Complete OKR & Strategy Execution system — from company vision to weekly execution. Covers goal hierarchy, OKR writing methodology, scoring rubrics, alignment cascading, KPI dashboards, review cadences, team accountability, and quarterly planning rituals. Use when setting goals, running planning cycles, tracking OKRs, building KPI dashboards, running retrospectives, or aligning team work to strategy. Trigger on: "OKR", "objectives", "key results", "goal setting", "quarterly planning", "KPIs", "strategy execution", "annual planning", "team goals", "alignment", "review cadence", "what should we focus on", "prioritize", "goal tracking", "north star metric".
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Complete OKR & Strategy Execution system — from company vision to weekly execution. Covers goal hierarchy, OKR writing methodology, scoring rubrics, alignment cascading, KPI dashboards, review cadences, team accountability, and quarterly planning rituals. Use when setting goals, running planning cycles, tracking OKRs, building KPI dashboards, running retrospectives, or aligning team work to strategy. Trigger on: "OKR", "objectives", "key results", "goal setting", "quarterly planning", "KPIs", "strategy execution", "annual planning", "team goals", "alignment", "review cadence", "what should we focus on", "prioritize", "goal tracking", "north star metric".
OKR & Strategy Execution Engine
Set bold objectives. Measure what matters. Execute with discipline. Review ruthlessly.
Quick Health Check (/8)
Before building anything, score your current goal system:
Your vision is a direction, not a destination. 1-2 sentences max.
Formula:We exist to [verb] [who] by [how], creating a world where [outcome].
Quality test:
Inspiring (makes people want to show up)
Directional (eliminates options that don't fit)
Timeless (wouldn't change if product/market shifts)
Memorable (can recite without reading)
Mission Statement
Mission = how you pursue the vision right now. Changes every 2-5 years.
Formula:We [what we do] for [who] by [unique approach], delivering [measurable impact].
North Star Metric
One metric that captures the core value you deliver. Everything else is a supporting metric.
Selection criteria:
Reflects customer value delivered (not vanity)
Leading indicator of revenue (not lagging)
Measurable weekly (not annually)
Every team can influence it (not one department)
By business type:
Business Type
North Star Metric
Why
SaaS
Weekly Active Users or NRR
Usage = value = retention
Marketplace
Transactions per week
Liquidity = value for both sides
E-commerce
Revenue per visitor
Combines traffic quality + conversion + AOV
Services
Monthly recurring revenue
Predictable value delivery
Media/Content
Engaged time per user
Attention = ad/subscription value
B2B Enterprise
Expansion revenue %
Proves ongoing value post-sale
Strategic Pillars (3-5 Max)
Pillars are the 3-5 themes that your goals cluster around. They persist for 1-3 years.
strategic_pillars:-name:"Product-Led Growth"description:"Make the product the primary acquisition and expansion engine"north_star_contribution:"Drives WAU through self-serve onboarding"-name:"Enterprise Readiness"description:"Build features and processes that enterprise buyers require"north_star_contribution:"Drives NRR through larger deal sizes"-name:"Operational Excellence"description:"Reduce cost-to-serve and increase team velocity"north_star_contribution:"Enables more output per headcount"
Rule: If a goal doesn't map to a pillar, it doesn't get resourced.
Phase 2: Annual Planning
Annual Goal Template
Set 3-5 annual goals. Each must connect to a strategic pillar.
