codex-usage-tracker

name	codex-usage-tracker
description	Use when the user asks about Codex token usage, model/reasoning efficiency, usage dashboards, CSV exports, or per-session/per-turn Codex usage stats from local logs.

Codex Usage Tracker

Unofficial project: Codex Usage Tracker is independent and is not made by, affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or supported by OpenAI. OpenAI and Codex are trademarks of OpenAI.

Use this plugin to inspect aggregate token usage from local Codex session logs.

Privacy Boundary

The index, dashboard payload, CSV export, and normal summaries are aggregate-only. They should never return prompts, assistant message text, tool outputs, pasted secrets, or raw transcript snippets.

The only exception is usage_call_context, which intentionally reads one selected record's source JSONL on demand. It requires CODEX_USAGE_TRACKER_ALLOW_RAW_CONTEXT=1 in the MCP server environment. Use it only when the user explicitly asks to inspect actual context, and mention that returned text is local, redacted, size-limited, and not persisted by the tracker.

Fast Paths

• For "Open dashboard" or similar dashboard-open requests, do not inspect repository files, plugin manifests, tool registries, git status, or local logs first. On macOS, first run codex-usage-tracker dashboard-service status. If it is healthy, open or report its persisted localhost URL (default http://127.0.0.1:47821) without starting another server. If it is absent or unhealthy, start the live localhost dashboard with codex-usage-tracker serve-dashboard --context-api explicit --open so Refresh, Live, load-limit, and history-scope controls can call the local API. Refresh is the default for dashboard launch commands; use --no-refresh only when the user explicitly asks for a cached snapshot. Keep a foreground server running while the user is using it. Use codex-usage-tracker open-dashboard only when the user explicitly asks for a static/offline snapshot or when the current environment cannot keep a server process running, and say that the result is static and Live requires serve-dashboard.
• For "Heaviest thread?", "Thread leaderboard", or similar thread-ranking requests, do not inspect repository files, SQLite schemas, plugin manifests, process lists, dashboard servers, or local logs manually. Use the tracker API: refresh the aggregate index, then rank threads with usage_summary(group_by="thread", limit=10, response_format="json").
• If MCP tools are unavailable for thread-ranking requests, run codex-usage-tracker refresh --json and codex-usage-tracker summary --group-by thread --limit 10 --json. The summary is already ordered by total_tokens descending.
• Answer thread-ranking requests directly from the summary rows. For the heaviest-thread question, lead with the first row's thread and total tokens; for leaderboard requests, show a compact ranked list.
• If the CLI command is missing for dashboard-open requests and you are already inside the source checkout, use PYTHONPATH=src .venv/bin/python -m codex_usage_tracker.cli serve-dashboard --context-api explicit --open. Use the source-checkout open-dashboard fallback only for static/offline snapshots or when a long-running server cannot be kept alive.
• If the CLI command is missing for thread-ranking requests and you are already inside the source checkout, use PYTHONPATH=src .venv/bin/python -m codex_usage_tracker.cli refresh --json and PYTHONPATH=src .venv/bin/python -m codex_usage_tracker.cli summary --group-by thread --limit 10 --json.
• If neither command is available, say briefly that the tracker CLI is not on PATH and ask the user to run codex-usage-tracker setup or reinstall with pipx.
• Keep dashboard-open narration minimal: one short progress note if needed, then the localhost URL, or if falling back to a static file, the file path plus a note that Live requires serve-dashboard. Do not narrate plugin discovery.

Suggested Usage Questions

When the user wants ideas, suggest concrete aggregate investigations:

• Look through my usage for token waste.
• Find calls where context got bloated.
• Show me where caching failed.
• Which threads are draining the most?
• What changed recently?
• Check whether weekly allowance behavior changed.
• Explain why the 5-hour counter looks noisy.
• Build strict-privacy allowance evidence I can share.
• Find expensive calls worth opening in the investigator.
• Check whether model or effort choice is wasting tokens.
• Test my usage-waste hypotheses and say what was true, false, or inconclusive.
• Compare repeated file rediscovery, shell churn, and large low-output calls.
• Run Compression Lab to rank overlap-adjusted context and workflow waste candidates.
• Simulate which candidate fixes would save the most future context.
• Build a strict-privacy summary I can share.

Route broad waste and context-compression questions through usage_compression_start, usage_compression_status, usage_compression_profile, usage_compression_candidates, selected usage_compression_candidate_detail, and optionally usage_compression_simulate. Use usage_investigate and usage_action_brief as compact compatibility routers when the client needs one broad entrypoint. Use usage_report_pack, usage_calls, usage_threads, usage_summary, and usage_call_detail for dashboard-shaped follow-up before considering raw context.

Remediation Recommendations

When a usage-waste investigation finds clear patterns, do not stop at "interesting." Recommend practical next actions and existing tools that could reduce future usage. Keep recommendations tied to aggregate evidence, and label speculative ideas.

• If context pressure is high, threads are long, or repeated file reads dominate, suggest Headroom if available as a follow-up tool for estimating context/headroom and deciding whether to split the thread, summarize, or start a fresh task.
• If cache ratio is low on repeated work, suggest concrete workflow fixes: keep related work in one thread, avoid unnecessary broad file reads, pin reusable project context in docs, or create a small project command/script that produces the exact aggregate needed.
• If one thread or subagent pattern dominates, suggest narrowing the task, splitting investigation from implementation, or creating a repeatable custom checklist/command so Codex does not rediscover the same facts every turn.
• If effort/model choice looks expensive, compare aggregate results by model and effort before recommending lower effort, smaller models, or explicit "use minimal reasoning unless blocked" instructions.
• If diagnostics point to missing local automation, offer to design a custom lightweight solution: a repo command, lint/test selector, dashboard report preset, support-bundle check, or Codex skill update that prevents the same waste pattern.
• Mention dashboard actions that help the user verify the fix: open Calls filtered to the expensive rows, Threads sorted by tokens, Call Investigator for a selected record, or Diagnostics Notebook for usage-drain evidence.

