low
  description: Memory states [X]. Implementation did [Y]. These are incompatible.
  action_required: Update or invalidate memory entry.

## New Knowledge Candidates

- candidate_id: CANDIDATE-001
  category: patterns | decisions | project
  description: New retry pattern introduced in services/api/client.ts — not yet in memory.
  suggested_tags: [api, resilience, patterns]
  ingestion_priority: high | medium | low

---

Verdict Logic

Verdict	Condition
ALIGNED	No contradictions, no new knowledge candidates
DRIFT_DETECTED	One or more memory entries contradicted by the implementation
NEW_KNOWLEDGE_FOUND	New knowledge candidates identified, no contradictions
DRIFT_AND_NEW_KNOWLEDGE	Both contradictions and new knowledge candidates present

---

Quality Checks

• Only memory entries intersecting the Story scope are loaded — never full memory
• Confirmed entries include specific evidence from impl-report (not assertions)
• Contradictions describe the exact mismatch — no vague statements
• New knowledge candidates are concrete and grounded in impl-report — not speculative
• No memory is written — this skill produces a report only

---

Non-Goals

This skill must NOT:

• Write or update any memory file
• Trigger memory-ingest directly (only Discovery may do so)
• Scan the full codebase
• Analyse code outside the Story's implementation footprint
• Make product or architectural decisions
• Block or modify the QA verdict