annual_goal:id:"AG-2026-01"statement:"Reach $1M ARR through product-led acquisition"pillar:"Product-Led Growth"why_now:"Market window closing, competitors raising Series A"success_metric:"ARR ≥ $1M by Dec 31"current_baseline:"$120K ARR"milestones:q1:"$250K ARR"q2:"$450K ARR"q3:"$700K ARR"q4:"$1M ARR"dependencies:-"Hire 2 engineers by Feb"-"Launch self-serve by March"risk_factors:-"Churn > 5% monthly kills growth math"-"Engineering capacity if hiring delayed"owner:"CEO + CRO"
Annual Planning Ritual (1-2 Days)
Pre-work (1 week before):
Each leader submits: top 3 wins, top 3 misses, top 3 opportunities for next year
Finance provides: revenue forecast, budget constraints, headcount plan
Internal capability review — what are we great at? where do we suck? (30 min)
Confirm/update vision, mission, pillars (30 min)
Brainstorm annual goal candidates — aim for 10-15 (60 min)
Day 2: Prioritize & Commit
Score candidates on Impact × Feasibility matrix (45 min)
Select top 3-5 — kill the rest explicitly (30 min)
Define success metrics and quarterly milestones (60 min)
Assign owners — one person per goal (15 min)
Identify top 3 risks and mitigations (30 min)
Write up and share within 48 hours
Phase 3: OKR Writing Methodology
The OKR Formula
OBJECTIVE: [Qualitative, inspiring, time-bound statement]
KR1: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
KR2: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
KR3: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target] by [date]
Objective Quality Rules
Rule
Good
Bad
Qualitative
"Become the fastest way to onboard"
"Increase onboarding by 30%"
Inspiring
"Delight enterprise buyers"
"Complete enterprise features"
Time-bound
"This quarter" (implicit)
No deadline
Achievable-ish
70% confidence of hitting
100% or 10% confidence
Verb-forward
"Launch", "Build", "Dominate"
"Continue", "Maintain"
No metrics in objective
Described in key results
"Achieve 50% growth"
Key Result Quality Checklist
Every KR must pass ALL of these:
Measurable — a number, not a judgment ("increase NPS from 32 to 50" not "improve satisfaction")
Has a baseline — you know where you are today
Has a target — specific number, not directional ("to 50" not "higher")
Outcome-based — measures the result, not the activity ("reduce churn to 3%" not "launch retention emails")
Within your control — your team can actually influence this
Verifiable — someone else can confirm if it was hit
Not a task — tasks go in your project plan, not your OKRs
KR Scoring (0.0 — 1.0)
Score
Meaning
Signal
0.0 - 0.3
Failed to make progress
Wrong goal or wrong approach
0.4 - 0.6
Made progress but fell short
Decent goal, execution gap
0.7
Hit target (this is the goal!)
Sweet spot — ambitious but achievable
0.8 - 1.0
Exceeded target
Either amazing execution or goal was too easy
Healthy OKR program: average score across all KRs = 0.6-0.7
Average > 0.8 = goals are too safe (sandbagging)
Average < 0.4 = goals are too aggressive or execution is broken
OKR Anti-Patterns
Anti-Pattern
Example
Fix
Task masquerading as KR
"Launch new onboarding flow"
"Reduce time-to-first-value from 7 days to 2 days"
Vanity metric
"Reach 10K Twitter followers"
"Generate 50 qualified leads from social"
Binary KR
"Ship enterprise SSO"
"Enterprise accounts using SSO: 0 → 15"
Sandbagging
Target you'll hit by week 3
Stretch to what you'd hit with exceptional execution
Too many OKRs
8 objectives, 24 KRs
Max 3-5 objectives, 2-4 KRs each
No owner
"The team" owns it
One person accountable per OKR
Moving goalposts
Change target mid-quarter
Lock targets; add context in scoring
Activity KR
"Send 500 outreach emails"
"Book 30 discovery calls from outbound"
OKR YAML Template
okr:quarter:"Q1 2026"team:"Growth"parent_annual_goal:"AG-2026-01"objective:"Make self-serve onboarding so good that word-of-mouth becomes our #1 channel"key_results:-id:"KR1"metric:"Time to first value (TTFV)"baseline:"7 days"target:"< 2 days"measurement:"Median from signup to first meaningful action"owner:"Sarah"confidence:0.6# at start of quarter-id:"KR2"metric:"Self-serve conversion rate"baseline:"8%"target:"18%"measurement:"Free trial → paid within 14 days"owner:"Mike"confidence:0.5-id:"KR3"metric:"Organic referral signups"baseline:"12/month"target:"50/month"measurement:"Signups attributed to referral/word-of-mouth"owner:"Sarah"confidence:0.4initiatives:# HOW you'll hit the KRs (not OKRs themselves)-"Rebuild onboarding wizard with progressive disclosure"-"Add in-app referral program with credits"-"Weekly onboarding funnel analysis"
Phase 4: Alignment & Cascading
Cascade Architecture
COMPANY OKRs (CEO + leadership)
↓ aligns to
TEAM/DEPARTMENT OKRs (team leads)
↓ aligns to
INDIVIDUAL OKRs or COMMITMENTS (ICs)
Alignment Rules
Every team OKR must support at least one company OKR — if it doesn't, why are you doing it?