Phrase the final answer as "what happened, why it likely matters, what to try next, how to verify." Avoid implying an external tool is installed unless the current environment or tool registry confirms it.

Agentic Dogfood

When the maintainer asks whether MCP/skill recommendations are getting more useful, prefer the MCP polling flow when available:

1. Call usage_dogfood_start(privacy_mode="strict").
2. Poll usage_dogfood_status(job_id) until completed or failed.
3. Call usage_dogfood_result(job_id) for the compact aggregate artifact.
4. For repeated checks on unchanged data after one fresh run, call usage_dogfood_start(refresh=False, use_cache=True, privacy_mode="strict") and confirm result_cache.hit.

Use the source checkout or installed CLI only as fallback:

codex-usage-tracker dogfood-agentic --privacy-mode strict --json

Use it to check old and new hypothesis families, direct reports, suggested goals, investigation findings, and privacy checks. Treat it as compact QA evidence, not as a user-facing raw transcript export.

For experiment-style answers, use this structure:

• I'd like to be able to...
• I will accomplish it using...
• I'm missing access to...
• My hypothesis was true/false/inconclusive because...
• Next tool or fix...

Common Workflows

• Refresh the index before answering usage questions.
• Use usage_doctor when setup, plugin discovery, MCP launch, dashboard output, or pricing estimates look wrong.
• Use usage_summary for high-level totals by date, model, effort, cwd, thread, or session.
• Use usage_query for stable JSON rows filtered by date, project, model, effort, thread, pricing status, token minimums, or Codex credit minimums.
• Use usage_status for dashboard/index freshness, active/scoped/total row counts, latest refresh timestamp, and observed allowance windows.
• Use usage_allowance_status as the default Limits polling entry point. It is canonical/deduped, constant-size, reports copied clone rows excluded, and returns the next refresh or polling action.
• Use usage_allowance_series for a bounded reset-aware weekly or 5-hour timeline and usage_allowance_evidence for latest-first bounded transitions. Request local privacy mode only when physical record provenance is needed.
• Use usage_allowance_analysis for persisted change evidence; if it returns a job, poll usage_allowance_analysis_status and reload after completion.
• Use usage_dedupe_diagnostics to explain copied clone rows excluded from canonical totals while preserving aggregate/source provenance.
• Treat usage_allowance_history, usage_allowance_diagnostics, and usage_allowance_export as compatibility or explicit offline-diagnostic surfaces, not the default Limits workflow.
• Use usage_calls for the same aggregate Calls table rows as the React dashboard, including pagination, filters, derived pricing status, and credit confidence.
• Use usage_call_detail for the aggregate Call Investigator payload for one record_id. Use usage_call_context only for explicit raw-context requests.
• Use usage_threads for the same aggregate Threads table rows as the dashboard.
• Use usage_report_pack for dashboard report cards plus compact evidence rows when the user wants less cloudy "what should I inspect?" output.
• Use the Compression Lab lifecycle for broad "look through my usage for token waste" questions: start or reuse the run, poll progress, read the profile, page candidates, inspect only selected candidate details with handles, and simulate proposed interventions.
• Use usage_dashboard_recommendations when the dashboard-specific recommendation payload is more useful than the older markdown-oriented recommendation report.
• Use usage_recommendations when the user asks what to inspect next or wants ranked action items by aggregate severity.
• Use usage_summary presets today, last-7-days, by-model, by-cwd, by-thread, and expensive for common requests.
• Use usage_pricing_coverage when the user asks whether costs are fully priced or which models use estimated or missing pricing.
• Use usage_source_coverage when the user asks whether parser/source provenance coverage is healthy or whether the local index is ready for deeper investigation.
• Use session_usage for per-call and per-turn detail for one session.
• Use usage_call_context for one selected model call when the user asks to load actual logged context on demand.
• Use most_expensive_usage_calls to identify high-token calls and aggregate efficiency signals.
• Use privacy_mode="redacted" or privacy_mode="strict" for MCP tools, or the CLI global option --privacy-mode strict before a subcommand, when the user plans to share dashboards, CSV, JSON, screenshots, or support bundles.
• Use generate_usage_dashboard when the user wants a visual hoverable report, including flat calls, threaded-by-thread views, parent-thread latching for spawned subagents, auto-review attachment details, an active-only default, and explicit all-history archived-session opt-in.
• Use export_usage_csv when the user wants local spreadsheet-friendly data.
• Use update_usage_pricing_config when the user wants cost estimates based on OpenAI-published text-token pricing. This refreshes the local pricing cache and does not send local usage data anywhere. Internal Codex labels may include explicitly marked best-guess estimates when no public pricing row exists.
• Use init_usage_pricing_config only when the user wants a manual local pricing template or override file.
• Codex credit estimates are aggregate-only and use bundled or locally configured Codex rate-card values. Direct model matches are exact; aliases and inferred labels are marked estimated.
• Use init_usage_allowance_config only when the user wants a local allowance template for manually copied 5-hour or weekly remaining usage from Codex Usage or /status.
• Use allowance diagnostics for questions about limit drops, weekly allowance changes, 5-hour counter weirdness, or throttling. Prefer weekly evidence, read the nonparametric-v1 statistical evidence fields, and explain research_readiness.ready_for_public_claim separately from local evidence grades.