Jeden Skill in Manus ausführen
mit einem Klick

Jeden Skill in Manus mit einem Klick ausführen

explore

Sterne78

Forks5

Aktualisiert10. Juni 2026 um 13:58

DEFAULT for multi-file codebase exploration ("how does X work / where is Y", tracing an unfamiliar subsystem, log analysis). Delegate the read-only sweep instead of self-grepping — protects your context. Never delegate design/synthesis. Self-check ONLY the most imporant load-bearing files/lines; delegate breadth you wouldn't otherwise open.

Installation

Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.

In Manus ausführen

Quelle

DawidWraga

DawidWraga/davstack

GitHub-Repository öffnen Creator-Repositorys ansehen

Download

In Manus ausführen

Verwandte BerufeSOC

Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation

SoftwareentwicklerInformatik- und Mathematikberufe·SOC 15-1252

SKILL.md

readonly

name	explore
description	DEFAULT for multi-file codebase exploration ("how does X work / where is Y", tracing an unfamiliar subsystem, log analysis). Delegate the read-only sweep instead of self-grepping — protects your context. Never delegate design/synthesis. Self-check ONLY the most imporant load-bearing files/lines; delegate breadth you wouldn't otherwise open.

Scope tightly, then run (backgrounded — the harness notifies you):

explore submit --file ~/.davstack/specs/<slug>.md

When the current conversation already contains the real context, prefer compact mode over writing a spec:

explore submit --compact-mode "audit supervisor handoffs"

Keep the inline compact prompt to roughly 5-10 words. Do not paste details, requirements, quotes, or file lists into it; the compact spec-writer reads the current transcript/history and distills that context for the executor. Trust the subagent handoff unless the task is genuinely too ambiguous from conversation history.

For a single scoped fact, skip the spec file — inline it (no boilerplate):

explore submit '<goal>Exact signature + return type of resolve_query_adapter</goal> <scope>backend/src/query/adapter.py only</scope>'

Many --file run in parallel from one command. Read the result → <path> file for the answer.

Begin every --file spec with a markdown # 3-5 word title line — a short overview of the task. The TUI agent viewer renders this as the job label; without it the viewer falls back to the first 5 words of the spec, which is rarely meaningful. (Inline single-fact submits can skip the heading.)

The spec is just goal / context (the one gotcha) / scope tags. Do NOT add an output section — the structured path:line deliverable is automatic.

# Trace report-section autosave path
<goal>How does report-section autosave reach the backend?</goal>
<context>TipTap editor; suspect a debounce plus a websocket path.</context>
<scope>react/src/feat/report/** and any agent ws handler it hits.</scope>

Verify (non-negotiable). Quoted path:line facts are reliable; the synthesis is a hypothesis you re-derive yourself. Tell the user what you delegated and that you verified.

Mehr aus diesem Repository

gleiches Repository

fix-at-commits

DawidWraga/davstack

Strip the stray leading `@` from unpushed commit messages (a PowerShell here-string glitch that buries the real subject under a bare `@` line). Use when commits show up as `@ <subject>` in git log or the first line looks blank/invisible.

2026-06-1678

fast-edit

DawidWraga/davstack

Large, mechanical, low-complexity edits you can convey in a SHORT intent+constraints spec that the executor will then fully apply on its own — simple refactors, rote multi-file changes, repeated patterns. Worth delegating even if you've already read the files. Do it yourself if 1-2 line edit, or conveying it correctly would need exhaustive line-by-line detail right. Never use critical, complex edits that require careful judgement.

2026-06-0878

diagnose

DawidWraga/davstack

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Frame → reproduce the USER's failure → hypothesis tree → pre-registered experiment → instrument (delegated) → interpret with a confound gate → root cause → fix-as-hypothesis. Backed by a local Sentry log-ingest sink + `diag` query CLI and a Vitest daemon for fast unit/storybook reruns. Use when the user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

2026-06-0178

logs-server

DawidWraga/davstack

Query a local Sentry-shaped log sink (per-session SQLite under `.davstack/logs/<name>.db`) for cross-service timelines, error windows, or `trace_id` / `run_id` slices. Use when the user references a failed request, agent run, or test invocation and you need the actual log timeline rather than guessing. Also use when planting hypothesis-driven probes during a `diagnose` loop. Skip for tail-following live stdout (use the dev server directly) or for prod logs (this is local-only).

2026-06-0178

vitest-server

DawidWraga/davstack

Rerun a vitest test or storybook story file against a warm long-lived daemon — story/unit reruns drop from ~50s cold to ~3-15s warm. Use when the user asks to run / rerun a specific `.test.ts` / `.stories.tsx` file, or you've just edited code and want a fast pass/fail cycle. Skip for cold one-off CI checks (`vitest run` is fine) or when configuring vitest itself (daemon caches go stale).

2026-05-2978

name	explore
description	DEFAULT for multi-file codebase exploration ("how does X work / where is Y", tracing an unfamiliar subsystem, log analysis). Delegate the read-only sweep instead of self-grepping — protects your context. Never delegate design/synthesis. Self-check ONLY the most imporant load-bearing files/lines; delegate breadth you wouldn't otherwise open.

Scope tightly, then run (backgrounded — the harness notifies you):

explore submit --file ~/.davstack/specs/<slug>.md

When the current conversation already contains the real context, prefer compact mode over writing a spec:

explore submit --compact-mode "audit supervisor handoffs"

For a single scoped fact, skip the spec file — inline it (no boilerplate):

explore submit '<goal>Exact signature + return type of resolve_query_adapter</goal> <scope>backend/src/query/adapter.py only</scope>'

Many --file run in parallel from one command. Read the result → <path> file for the answer.

The spec is just goal / context (the one gotcha) / scope tags. Do NOT add an output section — the structured path:line deliverable is automatic.

# Trace report-section autosave path
<goal>How does report-section autosave reach the backend?</goal>
<context>TipTap editor; suspect a debounce plus a websocket path.</context>
<scope>react/src/feat/report/** and any agent ws handler it hits.</scope>

Verify (non-negotiable). Quoted path:line facts are reliable; the synthesis is a hypothesis you re-derive yourself. Tell the user what you delegated and that you verified.