| name | post-review |
| description | 三方会审 — each reviewer identity is run independently by three heterogeneous models (Opus + DeepSeek + Codex) via takeover fan-out + sharp-review's merge engine. Disagreements between models surface genuine issues. |
| argument-hint | <slug> [platform] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Glob","Grep","Agent","Skill","Bash","mcp__plugin_fabric_fabric__call"] |
/post-review — 三方会审
Two reviewer identities, each independently run by 3 heterogeneous models by default (Opus + DeepSeek + Codex; --fast drops to the first 2). Reviewers are fanned out directly via the fabric MCP tool (mcp__plugin_fabric_fabric__call); their findings are merged (dedup + confidence tagging) by sharp-review's merge-findings.js engine. post-review handles identity-specific configuration and pipeline integration.
身份A 读者代理人: [Opus] [DeepSeek V4 Pro] [Codex] → takeover fan-out → merge-findings → merged findings
身份B 技术核查员: [Opus] [DeepSeek V4 Pro] [Codex] → takeover fan-out → merge-findings → merged findings
↓
Cross-identity synthesis
Three heterogeneous models independently review with the same prompt. ≥2 agree → confident. Only one flags it → needs human judgment.
参数解析
<slug> — 文章目录名，对应 ongoing/<slug>/[platform] — 可选，指定单一平台；不填则审所有已生成平台
Walk ongoing/<slug>/2-draft/ to find the latest version number (highest N). For each platform, walk back through versions to find the latest copy. Also check for images.md in the version chain.
Phase Table
| Phase | File | What Happens |
|---|
| Setup | 01-identities.md | 审稿身份 A/B prompts + finding JSON schemas + AI味 grades |
| Setup | 02-reviewers.md | Reviewer model config arrays (Opus + DeepSeek + Codex) + --fast + merge-findings.js path resolution |
| Phase 1-2 | 03-execution.md | Per-identity takeover fan-out + merge-findings collection |
| Phase 3-5 | 04-synthesis.md | 分身份合议 (P3) → 综合裁决 (P4) → 全平台总览 (P5) |
| Phase 6 | 05-images.md | MANDATORY image plan review (术语一致性, 残留引用, 封面标题匹配, 比例) |
| Phase 7 | 06-persist.md | Write fixed articles + corrected images.md + review-verdict.md to v<N+1>/ |
Phase 6 is not optional — every review round (including single-platform re-reviews) must审 images.md against the latest drafts. If no images.md exists yet, note that in the verdict; otherwise the verdict MUST contain an ## Image plan review section. A title/motivation change in the drafts almost always staleizes the cover hook — Phase 6 is what catches it.
How to Execute
Run phases in order. At the start of each phase, Read the corresponding sub-file and follow its instructions. This SKILL.md is just the map.
Phase 1-2 run per platform. Phase 3-4 synthesize per-platform (per-identity 合议 → cross-identity verdict). Phase 5 runs once for the all-platform overview.
Hard Rules
- Twitter/X skips identity B — no code to verify, text-only platform.
- Default is 3 reviewers per identity (Opus + DeepSeek + Codex).
--fast drops to the first 2 (Opus + DeepSeek) to save a Codex call.
- Failed reviewer →
⚠️ 未响应, don't block the other identity.
- Verdict persists: every round writes
review-verdict.md to v<N+1>/. Check it to determine review status across sessions.
- Image plan review is mandatory (Phase 6): every round审
images.md; review-verdict.md must include an ## Image plan review section (or note "no images.md yet"). Cover-hook stale after a title/motivation change is the most common miss — always re-check covers against the latest title.
❌ → manual rewrite needed, then re-review; ⚠️ → fix then re-check; ✅ → ready for publish.
Invocation
Called from post-new/09-review.md after version diff chain is collected. Also callable standalone via /post-review <slug> [platform].