Not everything cascades down literally — team interprets company goals through their lens
Bottom-up input is mandatory — teams propose OKRs, leadership adjusts, not top-down dictation
Cross-team dependencies are explicit — if your KR depends on another team, write it down
Max 60% of capacity on OKRs — leave 40% for operational work, fires, and innovation
Alignment Map Template
alignment_map:company_objective:"Become the fastest way to onboard"team_contributions:-team:"Product"objective:"Rebuild onboarding to be self-serve"key_results: ["TTFV < 2 days", "Self-serve conversion 18%"]
-team:"Marketing"objective:"Make onboarding quality a core brand message"key_results: ["Case studies published: 5", "Onboarding-focused content: 40% of output"]
-team:"Success"objective:"Eliminate onboarding as a churn driver"key_results: ["30-day churn from onboarding issues: < 2%", "Onboarding CSAT: > 4.5"]
cross_dependencies:-from:"Marketing"to:"Product"need:"New onboarding screenshots and demo environment by week 3"-from:"Success"to:"Product"need:"In-app feedback widget for onboarding flows"
Individual Commitments (For ICs)
Not everyone needs formal OKRs. For individual contributors:
individual_commitment:name:"Alex"quarter:"Q1 2026"role:"Senior Engineer"commitments:-description:"Ship onboarding wizard v2"supports_kr:"TTFV < 2 days"milestones:-"Design complete by Jan 15"-"MVP in staging by Feb 1"-"GA with telemetry by Feb 15"-description:"Reduce p95 API latency to < 200ms"supports_kr:"Self-serve conversion 18%"milestone:"Completed by March 15"growth_goal:"Lead first architecture design review"
Phase 5: KPI Dashboard
KPI Selection Framework
KPIs are always-on metrics. OKRs are quarterly focus areas. They complement each other.
KPI categories:
Category
Purpose
Examples
Health
Is the business alive?
MRR, burn rate, runway
Growth
Are we getting bigger?
MoM growth, new customers, expansion
Efficiency
Are we getting better?
CAC, LTV/CAC, magic number
Quality
Are customers happy?
NPS, CSAT, churn rate
Velocity
Are we moving fast?
Cycle time, deployment frequency
KPI Dashboard YAML
kpi_dashboard:cadence:"weekly"health_metrics:-name:"MRR"current:"$85K"target:"$100K"trend:"up"# up/down/flatstatus:"yellow"# green/yellow/red-name:"Gross Burn"current:"$45K/mo"target:"< $50K/mo"trend:"flat"status:"green"-name:"Runway"current:"18 months"target:"> 12 months"trend:"flat"status:"green"growth_metrics:-name:"New Customers (Monthly)"current:12target:20trend:"up"status:"yellow"-name:"Net Revenue Retention"current:"108%"target:"> 110%"trend:"up"status:"yellow"quality_metrics:-name:"Monthly Churn Rate"current:"4.2%"target:"< 3%"trend:"down"# down is good for churnstatus:"red"-name:"NPS"current:42target:"> 50"trend:"up"status:"yellow"
Metric Hygiene Rules
Every metric has an owner — one person updates it weekly
Every metric has a source of truth — where does the number come from?
Every metric has thresholds — green/yellow/red defined in advance
Review weekly, act on red — yellow is a watch, red is an action item
Limit to 10-15 KPIs — more = nobody reads the dashboard
Separate leading from lagging — leading indicators predict; lagging confirms
Never game a metric — if behavior changes to hit the number without delivering value, the metric is wrong
Phase 6: Review Cadences
Weekly Check-In (30 min)
Purpose: Are we on track this week? Any blockers?
Format:
1. KPI dashboard review (5 min)
- Any metric turn red since last week?
