Menü
Brainstorm research ideas, questions, and hypotheses.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
| name | brainstorm |
| description | Brainstorm research ideas, questions, and hypotheses. |
| always | false |
When the user wants to explore research ideas, generate questions, or think through a problem.
Use paper_search to find recent trends, then generate:
For each idea, assess:
Format as a mind-map style document:
Topic: [Main Topic]
├── Subtopic A
│ ├── RQ1: [question]?
│ │ └── Hypothesis: [if X then Y]
│ └── RQ2: [question]?
├── Subtopic B
│ ├── RQ3: [question]?
│ └── Connection: [related field/method]
└── ...
brainstorm_{topic}_{date}.mdSearch HuggingFace Hub for datasets by keyword. Use when the user wants to find training data, benchmarks, or evaluation datasets for ML/NLP/CV research.
Fetch the FULL TEXT of an arXiv paper (all sections — introduction, method, results, conclusion). Use when you need to read beyond the abstract into the paper's actual content. Only works for arXiv papers. For metadata/abstract only, use paper-read. For local PDFs, use paper-read-pdf.
Two-layer memory system with grep-based recall for research sessions.
Track specific scientific claims across the literature over time — who made it, who replicated it, who challenged it, whether it still stands. Use when verifying a key assumption before building on it, or when checking whether a published result has been updated or superseded.
Scan papers for conflicting empirical claims, methodological disagreements, or opposing conclusions on the same topic. Use when writing discussion sections, evaluating conflicting results, or checking if a claim is contested before building on it.
Synthesize findings across multiple papers into a coherent narrative, structured comparison table, or temporal evolution. Use after collecting papers via survey or paper-search. Goes beyond summarizing individual papers to produce insights that only emerge when reading across the corpus as a whole.