| name | pr-review-assist |
| description | Prepare structured PR reviews using a three-phase framework (Context, Analysis, Validation). Use when reviewing pull requests, when user shares a PR URL, or mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR". |
PR Review Assist
Great code review isn't about catching bugs—it's about building confidence in what ships. Treat every PR as the beginning of a conversation.
Prerequisites
gh CLI authenticated- PR URL or repo/number (e.g.,
owner/repo#123)
For PR Authors
Before requesting review: self-review first, leave explanatory comments on non-obvious changes, split large PRs. Move to draft when addressing feedback.
Phase 1: Context Before Code
Establish strategic foundation before looking at diffs.
gh pr view <number> --json title,body,author,files,additions,deletions,baseRefName,headRefName,labels
Business Context
- Who initiated this and why now?
- Which users/systems does this impact?
- What problem does this solve?
- How does this align with priorities?
Technical Context
- What's the blast radius if this fails?
- Are there dependencies or sequencing needs?
- Does this require cross-team coordination?
- What validation environments exist?
Phase 2: Systematic Analysis
Scope & Structure
- Is the PR appropriately sized?
- Are changes cohesive or should this be split?
- Do file changes align with stated intent?
Quality Analysis
| Aspect | Key Questions |
|---|
| Intent | Does code match PR description? |
| Correctness | Edge cases, null handling, logic errors? |
| Security | Input validation, auth, data exposure? |
| Performance | N+1 queries, loops, memory? |
| Accessibility | Keyboard, alt text, ARIA? |
| Testing | Coverage gaps? |
| Patterns | Follows repo conventions? |
Related Context
Optionally search your local notes or documentation for related context:
grep -r "<keywords>" "<your-notes-directory>/"
Phase 3: Validation
See review-checklist.md for detailed verification steps.
Mindset: Trust your team. Preferences (💅) don't block; only true blockers (🟡) that would break prod or harm users.
Actions:
- Approve: Ships safely
- Request Changes (🟡): Blockers only
- Comment (🙋): Need answers first
After: Respond to replies, react with emoji, link back in follow-ups.
Output
## PR Review: <title>
**PR**: <url> | **Author**: @<author> | **Files**: <count>
### Context
[Why now, impact, blast radius]
### Analysis
[Approach assessment, observations with file: line refs]
### Recommendation
[Approve/Request Changes/Comment] — [rationale]
Example Usage
"Review this PR: https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123"
"Help me review #1642"
Inspiration