- Action owner for each red metric
2. OKR confidence update (10 min)
- Each KR owner: confidence score (0.0-1.0) + one sentence why
- Flag anything that dropped > 0.2 since last week
3. Top 3 priorities this week (10 min)
- Each team member: what are you working on?
- Does it connect to an OKR? If not, why?
4. Blockers & asks (5 min)
- What's stuck? Who can unblock it?
Rules:
No status presentations — update a shared doc BEFORE the meeting
Meeting is for discussion, not information transfer
If everything is green and no blockers, cancel the meeting (seriously)
Monthly Review (60 min)
Purpose: Are we on track this quarter? Should we adjust?
1. KPI trend review (15 min)
- Month-over-month trends for all KPIs
- 3 metrics that improved most, 3 that degraded most
2. OKR mid-quarter assessment (20 min)
- Score each KR honestly
- Identify at-risk KRs — what's the rescue plan?
- Any KR that's clearly going to miss 0.3 → discuss kill or pivot
3. Resource check (10 min)
- Are the right people working on the right things?
- Any reallocation needed?
4. Learnings & adjustments (15 min)
- What surprised us this month?
- What would we do differently?
- Document decisions in meeting notes
Quarterly Planning & Retrospective (Half Day)
Morning: Retrospective (2 hours)
1. Score all KRs (30 min)
- Final 0.0-1.0 score for each KR
- Brief narrative: what happened and why
2. Objective-level scoring (15 min)
- Average KR scores per objective
- Did we achieve the spirit of the objective?
3. What worked? (20 min)
- Practices, decisions, approaches that drove results
- Capture for repetition
4. What didn't? (20 min)
- What failed, was abandoned, or underperformed?
- Root cause: wrong goal? wrong approach? wrong timing? under-resourced?
5. Lessons learned (15 min)
- 3 things we'll do differently next quarter
- 3 things we'll keep doing
- 1 thing we'll stop doing
Afternoon: Next Quarter Planning (2 hours)
1. Annual goal progress check (15 min)
- Are quarterly milestones on track?
- Any annual goal that needs re-scoping?
2. Context update (15 min)
- Market changes, competitive moves, customer feedback
- Any new constraints or opportunities?
3. Draft OKRs (45 min)
- Each team proposes 2-3 objectives with KRs
- Stress-test: does this connect to annual goals?
4. Alignment review (30 min)
- Map team OKRs to company OKRs
- Identify cross-team dependencies
- Resolve conflicts
5. Commit & communicate (15 min)
- Lock objectives and key results
- Set initial confidence scores
- Assign owners
- Share company-wide within 48 hours
Phase 7: Accountability & Scoring
OKR Scoring Template
okr_score:quarter:"Q1 2026"team:"Growth"objective:"Make self-serve onboarding so good that word-of-mouth becomes our #1 channel"objective_score:0.6# weighted average of KRs + qualitative judgmentkey_results:-id:"KR1"metric:"TTFV"baseline:"7 days"target:"< 2 days"actual:"3.2 days"score:0.5narrative:"Rebuilt wizard but edge cases with enterprise SSO added 2 days for 30% of users"-id:"KR2"metric:"Self-serve conversion"baseline:"8%"target:"18%"actual:"14%"score:0.6narrative:"Improved significantly but pricing page redesign delayed to Q2"-id:"KR3"metric:"Organic referral signups"baseline:"12/month"target:"50/month"actual:"38/month"score:0.7narrative:"Referral program launched week 4, ramped well. On trajectory for 50+ in Q2"lessons:-"SSO complexity was underestimated — involve security team in planning"-"Referral program should have launched week 1, not week 4"-"Pricing page has massive impact on conversion — prioritize in Q2"carry_forward:-"Enterprise SSO onboarding optimization"-"Pricing page redesign"
Grading Culture
Healthy scoring culture:
0.7 is a WIN — it means you set ambitious targets and mostly hit them
Consistent 1.0 across the board = goals are too easy, push harder
Consistent 0.3 = goals are disconnected from reality, recalibrate
Misses are learning opportunities, not punishment
Sandbagging (setting easy goals to look good) is worse than failing on ambitious ones
Red flags in scoring:
Every team scores 0.8+ every quarter → sandbagging epidemic
Scores are always exactly 0.7 → people are gaming the target
Teams argue about scoring definitions after the quarter → define measurement upfront
No one cares about the scores → OKRs aren't connected to actual work
Accountability Without Bureaucracy
For small teams (< 15 people):
Company OKRs only (no team-level)
Weekly standup covers OKR progress
Quarterly retrospective + planning = one afternoon
Individual commitments instead of individual OKRs
For medium teams (15-50 people):
Company + team OKRs
Weekly team check-ins + monthly leadership review
Quarterly planning = half day per team + half day cross-team
For larger organizations (50+ people):
Company + department + team OKRs
Dedicated OKR champion/program manager
Software tool for tracking (Lattice, Weekdone, Perdoo, etc.)
