| name | obsidian-literature-workflow |
| description | Obsidian 文献工作流:从导入到笔记到综述的完整流程 |
| version | 0.5.0 |
Obsidian Literature Workflow
Handle the literature sub-workflow inside the filesystem-first Obsidian project knowledge base.
Role in the workflow
This is a supporting skill under obsidian-project-memory.
Use it when the user says things like:
- “My papers are in Obsidian”
- “Read papers from Zotero and create notes in the vault”
- “Review the notes under
Papers/”
- “Generate literature knowledge notes from this project vault”
- “Connect paper notes to project knowledge”
- “Show me the literature structure as a map/graph”
- “Check whether all papers already have detailed notes”
Assumptions
- The project is already bound through
.claude/project-memory/registry.yaml, or can be imported with obsidian-project-bootstrap
- Durable paper notes live under
Papers/ inside Research/{project-slug}/
- Obsidian note writing is done through the filesystem; no Obsidian MCP is required
- Zotero may still be used as the source of metadata/full text; use
$zotero-obsidian-bridge when the source corpus is in Zotero
Default workflow
- Read bound project memory and locate the vault root.
- If the source papers are in Zotero, explicitly use
$zotero-obsidian-bridge to pull them into canonical Papers/*.md notes.
- Scan
Papers/ and adjacent synthesis notes using filesystem tools.
- Normalize note metadata and structure using
$obsidian-markdown.
- Prefer the standardized review schema:
Claim
Method
Evidence
Limitation
Direct relevance to repo
Relation to other papers
- Query narrowly first:
- read the relevant paper notes,
- then the linked
Knowledge/ notes,
- and only then open
Writing/ if the user asked for a review or comparison deliverable.
- Prefer updating existing paper notes and literature synthesis notes over creating sibling notes.
- Default literature synthesis should land in
Knowledge/, not Experiments/ or Results/:
- update
Knowledge/Literature-Overview.md
- update
Knowledge/Method-Families.md
- update
Knowledge/Research-Gaps.md
when the synthesis is stable enough to deserve canonical notes.
- If the source is a named collection and the user cares about completeness, maintain a collection inventory note with explicit coverage mapping.
- Refresh
Maps/literature.canvas after major paper-note changes or batch note creation.
- Prefer argument-map structure over dense all-to-all links.
- Prefer semantic filtering and edge thinning.
- Create
Maps/literature-main.canvas only when a lightweight presentation graph is needed.
- Update the daily note and project memory with what changed.
Default outputs
Papers/ remains first-class: one durable paper note per paper whenever possible
Knowledge/ holds durable literature synthesis notes
Maps/literature.canvas is the default visual graph surface
- literature work should usually produce at least one of:
- new or updated paper notes,
- new or updated knowledge notes,
- literature-canvas refresh,
- optional writing synthesis when requested
Default stance
Do not assume by default:
Concepts/
Datasets/
.base views
The literature workflow may create Maps/literature.canvas by default. Other artifacts still require explicit justification.
References
Load only what is needed:
references/PAPER-NOTE-SCHEMA.md - detailed paper-note frontmatter and sections
references/CANVAS-WORKFLOW.md - how and when to refresh Maps/literature.canvas