Quarterly cycle with 2-week drafting period
Phase 8: Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: First Time Setting OKRs
Start simple:
Set 2 company objectives with 3 KRs each (that's it)
Review weekly for one quarter
Score honestly at end of quarter
Add team-level OKRs in Q2 if Q1 worked
Common first-timer mistakes:
Setting 8 objectives → pick 2-3
Making KRs into task lists → focus on outcomes
Not reviewing weekly → put it on the calendar NOW
Changing goals mid-quarter → lock them, learn from the miss
Scenario 2: OKRs for a Solo Founder / Solopreneur
solo_okr:quarter:"Q1 2026"objective_1:"Build a revenue engine that doesn't depend on my time"key_results:-"Monthly recurring revenue from $2K to $8K"-"Percentage of revenue from productized offers: 0% to 60%"-"Hours worked per $1K revenue: 40 to 15"objective_2:"Establish market authority in [niche]"key_results:-"Email list from 200 to 1,000 subscribers"-"Inbound leads per month from 3 to 15"-"Published content pieces: 0 to 12"weekly_ritual:"Friday 30 min — update KR numbers, plan next week's top 3"monthly_ritual:"Last Friday — full review, adjust tactics (not goals)"
Scenario 3: Pivoting Mid-Quarter
Sometimes the world changes and your OKRs become irrelevant.
Decision framework:
Is this a temporary disruption or a fundamental shift? → Temporary = stay the course
Would continuing the OKR waste more than 20% of remaining quarter capacity? → Yes = pivot
Can you modify KRs without changing the objective? → Try this first
If you pivot:
Score original OKRs as-is with narrative explaining the pivot
Set new OKRs for remaining time with appropriately scaled targets
Don't pretend the pivot didn't happen — document the learning
Scenario 4: OKRs Across Remote/Async Teams
Written over verbal — all OKR updates in shared doc, not meetings
Async weekly updates — each person posts by Friday EOD
Sync monthly — video call for the monthly review only
Time zone equity — rotate meeting times if team spans > 6 hours
Overcommunicate confidence — in person you can read body language; async you can't
Scenario 5: Connecting OKRs to Performance Reviews
Caution: Tying OKR scores directly to compensation creates sandbagging.
Better approach:
Evaluate EFFORT and LEARNING, not just score
Someone who scores 0.5 on an ambitious OKR and learns from it > someone who scores 1.0 on a safe one
Use OKRs as INPUT to performance conversations, not the grade itself
Assess: Did they set good goals? Did they execute with discipline? Did they learn from misses?
Phase 9: Goal Quality Scoring Rubric (0-100)
Dimension
Weight
0-25 (Poor)
50 (Okay)
75-100 (Excellent)
Ambition
15%
Obviously achievable
Moderate stretch
60-70% confidence, would be proud to hit
Measurability
20%
Vague, subjective
Has a metric but fuzzy measurement
Specific number, clear source, baseline documented
Alignment
15%
Doesn't connect to strategy
Loosely related
Directly supports a pillar + annual goal
Outcome Focus
20%
List of tasks/activities
Mix of outputs and outcomes
Pure outcome — measures the result, not the work
Ownership
10%
"The team" or unassigned
Team-level but no individual
One person accountable, they wrote the OKR
Time-Bound
10%
No deadline
"This quarter"
Specific milestones within the quarter
Independence
10%
Entirely dependent on other teams
Some dependency, documented
Primarily within your control
Scoring guide:
80-100: Ship it — this is a well-crafted OKR
60-79: Good foundation, tighten weak dimensions
40-59: Needs significant rework before committing
Below 40: Start over — this isn't an OKR yet
Phase 10: Tools & Templates
Quarterly OKR One-Pager
# Q[X] 20XX OKRs — [Team Name]## Context- Annual goal this supports: [reference]
- Key assumption: [what must be true for these to matter]
- Biggest risk: [what could derail us]
## Objective 1: [Inspiring statement]
| KR | Baseline | Target | Owner | Confidence |
|----|----------|--------|-------|------------|
| [metric] | [current] | [target] | [name] | [0.0-1.0] |
| [metric] | [current] | [target] | [name] | [0.0-1.0] |
| [metric] | [current] | [target] | [name] | [0.0-1.0] |
**Key initiatives:** [2-3 bullet points of HOW]
## Objective 2: [Inspiring statement]
[same format]
## Dependencies- Need from [team]: [what] by [when]
## What we're NOT doing this quarter- [Explicit list of things we're deprioritizing]
Weekly Update Template
# Weekly OKR Update — [Date]## KPI Status
| Metric | Last Week | This Week | Status |
|--------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| [metric] | [value] | [value] | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
## OKR Confidence
| KR | Last | Now | Δ | Note |
|----|------|-----|---|------|
| [KR1] | 0.6 | 0.5 | ↓ | [why it dropped] |
## Top 3 This Week1. [priority] → supports [KR]
2. [priority] → supports [KR]
3. [priority] → operational
## Blockers- [blocker] → need [action] from [person]
Retrospective Template
retrospective:quarter:"Q1 2026"date:"2026-04-01"scores:-objective:"[text]"score:0.65key_results:-kr:"[text]"score:0.7-kr:"[text]"score:0.5-kr:"[text]"score:0.75overall_average:0.65wins:-"[what worked and why]"-"[what worked and why]"misses:-"[what failed and root cause]"-"[what failed and root cause]"keep_doing:-"[practice to continue]"start_doing:-"[new practice]"stop_doing:-"[practice to eliminate]"carry_forward_to_next_quarter:-"[unfinished work worth continuing]"
Phase 11: Advanced Patterns
OKRs + Agile Integration
Sprint planning connection:
Each sprint should advance at least one KR
Sprint goals reference which KR they support
Sprint retro includes: "did this sprint move our OKRs?"
If 3+ sprints pass without OKR progress, something is misaligned
Stretch Goals vs Committed Goals
Google-style two-tier approach:
Committed OKRs (expect 1.0): must-hit goals with consequences for missing
Aspirational OKRs (expect 0.7): ambitious stretch goals where 0.7 is success
When to use which:
Revenue targets customers depend on → Committed
Innovation or market expansion → Aspirational
Operational SLAs → Committed
Culture/employer brand → Aspirational
Leading vs Lagging Indicator Design
Every KR should ideally have a leading indicator you track weekly:
Lagging KR (quarterly)
Leading Indicator (weekly)
Revenue from $X to $Y
Pipeline generated this week
Churn from 5% to 3%
Health score distribution changes
NPS from 32 to 50
Support ticket resolution time
Conversion from 8% to 18%
Onboarding completion rate
New hires: 5
Candidates in pipeline by stage
Multi-Team OKR Dependencies
dependency_contract:provider_team:"Platform"consumer_team:"Growth"deliverable:"Self-serve SSO integration"needed_by:"2026-02-15"provider_kr:"Ship 3 enterprise features"consumer_kr:"Enterprise onboarding TTFV < 3 days"escalation_date:"2026-02-01"# if not on track by this date, escalatestatus:"on_track"
OKRs for Non-Typical Roles
Support/Ops teams:
Objective: "Deliver world-class support that turns users into advocates"
KRs: First response time, CSAT, escalation rate, knowledge base deflection %
HR/People teams:
Objective: "Build a hiring engine that attracts top talent faster"
